Define your Universe
Select your Filters
Sort your
Results
Demo
Country
Europe
North America
Africa
Asia
Oceania
Middle East
South America
Central America
Market Cap (USD)
Investor
Revenue growth
Change as of January 1 (Relative)
P/E (N+1)
Add filter
Medium-term trend
The Medium-Term Trend indicates the direction of a stock over a 126-day period. It is based on the trend drawn between the highest and lowest points of this period. The rating assesses whether the stock is in a bearish, neutral, or bullish trend.
Long-term trend
The Long-Term Trend indicates the direction of a stock over a 50-week period. It is based on the trend drawn between the highest and lowest points of this period. The rating assesses whether the stock is in a bearish, neutral, or bullish trend.
Gap Short-term support
The Short-Term Support Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its short-term technical support level.
Gap Medium-term support
The Medium-Term Support Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its medium-term technical support level.
Gap Long-term support
The Long-Term Support Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its long-term technical support level.
Gap Short-term resistance
The Short-Term Resistance Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its short-term technical resistance level.
Gap Resistance Medium-term
The Medium-Term Resistance Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its medium-term technical resistance level.
Gap Resistance Long-term
The Long-Term Resistance Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its long-term technical resistance level.
High
The "high" refers to the maximum price reached by an asset during the day. It is used to identify resistance levels or track a stock's performance. If the market is closed, it corresponds to the highest price from the last trading session.
Low
The "low" corresponds to the lowest price recorded by an asset during the day. It may represent a support level or reflect a moment of market weakness. If the market is closed, it refers to the lowest price from the last trading session.
Open
The opening price is the unique price determined after the pre-opening phase that allows the maximum number of pending orders to be executed. It results from a matching algorithm designed to optimize trade volume. This price marks the start of continuous trading.
Today's Volume
Today's volume is the total number of shares traded for a security during the trading session. It reflects the intensity of market activity and may signal investor interest or nervousness. High volume often accompanies significant price movements.
5-day moving average
The 5-day moving average is a trend-following technical indicator that calculates the average of the last five closing prices. It smooths out daily fluctuations and highlights short-term price direction. It reacts quickly to price changes but can produce more false signals than longer-term averages.
20-day moving average
The 20-day moving average is a short-to-medium-term trend indicator based on the average of the last twenty closing prices. It is less reactive to daily price swings than the 5-day average, helping to reduce market noise. It is often used to detect trend reversals or confirm ongoing price movements.
50-day moving average
The 50-day moving average is a medium-term trend indicator based on the last fifty closing prices. It is widely used to analyze momentum, identify consolidation phases, or confirm established trends. It reacts slowly but tends to provide more reliable signals than shorter averages.
100-day moving average
The 100-day moving average is a medium- to long-term trend indicator based on the last one hundred closing prices. It helps highlight structural price movements and filters out short-term fluctuations.
Average volume
The 20-day average volume reflects the average daily trading volume over the past 20 trading days. It helps assess a stock’s liquidity and identify unusual activity. It's a useful reference for confirming or invalidating price movements.
RSI 9
The RSI 9 (Relative Strength Index over 9 periods) is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and strength of recent price movements over 9 trading days. It ranges from 0 to 100, with overbought levels above 70 and oversold levels below 30. Its short setting makes it more responsive but also more prone to false signals.
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator “STIM”, created by Franck Morel
RSI 14
The RSI 14 is the standard version of the Relative Strength Index, calculated over 14 periods. Less reactive than the RSI 9, it provides a more stable and filtered view of an asset’s momentum. It remains one of the most widely used indicators for identifying overbought or oversold conditions.
EPS revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months.
Surprise rates
This rating is based on surprise rates from the last four completed fiscal periods. A surprise rate measures the difference between the consensus (average estimated value by the analysts covering the company) of an accounting item the day before publication and the actual value reported by the company on the publication day. A company that reports results above consensus receives a higher rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBIT, Net Income, and Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Nbr of analysts
The number of analysts covering the company indicates how many professionals regularly publish recommendations and forecasts about it.
Difference between Target price and stock price
The difference between the target price and the current stock price indicates the theoretical upside or downside based on the average analyst forecast. Expressed as a percentage, it serves as a synthetic indicator of market consensus. A large gap may reflect strong optimism—or a lagging stock.
Price target Average
The average price target is the mean of all analysts’ forecasts for a stock's future price. It reflects the market’s consensus view on upside or downside potential. While useful as a benchmark, it’s a dynamic estimate subject to frequent revisions.
Price to Free Cash Flow
This ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its free cash flow. It shows how much investors are paying for each unit of cash the business actually generates after essential capital expenditures. A low ratio can point to undervaluation, especially when FCF is steady or rising.
SMA5
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 5-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 5-days SMA.
SMA20
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 20-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 20-days SMA.
SMA50
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 50-day simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 50-day SMA.
SMA100
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 100-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 100-days SMA.
Revenue revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Financial estimates divergence
This rating is based on the estimates made by analysts responsible for producing the company's financial forecasts at leading global financial institutions. The lower the dispersion in estimates for the accounting items to be published over the next three years, the higher the rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBITDA, EBIT, Pre-tax Income, Net Income, Earnings Per Share (EPS), and Dividend Per Share.
Analysts' Target price divergence
This rating is based on the target prices set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. While the average target price is typically presented, it's important to understand that several analysts provide their individual assessments. The lower the dispersion in these target price estimates, the higher the rating.
Analysts' target price evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 4 months.
Analysts' target price evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts who monitor the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upgrades lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 12 months.
