Transforming Cancer Care with Immune-modulating Therapies

April 2026

NASDAQ: BYSI Non-Confidential





Investment Highlights

>700 cancer patients treated with good tolerability; Demonstrated overall survival benefits and reduction of severe neutropenia in 2L/3L NSCLC EGFR Wide Type vs. docetaxel

Durable Anti-cancer Efficacy and Safety

First-in-class small molecule: a unique, reversible tubulin depolymerizing agent with MoA of dendritic cell maturation and prevention chemotherapy induced neutropenia

Plinabulin: Unique Immune Modulator



Promising efficacy data in ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor) combos in patients

with various cancer types after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-failure

Efficacy Potential in

ICI Failed Patients



SEED: Robust pipeline with lead oncology asset, an oral RBM39 degrader

entered phase 1 study; Investments and R&D Collaborations from Eli Lilly & Eisai

SEED: Novel TPD

Platform & Pipeline



Strong Global Patent Protections for Plinabulin and SEED Platform & Pipeline

Intellectual Property





Post-ICI Landscape: Severe Unmet Medical Need

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) Have Transformed Cancer Care
  • 60%

Progress on ICI

No effective therapies post-ICI



Around US$60B/year Success Story with a Critical Gap

  • Approved in 20+ cancer types

  • Nearly $60B in global annual sales

  • Have redefined first-line treatment in NSCLC and other solid tumors

    Current Options are Limited and Toxic
  • >60% patients develop "acquired resistance" due to T cell exhaustion and/or antigen presenting cell (APC) pathway alterations.1 After progression, ICIs are no longer recommended alone owing to limited efficacy

  • Current limited options include chemotherapy, which is associated with severe neutropenia

    Urgent Opportunity
  • No newly approved therapies specifically address ICI resistance/progression

  • Significant clinical and commercial opportunity

    1. Memon et al. Cancer Cell 42, 209-224 (2024).





Plinabulin: Unique Dual Mechanism with Immune and Safety Benefits
  • Reversible tubulin binder - distinct from taxanes, vincas, or colchicine; does not disrupt microtubule dynamics

  • Immune modulation - induces dendritic cell maturation and primes T cells by activating GEF-H1

  • Neutropenia mitigation - reduces chemotherapy-induced neutropenia by stimulating GMP progenitor cells

  • Positive benefit/risk Ratio: improve anti-cancer efficacy and tolerability in combination therapy



Plinabulin, a Differentiated Late-Stage Oncology Asset with Broad Potential

  • Robust clinical foundation: >700 cancer patients treated with good tolerability.

  • Unique MoA: Brain-penetrating, reversible tubulin binder driving dendritic cell maturation and T cell activation (Chem 2019, Cell Reports 2019, Med 2025); reduces chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (JAMA Oncology 2020). Synergizes with Chemo, ADC, radiation, and checkpoint inhibitors.

  • Extended patent protection: Composition of Matter (NCE) patent protection to 2036; Likely

    patent extension to 2041 based on Hatch-Waxman Act.

  • Validated benefit: Dublin-3 Phase 3 trial (n=559) demonstrated significant OS, PFS, ORR improvement with durable long-term survival benefits and significant reduction in grade 4 neutropenia in "Plinabulin + Docetaxel" vs Docetaxel in 2L/3L NSCLC EGFR WT (LANCET RM 2024).

  • Regulatory momentum: Per productive discussions with US FDA and EMA, we are in late-stage clinical development in non-squamous NSCLC after progression on PD-1/L1 inhibitors (Dublin-4 study), which is MoA-targeted, homogeneous and high-need patient group.