Target Price evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the stock at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on changes in target prices over the past 7 days.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 4 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 12 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in analysts' ratings over the past 7 days. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent upgrades result in a higher rating.
Payout Ratio
This rating is based on the projected average payout ratio (DPS / EPS) over the next two years. The higher this average level, the better the rating. It helps identify companies that distribute most of their profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. Conversely, it also highlights companies that retain the majority of their earnings for reinvestment.
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.
ESG: Controversy
The ESG controversy score reflects a company’s exposure to and management of incidents related to environmental, social, or governance issues. It considers the severity, recurrence, and how the company responds. A low score indicates serious or poorly handled events that may harm its reputation and overall ESG rating. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Environment
The environmental pillar of ESG assesses a company’s impact on natural resources and climate. It includes factors such as greenhouse gas emissions, water use, waste management, biodiversity, and energy transition. A high score indicates effective management of environmental risks and sustainability efforts. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Governance
The governance pillar of ESG examines how a company is directed, controlled, and held accountable. It covers board structure, shareholder rights, executive compensation, and risk oversight. Strong governance is seen as essential to long-term success and investor confidence. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Social
The social pillar of ESG evaluates how a company manages relationships with employees, customers, suppliers, and communities. It includes factors like labor conditions, diversity, human rights, safety, and local impact. Strong social performance indicates responsible stakeholder engagement. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Controversies
The ESG controversies score is calculated based on 23 ESG controversy topics. During the year, if a scandal occurs, the company involved is penalized and this affects their overall ESGC score and grading. The impact of the event may still be seen in the following year if there are new developments related to the negative event. For example, lawsuits, ongoing legislation disputes or fines. All new media materials are captured as the controversy progresses. The controversies score also addresses the market cap bias from which large cap companies suffer, as they attract more media attention than smaller cap companies.
Revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long term revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. A key characteristic for investors seeking companies with strong development potential.
EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's net earnings per share growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company can show strong EPS growth even if the EPS itself is negative. Use the Net Margin rating to filter out these cases if they are of no interest to you.
Long term EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's earnings per share (EPS) growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company may display strong EPS growth even if the actual EPS remains negative. Use the Net Margin rating as an additional filter if you wish to exclude such cases.
Balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long Term balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
FCF growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's FCF growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the cash flow growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
ROE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROE, the better the rating.
ROA
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROA over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROA, the better the rating.
ROCE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROCE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROCE, the better the rating.
EBIT Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's EBIT margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the EBIT margin, the better the rating.
Net Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's Net margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the Net margin, the better the rating.
EBITDA Margin
The EBITDA margin measures the share of revenue remaining after operating expenses, but before depreciation, provisions, interest, and taxes. It is calculated by dividing EBITDA by revenue and expressing the result as a percentage. A higher margin indicates stronger gross operating profitability, regardless of the company’s financial and tax structure.
Dividend Yield
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's dividend yield over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the dividend yield, the better the rating.
CAPEX/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average CAPEX / Revenue ratio over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The lower is the average, the better the rating.
Leverage
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / EBITDA ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
Gearing
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / Equity ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
P/E
This rating is based on the average Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of the company for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the stock price on the date of the EPS publication is used. However, the following ratios are calculated based on the last known stock price and EPS estimates. The lower the average level, the better the rating.
PBR
The PBR compares a company’s share price to its book value per share, representing shareholders' equity. It indicates how the market values a firm relative to its net assets. However, it's not a reliable metric across industries, since balance sheet structures differ widely.
EV/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Revenue (EV/Revenue) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/Revenue ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBITDA
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBITDA ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBIT
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBIT (EV/EBIT) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBIT ratio results in a better rating.
EV/FCF
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/FCF ratio results in a better rating.
Analysts' coverage
This rating is based on the number of estimates provided regarding the company's future business performance. A company followed by a larger number of analyst firms receives a higher rating. Naturally, the larger the company, the more analysts typically cover it.
Analysts' recommendations divergence
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate, hold, reduce, or sell shares). The rating reflects the level of divergence in analysts' opinions. A lower divergence of opinion results in a higher rating.
Analysts' buy/sell recommendations
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate (outperform), hold, reduce (underperform), or sell shares). The rating reflects the overall consensus among analysts and takes into account the number of recommendations received. A positive consensus expressed by a large number of analysts results in a higher rating.
Capital Intensity
The CAPEX / EBITDA ratio compares capital expenditures with operating earnings as measured by EBITDA. It indicates the company’s capital intensity: the higher the ratio, the larger the share of operating cash flow that must be reinvested to maintain or expand productive capacity. A low ratio, by contrast, suggests less dependence on heavy investments, leaving more room for debt reduction or shareholder returns.
Growth
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue growth, EPS growth and FCF growth ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Capital Efficiency
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the ROE, ROA and ROCE ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Profitability
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the EBITDA margin, EBIT margin and Net margin ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Financial Health
This composite rating is the result of an average of the Leverage and Gearing ratings. The company must be covered by both ratings for the calculation to be made.
Visibility
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Surprise rates, Analysts' Coverage, Financial Estimates Divergence, Analysts' Recommendations Divergence, and Analysts' Target Price Divergence. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Consensus
This intermediate composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the following ratings: Target Price Evolution (1 year), Target Price Evolution (4 months), Analysts' Target Price, Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (1 year), Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (4 months), and Analysts' buy/sell recommendations. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 6 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Financial revisions
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue revisions (1 year), Revenue revisions (4 months), EPS revisions (1 year), EPS revisions (4 months) ratings. The company must be covered by the four ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Equity Valuation
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the P/E, PBR and dividend yield ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Enterprise Value
Enterprise Value reflects the total value of a company from the perspective of a buyer. It equals market capitalization plus net debt (financial debt minus cash). Unlike market cap alone, it accounts for all capital providers — both shareholders and lenders.
Fundamentals
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Growth (Composite), Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite), Financial Health (Composite) and CAPEX/EBITDA ratings. The company must be covered by at least four of these five ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Global Valuation
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Equity Value (Composite) and Enterprise Value (Composite) ratings. The company must be covered by these two ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
Revenue revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
EPS revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Trader
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Analysts' target price
This rating is based on the distance (expressed as a percentage) between the company's latest known share price and the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. Naturally, a higher average target price relative to the current share price results in a better rating.
Target Price evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past month.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past month. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Very recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Bollinger Spread
This rating is based on the width, at the current moment, between the lower and upper Bollinger Bands. Narrower bands compared to the norm result in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks whose price is currently trading in a low-volatility congestion zone without a clear direction. Conversely, a low rating indicates a recent widening of the bands and a price acceleration characterized by high volatility.
RSI
This rating is based on the value of the 14-day RSI technical indicator. A low RSI value results in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks that are "oversold" according to the indicator. Conversely, a low rating indicates a high RSI value and an "overbought" price. It should be noted that RSI signals are more reliable in a sideways market (range-bound phase) without extreme fluctuations.
ESG: Sharia compliant
MSCI’s Sharia Compliance data feed / Islamic Index methodology screens companies according to Sharia (Islamic law) principles. That includes two types of screens: business activity screening (excluding companies whose operations derive above certain thresholds of revenue from prohibited activities — e.g. alcohol, gambling, pork products, conventional financial services, weapons, etc.) and financial ratio screening (limits on debt, cash & interest?bearing securities, etc.). MSCI offers variations (e.g. using total assets, or average market cap) to accommodate different client preferences.
ESG: Data confidentiality
“Data confidentiality” (often part of “Privacy & Data Security” in MSCI’s model) refers to how a company handles and protects data (especially personal or non-public) from misuse, data breaches, leaks; how it complies with evolving regulations (e.g. GDPR etc.), what practices / systems are in place (e.g. information security certifications, internal controls, employee training) to ensure confidentiality. The exposure to risk (level of data collected, geographic regulatory burden, etc.) and management of that risk are scored.
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator “STIM”, created by Franck Morel
ESG: Corporate Behavior
“Corporate Behavior” is a MSCI Theme (or a combination of Key Issues) under the Governance pillar. It includes oversight of business conduct, ethics, anti-corruption/fraud, executive misconduct, antitrust behavior, how a company behaves in its governance practices beyond formal structure. Related to how a company acts in its day-to-day operations and compliance and its exposure to reputational, legal, governance risk from misbehavior.
ESG: Implied Temperature Rise (ITR)
Implied Temperature Rise is a forward-looking metric from MSCI that estimates the degree (in °C) by which a company or portfolio is aligned (or misaligned) with global warming targets (notably the Paris Agreement goals, e.g. stay well below 2°C, aiming at 1.5°C). It does so by comparing projected GHG emissions (Scopes 1,2,3) and emission reduction targets of companies, against an allocated carbon budget (“fair share”) and then converting over/undershoot of that budget into an implied temperature increase. The output is used to assess climate alignment, set decarbonization targets, etc.
ESG: Ethical controversies
Part of MSCI’s ESG Controversies / Global Norms methodology. An ethical controversy would be an alleged misconduct by a company in ethics-related issues: e.g. fraud, corruption, bribery, executive misconduct, antitrust violations, money laundering. When such allegations are publicly reported, MSCI assesses their severity (Very Severe, Severe, Moderate, Minor), the company’s direct or indirect involvement, whether ongoing vs resolved, etc. These controversies affect the company’s ESG score/ratings under relevant Key Issues (e.g. Business Ethics) and contribute to reputational / governance risk.
ESG: Human rights controversies
A subset of MSCI’s ESG Controversies under the Social pillar (often under “Human Rights & Community” and/or “Labour Rights & Supply Chain”). These are public allegations (or proven cases) of adverse impacts related to human rights by company operations or value chain: e.g. forced labor, child labor, discrimination, abuses in communities, etc. MSCI tracks, scores, and flags these controversies similarly (severity, role, status) and includes them in the company’s overall controversy flag / score.
ESG: Tax subsidies controversies
Refer to controversies around tax subsidies: e.g. companies benefiting from subsidies in ways that may be controversial, or engaging in tax avoidance / favorable tax treatment that may draw public scrutiny. In MSCI’s framework, tax issues are covered under the Tax Transparency Key Issue under Governance. Companies are evaluated on their estimated “tax gap,” revenue-reporting transparency, involvement in tax-related controversies. “Tax subsidies controversies” likely fall under ongoing tax-related controversies, which degrade the Tax Transparency score.
Unusual Volumes
This rating is based on the stock's daily volumes. The volume of the most recent trading session is compared to a simple moving average of volumes. The higher the volume relative to this average, the higher the rating. This allows identification of stocks attracting renewed interest from investors and/or speculators.
ST Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the short-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
MT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the medium-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
LT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the long-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
ST_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum; particularly the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 12 months. The more the price has risen, and the more steadily this increase has occurred, the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and bearish the trend, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks that exhibit a strong and consistent near-term upward trend.