    Plinabulin Monohydrate is a Brain-Penetrant, Unique Tubulin Depolymerizing

    Agent which induces "Dendritic Cell or DC Maturation via GEF-H1 release"

    Plinabulin Monohydrate is a unique tubulin binder1

Plinabulin release GEF-H1 from microtubule, activates RhoA/ROCK pathway, leading to DC Maturation2,3

In WT DC cells, plinabulin can induce DC maturation, but not in GEF-H1 deleted DC cells2



1. La Sala et al., Chem 5(11): 2969-2986 (2019); 2. Kashyap et al., Cell Reports 28(13): 3367-3380 (2019); 3. Choi et al. Cell 189 (2): 461-477 (2026)

Plinabulin Displays GEF-H1-mediated Mechanism-of-Action



  • By depolymerizing microtubules, plinabulin activates GEF-H1, a C1 domain-associated RhoA activator, in a highly regulated and spatio-temporal dependent manner.1

  • As a GEF-H1 agonist, plinabulin has the

    following anti-cancer mechanism:

    1. GEF-H1 activates RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway and leads to DC maturation/M1 polarization and T-cell activation, which has been validated in preclinical and clinical studies.2-4

    2. GEF-H1 promotes proliferation of HSPCs biasing towards the GMP lineage during productive hematopoiesis, contributing to Plinabulin CIN prevention benefit.5-7

    3. Due to GEF-H1's role in vasculature, plinabulin

modulates angiogenesis.8-9

1. Choi SR (2026) Cell 189(2):461; 2. La Sala G (2019) Chem 5(11):2969; 3. Kashyap AS (2019) Cell Rep 28(13):3367; 4. Lin SH (2025) Med 10(6):100752; 5. Tonra JR (2020) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

85:461; 6. Blayney DW (2020) JAMA Oncol 6(11):e204429; 7. Chan DCH (2021) Blood Advances 5(16):3120; 8. Mita MM (2010) Clin Cancer Res. 16(23)1; 9. Risinger AL (2025) EMBO Mol Med 17(5):866.



Plinabulin-Responding Patients After ICI Failure Show Immune Activation Evidenced by Rapid DC Maturation in the Peripheral Blood

In 8 Cancers failed prior ICI, Plinabulin

combination with disease control rate of 54%1



CCR7, CD80 and CD83 are rapidly upregulated at cycle 1 Day 4

in responding (PR + SD) patients1



Dendritic Cell Maturation & Migration



1. Lin et al., Med 6(10):100752 (2025)

Non-Confidential

9





Plinabulin Improves Anti-cancer Efficacy and Increases Tolerability of Dato-DXd (TROP2-TOP1 ADC) with Increased CD8+ T cell/Treg Ratio (AACR 2026)

Plinabulin significantly improves complete response rate and survival of ADC

with or without PD-1 Inhibitor

Tumor Volume (mm3)

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Vehicle control

Tumor Volume (mm3)



3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Dato-DXd

CR: 0/10



Tumor Volume (mm3)

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Pembrolizumab

100

%Survival

80

60

40

Survival outcome

(non-tumor related deaths censored)



Vehicle control

Dato-DXd (5 mg/kg, QW)

Pembrolizumab (0.3 mg/kg, Q3D) Dato-DXd + Pembrolizumab

Dato-DXd + Plinabulin (7.5 mg/kg, BID on D1 + BIW)

0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days

Dato-DXd+Pembrolizumab*

0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days

Dato-DXd + Plinabulin

0

CR: 0/10



0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days

50

0

Dato-DXd

Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Plinabulin (Plin)

Dato-DXd+Pembro Dato-DXd+Plin

Dato-DXd+Pembro+Plin

100

ns

150

ns

ns

*

200

***

**

250

Vehicle control

✱ ✱✱

300

Day 7 (blood): CD8 T/Treg Ratio

✱✱



Dato-DXd+Pembrolizumab+Plinabulin**

20

0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days since First Administration

Dato-DXd + Pembrolizumab + Plinabulin

Tumor Volume (mm3)

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

CD8/Treg frequency ratio

0

CR: 5/10



0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days

3000

Tumor Volume (mm3)

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

CR: 2/10



0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days

3000

Tumor Volume (mm3)

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

CR: 6/10



0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Days

Plinabulin shifts tumor microenvironment to Immune Active by increasing CD8+ T cell/T reg ratio