MT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 36 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent medium-term upward trend.
LT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 60 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent long-term upward trend.
Revenue revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months. In the short term, the 4-month revision rating is essential for assessing quick adjustments, which may result from quarterly announcements, strategic updates, or external shocks temporarily impacting the perception of future revenues.
Revenue revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
EPS revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
Volatility
This rating is simply based on the standard deviation of the stock's daily returns over the past 12 months. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. Lower volatility in returns results in a higher rating.
5 days variation
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance over the last 5 trading sessions. It mainly allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
Change as of January 1 (Relative)
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance since the beginning of the calendar year. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their price behavior over the current year. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
EPS revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Record volume
Record volume refers to the all-time high number of shares traded in a single session. Such spikes usually reflect heightened investor interest or nervousness, often triggered by a major announcement or event.
Week to date change
Week-to-date change tracks the performance of an asset from the start of the trading week up to the current date.
Month to date change
Month-to-date change tracks the performance of an asset from the start of the trading month up to the current date.
1-month change
Price variation over the last month (calendar). If today is July 16, this refers to the change between June 16 and today.
3-month change
Price variation over the last 3 months (calendar). If today is July 16, this refers to the change between April 16 and today.
6-month change
Price variation over the last 6 months (calendar). If today is July 16, this refers to the change between January 16 and today.
1-year price change
Price variation over the last 12 months (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2024 and today.
3-year price change
Price variation over the last 3 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2022 and today.
5-year price change
Price variation over the last 5 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2020 and today.
10-year price change
Price variation over the last 10 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2015 and today.
High 1 month
Highest price over the last calendar month. If today is July 16, this refers to the highest price recorded between June 16 and July 16.
Low 1 month
Lowest price over the last calendar month. If today is July 16, this refers to the lowest price recorded between June 16 and July 16.
High YTD
Highest price since January 1 of the current year.
Low YTD
Lowest price since January 1 of the current year.
High 1 year
Highest price over the last 12 months (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2024 and today.
Low 1 year
Lowest price over the last 12 months (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2024 and today.
High 3 years
Highest price over the last 3 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2022 and today.
Low 3 years
Lowest price over the last 3 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2022 and today.
High 5 years
Highest price over the last 5 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2020 and today.
Low 5 years
Lowest price over the last 5 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2020 and today.
High 10 years
Highest price over the last 10 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2015 and today.
Low 10 years
Lowest price over the last 10 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2015 and today.
Results to be published within 15 days
Identifies companies that will release their financial results within the next two weeks.
Will publish results within 30 days
Identifies companies that will release their financial results within the next 30 days.
Will publish results in more than 30 days
Identifies companies whose financial results are expected to be released in more than 30 days.
Earnings published less than 15 days ago
Identifies companies that have released their financial results within the past two weeks.
Earnings published less than a month ago
Identifies companies that have released their financial results within the past 30 days.
Published over a month ago
Identifies companies whose most recent financial results were released more than 30 days ago.
Earnings due in less than a week
Identifies companies that will release their financial results within the next 7 days.
Earnings due tomorrow
Identifies companies that will release their financial results tomorrow.
 | 11.12x | 10.83B | ||||
| 19.2x | 42.73B | ||||
| 21.64x | 9.91B | ||||
| 29.77x | 6.84B | ||||
| 7.66x | 27.48B | ||||
| 14.38x | 4.17B | ||||
| 13.88x | 2.65B | ||||
| 13.7x | 13.28B | ||||
| 10.04x | 14.09B | ||||
| 6.07x | 6.68B | ||||
| 12.84x | 633M | ||||
| 11.48x | 79.77B | ||||
| 6.89x | 666M | ||||
| 23.8x | 60.64B | ||||
| 25.76x | 2.45B | ||||
| 21.1x | 9.98B | ||||
| 33.28x | 43.12B | ||||
| 4.32x | 519M | ||||
| 9.09x | 64.45B | ||||
| 23.48x | 12.41B | ||||
| 31.65x | 34.88B | ||||
| - | - | 5.88B | |||
| 9.3x | 871M | ||||
| 13.15x | 11.48B | ||||
| 16.55x | 13.16B | ||||
| 25.17x | 1.46B | ||||
| - | - | 8B | |||
| 12.77x | 2.9B | ||||
| 7.08x | 672M | ||||
| 14.94x | 49.64B | ||||
| 10.66x | 56.48B | ||||
| 12.99x | 98.01B | ||||
| 13.11x | 57.78B | ||||
| 13.16x | 14.42B | ||||
| 6.83x | 590M | ||||
| 5.53x | 4.62B | ||||
| 7.13x | 12.94B | ||||
| 19.91x | 9.7B | ||||
| 22.33x | 43.07B | ||||
| 18.15x | 71.13B | ||||
Categories
Medium-term trend
The Medium-Term Trend indicates the direction of a stock over a 126-day period. It is based on the trend drawn between the highest and lowest points of this period. The rating assesses whether the stock is in a bearish, neutral, or bullish trend.
Long-term trend
The Long-Term Trend indicates the direction of a stock over a 50-week period. It is based on the trend drawn between the highest and lowest points of this period. The rating assesses whether the stock is in a bearish, neutral, or bullish trend.
Short-term support
The Short-Term Timing evaluates the position of a stock’s latest closing price relative to its support and resistance levels, as determined by automated technical analysis on daily data over 30 days. The higher the rating, the closer the price is to its support and the farther it is from its resistance, suggesting a potential short-term buying opportunity. Conversely, a low rating suggests that the price is near its resistance and farther from its support, which could indicate a potential selling opportunity.
Medium-term support
The Medium-Term Timing evaluates the position of a stock’s latest closing price relative to its support and resistance levels, as determined by automated technical analysis on daily data over 126 days. A higher rating indicates that the price is closer to its support and farther from its resistance, pointing to a potential buying opportunity. Conversely, a low rating suggests that the price is near its resistance and farther from its support, which could signal a potential selling opportunity.
Long-term support
The Long-Term Timing evaluates the position of a stock’s latest closing price relative to its support and resistance levels, as determined by automated technical analysis on weekly data over 50 weeks. A higher rating means the price is closer to its support and farther from its resistance, suggesting a potential long-term buying opportunity. Conversely, a low rating indicates that the price is near its resistance and farther from its support, potentially signaling a selling opportunity.
Gap Short-term support
The Short-Term Support Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its short-term technical support level.
Gap Medium-term support
The Medium-Term Support Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its medium-term technical support level.
Gap Long-term support
The Long-Term Support Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its long-term technical support level.
Gap Short-term resistance
The Short-Term Resistance Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its short-term technical resistance level.
Gap Resistance Medium-term
The Medium-Term Resistance Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its medium-term technical resistance level.
Gap Resistance Long-term
The Long-Term Resistance Gap measures the distance between a stock’s latest closing price and its long-term technical resistance level.
Crossing Support / Resistance
The Crossing Support/Resistance criterion is used to evaluate a stock’s position relative to its support and resistance levels. An “S” indicates a break below a support level, while an “R” indicates a breakout above a resistance level.
High
The "high" refers to the maximum price reached by an asset during the day. It is used to identify resistance levels or track a stock's performance. If the market is closed, it corresponds to the highest price from the last trading session.
Low
The "low" corresponds to the lowest price recorded by an asset during the day. It may represent a support level or reflect a moment of market weakness. If the market is closed, it refers to the lowest price from the last trading session.
Open
The opening price is the unique price determined after the pre-opening phase that allows the maximum number of pending orders to be executed. It results from a matching algorithm designed to optimize trade volume. This price marks the start of continuous trading.
Today's Volume
Today's volume is the total number of shares traded for a security during the trading session. It reflects the intensity of market activity and may signal investor interest or nervousness. High volume often accompanies significant price movements.
5-day moving average
The 5-day moving average is a trend-following technical indicator that calculates the average of the last five closing prices. It smooths out daily fluctuations and highlights short-term price direction. It reacts quickly to price changes but can produce more false signals than longer-term averages.
20-day moving average
The 20-day moving average is a short-to-medium-term trend indicator based on the average of the last twenty closing prices. It is less reactive to daily price swings than the 5-day average, helping to reduce market noise. It is often used to detect trend reversals or confirm ongoing price movements.
50-day moving average
The 50-day moving average is a medium-term trend indicator based on the last fifty closing prices. It is widely used to analyze momentum, identify consolidation phases, or confirm established trends. It reacts slowly but tends to provide more reliable signals than shorter averages.
100-day moving average
The 100-day moving average is a medium- to long-term trend indicator based on the last one hundred closing prices. It helps highlight structural price movements and filters out short-term fluctuations.
Average volume
The 20-day average volume reflects the average daily trading volume over the past 20 trading days. It helps assess a stock’s liquidity and identify unusual activity. It's a useful reference for confirming or invalidating price movements.
RSI 9
The RSI 9 (Relative Strength Index over 9 periods) is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and strength of recent price movements over 9 trading days. It ranges from 0 to 100, with overbought levels above 70 and oversold levels below 30. Its short setting makes it more responsive but also more prone to false signals.
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator “STIM”, created by Franck Morel
RSI 14
The RSI 14 is the standard version of the Relative Strength Index, calculated over 14 periods. Less reactive than the RSI 9, it provides a more stable and filtered view of an asset’s momentum. It remains one of the most widely used indicators for identifying overbought or oversold conditions.
Market Cap (USD)
Market capitalization is the valuation at a given moment of all outstanding shares of a publicly traded company. It provides an indication of the company’s size on financial markets. Companies are typically categorized as small, mid, or large caps based on this figure.
Average volume (M$)
The average volume (in USD) over 20 sessions represents the average daily monetary value of trades over the past 20 trading days. It indicates the liquidity of a stock in terms of capital exchanged. This reference point helps detect unusual activity or confirm the validity of a price movement.
Sector
The sector groups companies that operate within the same broad economic activity, such as healthcare, finance, or energy. It classifies businesses based on their primary line of work. This categorization helps in comparing companies and performing sector-based portfolio analysis.
Stock exchange
The primary stock exchange is the market where a listed company conducts most of its share trading. It is typically the reference exchange for its official price.
EPS revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months.
Surprise rates
This rating is based on surprise rates from the last four completed fiscal periods. A surprise rate measures the difference between the consensus (average estimated value by the analysts covering the company) of an accounting item the day before publication and the actual value reported by the company on the publication day. A company that reports results above consensus receives a higher rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBIT, Net Income, and Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Nbr of analysts
The number of analysts covering the company indicates how many professionals regularly publish recommendations and forecasts about it.
Difference between Target price and stock price
The difference between the target price and the current stock price indicates the theoretical upside or downside based on the average analyst forecast. Expressed as a percentage, it serves as a synthetic indicator of market consensus. A large gap may reflect strong optimism—or a lagging stock.