*4/10 animals found dead

No animal death **1/10 animals found dead

hTROP2-MC38 colorectal cancer in hPD-1 mice

Plinabulin's Immunomodulation and Neutropenia-Mitigating Activities Position it as a Valuable Addition for Combination Regimens

Tumor Vasculature

Plinabulin targets

tumor vasculature



Plinabulin induces

DC maturation +

M1 Polarization



Improves safety*

Plinabulin reduces chemotherapy-induced neutropenia



Antigen Presenting Cell (APC)

Enhanced antigen presentation and T cell priming

Vascular Normalization

Improved therapeutic index of chemotherapy-based regimens

Target Acquired Resistance to ICI;

Antigen Presentation, Boost T cell function, Kill tumor cells, and Normalize vasculature

Extends chemo therapeutic

duration and improves anti-

cancer benefit



Plinabulin Clinical Studies in Multiple Cancers

>700 cancer patients treated with Plinabulin with good tolerability

Indication/Target

Program





Preclinical

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Registration

Trial Name / Collaborator

Late stage

NSCLC

(2nd/3rd line)

Plinabulin + Docetaxel

Study 103 (DUBLIN-3)

- OS, PFS, ORR benefit 1

CIN Prevention

Plinabulin alone or + Pegfilgrastim

Studies 105 & 106 2, 3

(PROTECTIVE-1 & PROTECTIVE-2)

NSCLC (2L/3L)

progressed on PD-1/L1

Inhibitor

Plinabulin + Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel

Study 303



ES-SCLC (1L)

Plinabulin + Pembrolizumab + Etoposide / Platinum

Study 302



Eight types of cancers Failed PD-1/L1 Inhibitor

Plinabulin + PD-1/PD-

L1 + Radiation



4

Breast Cancer

Plinabulin + ADC with topoisomerase inhibitors (TOP1-ADC)





  • Mechanisms not restricted to lung cancer; other solid tumors may benefit, with early signals in liver, head and neck, prostate, breast, and ES-SCLC.

1. Han et al., Lancet Resp Med 12(10): 775-786 (2024), 2. Blaney et al. JAMA Oncol 6(11): e204429 (2020);

3. Blaney et al. JAMA Network Open 5(1): e2145446 (2022); 4. Lin et al., Med 6(10):100752 (2025)



Post-ICI NSCLC: A Large, Growing and Unmet Clinical Challenge
  • Limited treatment options after PD-1/L1 inhibitor progression

  • Chemotherapy remains the main option, with poor outcome and high toxicity

  • Urgent need for differentiated therapy with immune re-sensitization



    Docetaxel Remains a Global Standard of Care (SOC) in Post-ICI NSCLC, EGFR WT, Despite Limited Benefit and Substantial Toxicity

    Current Standard of Care

    Docetaxel Overview

    • Approved >25 years ago

    • Remains the NCCN-recommended standard of care for 2L/3L NSCLC with no targetable alterations

    • Used after progression on anti-PD-(L)1 antibody

      ± chemotherapy

    • Used in real world practice across U.S., EU, Japan, and China

      Limitations

    • Median OS: ~9-11 months

    • 40% experience severe neutropenia

    Industry-wide Phase 3 Trials Summary

    11 Phase 3 Studies with no OS Benefit vs. Docetaxel

    • 7 global trials including ADCs and anti-PD-(L)1

      combos did not improve OS vs. docetaxel ¹

    • #8 failed global trial PRAGMATICA-LUNG (SWOG S2302) - ASCO 2025 2

      • N=838, randomized 1:1, Ramucirumab + pembrolizumab (mOS 10.1 Mo) vs. SOC (mOS 9.3 Mo), HR 0.99, p=0.46

    • #9 failed global trial COSTAR (GSK) - 07/2025

      • N=758, TIM-3 + PD-1 + docetaxel vs. PD-1 + docetaxel vs. docetaxel. Triple combo & combo did not improve OS vs. docetaxel

    • #10 failed global trial LATIFY (AZ) - 12/2025

      • N=594, Durvalumab + Ceralasertib (ATR

        inhibitor) did not improve OS vs. docetaxel.

    • #11 Prgm ended ABBIL1TY (Genmab) - 12/2025

      • N=702, Acasunlimab (PD-L1x4-1BB) +

1. Malinou J et al., ASCO 2024; 2. Dragnev KH etal. ASCO 2025

pembrolizumab vs Docetaxel



"Plinabulin and Docetaxel" Demonstrated Significant OS benefit vs. Docetaxel in a Global

Phase 3 Study with Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC EGFR WT Patients (Dublin-3, n=559)

Docetaxel + Plinabulin vs. Docetaxel + Placebo in Patients with EGFR Wild-Type NSCLC

  • Global, randomized, single-blinded (to patients)

  • Stratified by region (Asia/non-Asia), prior line (2L or 3L), ECOG (0-1/2), Prior PD-1/PD-L1

(yes/no)

Overall survival

(OS)

Primary endpoint

Study Plan

  • DoR

  • Q-TWiST; QoL

  • Proportion of patients who received docetaxel >8 cycles, >10 cycles and

>12 cycles

  • ORR, PFS

  • Percent of patients without severe neutropenia (Day 8, cycle 1)

  • Month 24 and 36 OS rate

Secondary endpoints

DP:

Docetaxel

(75 mg/m2, day 1)

+ Plinabulin

(30 mg/m2, day 1, 8)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-squamous or squamous NSCLC

  • Stage IIIb/IV

  • ECOG ≤ 2

  • Progression during or after treatment with one or two treatment regimens containing a platinum

  • Must have at least one measurable lung lesion

  • Prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy allowed

N=559

R

D:

Docetaxel

(75 mg/m2, day 1)

+ Placebo (day 1, 8)

1:1 ratio

21-day per cycle

Plinabulin IV Infusion: 1 or 2 dose per cycle

Publication: Lancet Respir Med 12(10): 775-786 (2024)



Plinabulin + Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel (n=559) Met its Primary Endpoint of OS and Secondary Endpoints of PFS, ORR, and Grade 4 Neutropenia Reduction

Grade 4 neutropenia, All Cycles Day 8

Plinabulin Significantly Reduced Grade 4 neutropenia of Docetaxel

Plinabulin and Docetaxel Showed Significant Improvement in Long-term OS Rate

- Double 2-year, 3-year OS Rate

OS HR=0.82

Log rank p=0.0399



P<0.0001

33.58%

5.13%

50%

Percentage of Patients

40%

30%

20%

10%

Mean OS (SE)

Median OS (95% CI)

HR

Docetaxel

12.77 (0.676)

9.4 (8.4, 10.7)

Plinabulin + Docetaxel

15.05 (0.848)

10.5 (9.3, 11.9)

0.82 (0.68, 0.99)

Publication: Lancet Respir Med 12(10): 775-786 (2024)

0%

Docetaxel +

Similar results for Grade 4 neutropenia on Cycle 1 Day 8

- Day 8 is ANC Nadir for Docetaxel

Placebo

Docetaxel +

Plinabulin 30 mg/m2

Plinabulin + Docetaxel (DP) is Safer Than Docetaxel (D) Adjusted by Exposure



The combination has Significant lower Grade 3 or 4 exposure-adjusted event rates vs. Docetaxel

Grade 3 or 4 Event Rates

Adjusted by Exposure

Grade 4 Only Event Rates

Adjusted by Exposure

DP (n=274)

D (n=278)

DP (n=274)

D (n=278)

Descriptive Statistics

Number of patients with events, n (%)

203 (74·1)

212 (76·3)

61 (22·3)

121 (43·5)

Total number of years of dose regimen

83·43

71·65

83·43

71·65

Total number of events

814

783

141

221

Observed event rate per year

9·76

10·93

1·69

3·08

Estimated event rate per year (95% CI)

9·76 (9·11, 10·45)

10·93 (10·19,

11·72)

1·69 (1·43, 1·99)

3·08 (2·70, 3·52)

Treatment Difference

RR vs Docetaxel + Placebo (95% CI)

0·89 (0·81, 0·98)

0·55 (0·44, 0·68)

P-value vs· Docetaxel + Placebo

0·0235

<0·0001

Plinabulin and Docetaxel Combo arm had more cycles of treatment vs. Docetaxel alone.