Price target Average
The average price target is the mean of all analysts’ forecasts for a stock's future price. It reflects the market’s consensus view on upside or downside potential. While useful as a benchmark, it’s a dynamic estimate subject to frequent revisions.
Price to Free Cash Flow
This ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to its free cash flow. It shows how much investors are paying for each unit of cash the business actually generates after essential capital expenditures. A low ratio can point to undervaluation, especially when FCF is steady or rising.
SMA5
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 5-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 5-days SMA.
SMA20
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 20-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 20-days SMA.
SMA50
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 50-day simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 50-day SMA.
SMA100
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 100-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 100-days SMA.
Revenue revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Financial estimates divergence
This rating is based on the estimates made by analysts responsible for producing the company's financial forecasts at leading global financial institutions. The lower the dispersion in estimates for the accounting items to be published over the next three years, the higher the rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBITDA, EBIT, Pre-tax Income, Net Income, Earnings Per Share (EPS), and Dividend Per Share.
Analysts' Target price divergence
This rating is based on the target prices set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. While the average target price is typically presented, it's important to understand that several analysts provide their individual assessments. The lower the dispersion in these target price estimates, the higher the rating.
Analysts' target price evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 4 months.
Analysts' target price evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts who monitor the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upgrades lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 12 months.
Target Price evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the stock at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on changes in target prices over the past 7 days.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 4 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 12 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in analysts' ratings over the past 7 days. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent upgrades result in a higher rating.
Payout Ratio
This rating is based on the projected average payout ratio (DPS / EPS) over the next two years. The higher this average level, the better the rating. It helps identify companies that distribute most of their profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. Conversely, it also highlights companies that retain the majority of their earnings for reinvestment.
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.
ESG: Controversy
The ESG controversy score reflects a company’s exposure to and management of incidents related to environmental, social, or governance issues. It considers the severity, recurrence, and how the company responds. A low score indicates serious or poorly handled events that may harm its reputation and overall ESG rating. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Environment
The environmental pillar of ESG assesses a company’s impact on natural resources and climate. It includes factors such as greenhouse gas emissions, water use, waste management, biodiversity, and energy transition. A high score indicates effective management of environmental risks and sustainability efforts. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Governance
The governance pillar of ESG examines how a company is directed, controlled, and held accountable. It covers board structure, shareholder rights, executive compensation, and risk oversight. Strong governance is seen as essential to long-term success and investor confidence. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Social
The social pillar of ESG evaluates how a company manages relationships with employees, customers, suppliers, and communities. It includes factors like labor conditions, diversity, human rights, safety, and local impact. Strong social performance indicates responsible stakeholder engagement. This assessment uses the best-in-class methodology, meaning it is conducted relative to industry peers.
ESG: Controversies
The ESG controversies score is calculated based on 23 ESG controversy topics. During the year, if a scandal occurs, the company involved is penalized and this affects their overall ESGC score and grading. The impact of the event may still be seen in the following year if there are new developments related to the negative event. For example, lawsuits, ongoing legislation disputes or fines. All new media materials are captured as the controversy progresses. The controversies score also addresses the market cap bias from which large cap companies suffer, as they attract more media attention than smaller cap companies.
Revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long term revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. A key characteristic for investors seeking companies with strong development potential.
EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's net earnings per share growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company can show strong EPS growth even if the EPS itself is negative. Use the Net Margin rating to filter out these cases if they are of no interest to you.
Long term EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's earnings per share (EPS) growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company may display strong EPS growth even if the actual EPS remains negative. Use the Net Margin rating as an additional filter if you wish to exclude such cases.
Balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long Term balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
FCF growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's FCF growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the cash flow growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
ROE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROE, the better the rating.
ROA
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROA over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROA, the better the rating.
ROCE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROCE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROCE, the better the rating.
EBIT Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's EBIT margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the EBIT margin, the better the rating.
Net Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's Net margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the Net margin, the better the rating.
EBITDA Margin
The EBITDA margin measures the share of revenue remaining after operating expenses, but before depreciation, provisions, interest, and taxes. It is calculated by dividing EBITDA by revenue and expressing the result as a percentage. A higher margin indicates stronger gross operating profitability, regardless of the company’s financial and tax structure.
Dividend Yield
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's dividend yield over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the dividend yield, the better the rating.
CAPEX/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average CAPEX / Revenue ratio over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The lower is the average, the better the rating.
Leverage
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / EBITDA ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
Gearing
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / Equity ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
P/E
This rating is based on the average Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of the company for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the stock price on the date of the EPS publication is used. However, the following ratios are calculated based on the last known stock price and EPS estimates. The lower the average level, the better the rating.
PBR
The PBR compares a company’s share price to its book value per share, representing shareholders' equity. It indicates how the market values a firm relative to its net assets. However, it's not a reliable metric across industries, since balance sheet structures differ widely.
EV/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Revenue (EV/Revenue) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/Revenue ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBITDA
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBITDA ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBIT
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBIT (EV/EBIT) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBIT ratio results in a better rating.
EV/FCF
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/FCF ratio results in a better rating.
Analysts' coverage
This rating is based on the number of estimates provided regarding the company's future business performance. A company followed by a larger number of analyst firms receives a higher rating. Naturally, the larger the company, the more analysts typically cover it.
Analysts' recommendations divergence
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate, hold, reduce, or sell shares). The rating reflects the level of divergence in analysts' opinions. A lower divergence of opinion results in a higher rating.
Analysts' buy/sell recommendations
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate (outperform), hold, reduce (underperform), or sell shares). The rating reflects the overall consensus among analysts and takes into account the number of recommendations received. A positive consensus expressed by a large number of analysts results in a higher rating.
Capital Intensity
The CAPEX / EBITDA ratio compares capital expenditures with operating earnings as measured by EBITDA. It indicates the company’s capital intensity: the higher the ratio, the larger the share of operating cash flow that must be reinvested to maintain or expand productive capacity. A low ratio, by contrast, suggests less dependence on heavy investments, leaving more room for debt reduction or shareholder returns.
Growth
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue growth, EPS growth and FCF growth ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Capital Efficiency
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the ROE, ROA and ROCE ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Profitability
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the EBITDA margin, EBIT margin and Net margin ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Financial Health
This composite rating is the result of an average of the Leverage and Gearing ratings. The company must be covered by both ratings for the calculation to be made.
Visibility
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Surprise rates, Analysts' Coverage, Financial Estimates Divergence, Analysts' Recommendations Divergence, and Analysts' Target Price Divergence. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Consensus
This intermediate composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the following ratings: Target Price Evolution (1 year), Target Price Evolution (4 months), Analysts' Target Price, Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (1 year), Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (4 months), and Analysts' buy/sell recommendations. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 6 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Financial revisions
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue revisions (1 year), Revenue revisions (4 months), EPS revisions (1 year), EPS revisions (4 months) ratings. The company must be covered by the four ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Equity Valuation
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the P/E, PBR and dividend yield ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Enterprise Value
Enterprise Value reflects the total value of a company from the perspective of a buyer. It equals market capitalization plus net debt (financial debt minus cash). Unlike market cap alone, it accounts for all capital providers — both shareholders and lenders.
Fundamentals
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Growth (Composite), Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite), Financial Health (Composite) and CAPEX/EBITDA ratings. The company must be covered by at least four of these five ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Global Valuation
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Equity Value (Composite) and Enterprise Value (Composite) ratings. The company must be covered by these two ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
Revenue revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
EPS revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Trader
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Analysts' target price
This rating is based on the distance (expressed as a percentage) between the company's latest known share price and the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. Naturally, a higher average target price relative to the current share price results in a better rating.
Target Price evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past month.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past month. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Very recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Bollinger Spread
This rating is based on the width, at the current moment, between the lower and upper Bollinger Bands. Narrower bands compared to the norm result in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks whose price is currently trading in a low-volatility congestion zone without a clear direction. Conversely, a low rating indicates a recent widening of the bands and a price acceleration characterized by high volatility.
RSI
This rating is based on the value of the 14-day RSI technical indicator. A low RSI value results in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks that are "oversold" according to the indicator. Conversely, a low rating indicates a high RSI value and an "overbought" price. It should be noted that RSI signals are more reliable in a sideways market (range-bound phase) without extreme fluctuations.
ESG: Sharia compliant
MSCI’s Sharia Compliance data feed / Islamic Index methodology screens companies according to Sharia (Islamic law) principles. That includes two types of screens: business activity screening (excluding companies whose operations derive above certain thresholds of revenue from prohibited activities — e.g. alcohol, gambling, pork products, conventional financial services, weapons, etc.) and financial ratio screening (limits on debt, cash & interest?bearing securities, etc.). MSCI offers variations (e.g. using total assets, or average market cap) to accommodate different client preferences.
ESG: Data confidentiality
“Data confidentiality” (often part of “Privacy & Data Security” in MSCI’s model) refers to how a company handles and protects data (especially personal or non-public) from misuse, data breaches, leaks; how it complies with evolving regulations (e.g. GDPR etc.), what practices / systems are in place (e.g. information security certifications, internal controls, employee training) to ensure confidentiality. The exposure to risk (level of data collected, geographic regulatory burden, etc.) and management of that risk are scored.
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator “STIM”, created by Franck Morel
ESG: Corporate Behavior
“Corporate Behavior” is a MSCI Theme (or a combination of Key Issues) under the Governance pillar. It includes oversight of business conduct, ethics, anti-corruption/fraud, executive misconduct, antitrust behavior, how a company behaves in its governance practices beyond formal structure. Related to how a company acts in its day-to-day operations and compliance and its exposure to reputational, legal, governance risk from misbehavior.
ESG: Implied Temperature Rise (ITR)
Implied Temperature Rise is a forward-looking metric from MSCI that estimates the degree (in °C) by which a company or portfolio is aligned (or misaligned) with global warming targets (notably the Paris Agreement goals, e.g. stay well below 2°C, aiming at 1.5°C). It does so by comparing projected GHG emissions (Scopes 1,2,3) and emission reduction targets of companies, against an allocated carbon budget (“fair share”) and then converting over/undershoot of that budget into an implied temperature increase. The output is used to assess climate alignment, set decarbonization targets, etc.
ESG: Risk of water stress
In MSCI’s ESG framework, “Water Stress” is a Key Issue under the Environmental pillar / Natural Capital / Water domain. It refers to the risk that a company’s operations will be adversely impacted by scarcity of water (e.g. quantity, quality, competing uses), or that the company contributes to water stress (overuse, pollution). MSCI measures exposure (geographic, industry) and management practices for mitigating water risks. (E.g. whether the company discloses water withdrawal, consumption, water risk mapping, conservation strategies.)
ESG: Ethical controversies
Part of MSCI’s ESG Controversies / Global Norms methodology. An ethical controversy would be an alleged misconduct by a company in ethics-related issues: e.g. fraud, corruption, bribery, executive misconduct, antitrust violations, money laundering. When such allegations are publicly reported, MSCI assesses their severity (Very Severe, Severe, Moderate, Minor), the company’s direct or indirect involvement, whether ongoing vs resolved, etc. These controversies affect the company’s ESG score/ratings under relevant Key Issues (e.g. Business Ethics) and contribute to reputational / governance risk.
ESG: Human rights controversies
A subset of MSCI’s ESG Controversies under the Social pillar (often under “Human Rights & Community” and/or “Labour Rights & Supply Chain”). These are public allegations (or proven cases) of adverse impacts related to human rights by company operations or value chain: e.g. forced labor, child labor, discrimination, abuses in communities, etc. MSCI tracks, scores, and flags these controversies similarly (severity, role, status) and includes them in the company’s overall controversy flag / score.
ESG: Tax subsidies controversies
Refer to controversies around tax subsidies: e.g. companies benefiting from subsidies in ways that may be controversial, or engaging in tax avoidance / favorable tax treatment that may draw public scrutiny. In MSCI’s framework, tax issues are covered under the Tax Transparency Key Issue under Governance. Companies are evaluated on their estimated “tax gap,” revenue-reporting transparency, involvement in tax-related controversies. “Tax subsidies controversies” likely fall under ongoing tax-related controversies, which degrade the Tax Transparency score.
Unusual Volumes
This rating is based on the stock's daily volumes. The volume of the most recent trading session is compared to a simple moving average of volumes. The higher the volume relative to this average, the higher the rating. This allows identification of stocks attracting renewed interest from investors and/or speculators.
ST Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the short-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
MT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the medium-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
LT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the long-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
ST_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum; particularly the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 12 months. The more the price has risen, and the more steadily this increase has occurred, the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and bearish the trend, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks that exhibit a strong and consistent near-term upward trend.
MT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 36 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent medium-term upward trend.
LT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 60 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent long-term upward trend.
Revenue revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months. In the short term, the 4-month revision rating is essential for assessing quick adjustments, which may result from quarterly announcements, strategic updates, or external shocks temporarily impacting the perception of future revenues.
Revenue revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
EPS revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
Volatility
This rating is simply based on the standard deviation of the stock's daily returns over the past 12 months. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. Lower volatility in returns results in a higher rating.
5 days variation
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance over the last 5 trading sessions. It mainly allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
Change as of January 1 (Relative)
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance since the beginning of the calendar year. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their price behavior over the current year. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
EPS revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Record volume
Record volume refers to the all-time high number of shares traded in a single session. Such spikes usually reflect heightened investor interest or nervousness, often triggered by a major announcement or event.
Reached an all-time high today
Allows identifying companies whose stock price is reaching new all-time highs.
Next earnings date
The next earnings date refers to the scheduled day when a company will release its financial results (quarterly, semi-annual, or annual). It is a key event for investors, as earnings announcements often have a strong impact on the stock price. Markets typically anticipate these releases, leading to increased volatility ahead of the date.
Week to date change
Week-to-date change tracks the performance of an asset from the start of the trading week up to the current date.
Month to date change
Month-to-date change tracks the performance of an asset from the start of the trading month up to the current date.
1-month change
Price variation over the last month (calendar). If today is July 16, this refers to the change between June 16 and today.
3-month change
Price variation over the last 3 months (calendar). If today is July 16, this refers to the change between April 16 and today.
6-month change
Price variation over the last 6 months (calendar). If today is July 16, this refers to the change between January 16 and today.
1-year price change
Price variation over the last 12 months (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2024 and today.
3-year price change
Price variation over the last 3 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2022 and today.
5-year price change
Price variation over the last 5 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2020 and today.
10-year price change
Price variation over the last 10 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the change between July 16, 2015 and today.
High 1 month
Highest price over the last calendar month. If today is July 16, this refers to the highest price recorded between June 16 and July 16.
Low 1 month
Lowest price over the last calendar month. If today is July 16, this refers to the lowest price recorded between June 16 and July 16.
High YTD
Highest price since January 1 of the current year.
Low YTD
Lowest price since January 1 of the current year.
High 1 year
Highest price over the last 12 months (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2024 and today.
Low 1 year
Lowest price over the last 12 months (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2024 and today.
High 3 years
Highest price over the last 3 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2022 and today.
Low 3 years
Lowest price over the last 3 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2022 and today.
High 5 years
Highest price over the last 5 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2020 and today.
Low 5 years
Lowest price over the last 5 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2020 and today.
High 10 years
Highest price over the last 10 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the highest price recorded between July 16, 2015 and today.
Low 10 years
Lowest price over the last 10 years (calendar). If today is July 16, 2025, this refers to the lowest price recorded between July 16, 2015 and today.
Results to be published within 15 days
Identifies companies that will release their financial results within the next two weeks.
Will publish results within 30 days
Identifies companies that will release their financial results within the next 30 days.
Will publish results in more than 30 days
Identifies companies whose financial results are expected to be released in more than 30 days.
Earnings published less than 15 days ago
Identifies companies that have released their financial results within the past two weeks.
Earnings published less than a month ago
Identifies companies that have released their financial results within the past 30 days.
Published over a month ago
Identifies companies whose most recent financial results were released more than 30 days ago.
Earnings due in less than a week
Identifies companies that will release their financial results within the next 7 days.
Earnings due tomorrow
Identifies companies that will release their financial results tomorrow.
Select your edition
All financial news and data tailored to specific country editions