Publication: Lancet Respir Med 12(10): 775-786 (2024)



Dublin-3: Post-hoc Analysis in Plinabulin Mechanism-Based Population in

2L/3L Non-squamous EGFR WT NSCLC and Progressed on PD-1/L1 Inhibitors

Non-squamous

mOS extension of 2.5 months

(DP 11.4 vs. D 8.8 months, HR 0.72)

Non-squamous, progressed on ICI (Plinabulin MoA-enriched population)

mOS extension of 4.1 months (DP 15.8 vs. D 11.7 months, HR 0.55)

OS HR=0.72

Log rank p=0.0078

OS HR=0.55

Log rank p=0.076



Non-squamous

N

Median OS (95% CI) HR

Log rank P value

Non-squamous, post-ICI

N

Median OS (95% CI) HR

Log rank P value

Docetaxel 178 8.81 (7.73, 10.65)

Plinabulin +

154 11.37 (9.37, 12.95) 0.72 (0.57, 0.92) P = 0.0078

Docetaxel 25 11.7 (7.59, 13.77)

Docetaxel

Plinabulin + Docetaxel

22 15.8 (9.34, 29.06) 0.55 (0.28, 1.07) P = 0.076

Publication: Lancet Respir Med 12(10): 775-786 (2024)

Study 303 (Plinabulin + Docetaxel + PD-1) in 2L/3L Metastatic NSCLC Progressed on PD-1/L1 Inhibitors Shows Consistent Data as Dublin-3 Analysis

Primary Endpoint (n=47) - SITC 2025

Confirmed ORR(RECIST 1.1)

18.2%

Secondary Endpoint

Median PFS(RECIST 1.1)

7.0 months

Median OS

16 months+, Not reached

Median DoR(RECIST 1.1)

7.2 months

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

85.1%

12 months OS%

79%

24 months OS%

66%

Best Change (%) in Target Lesions



  • Median follow-up at data cutoff (30 September 2025) was 14.3 months.

    • IO Mechanism Support: Whole blood analysis indicated higher proportions of activated CD4+/CD8+ T-cells post treatment.

    • Clinically Meaningful Efficacy Data: 303 study data almost doubled efficacy vs. historical data of docetaxel in similar patients from TROPOIN LUNG-01 (Thoracic Oncology 43(3): 260-272 (2024)): ORR: 12.8%; mPFS: 3.7

      months; mOS: 11.8 months.

  • Median age was 67 (44-83); 80.9% male and 19.1% female. 72.3% were current or former smokers.

  • Histology included 63.8% with non-squamous cell carcinoma, 36.2% with squamous cell carcinoma.



    Planned Dublin-4 Study As a Confirmatory Phase 3 Study

    Plinabulin Mechanism-Enriched Patients

    Dublin-4: "Plinabulin + Docetaxel" vs. "Docetaxel" in 2L/3L non-squamous NSCLC, EGFR/ALK/ROSm/RET Wild Type, progressed on PD-1/L1 with PFS ≥ 3 months
    • Defined, homogeneous group with clear unmet need and Plinabulin MoA alignment

      Scientific Rationale
    • Tumor Vasculature Targeting: Plinabulin acts on tumor vasculature → Dublin-3 OS HR 0.72 in non-squamous NSCLC patients. Avastin, a vasculature targeting agent, only approved in non-squamous NSCLC patients.

    • Immune Re-sensitization: Plinabulin has the potential to overcome ICI "acquired resistance" due to T-cell exhaustion / APC pathway mutation1 by dendritic-cell (DC) maturation MoA. DC is the most potent APC → restores T-cell priming → strengthens the Cancer-Immunity Cycle.

      Supporting Clinical Data in NSCLC patients progressed on PD-1/L1 Inhibitors
    • Dublin-3 (DP): OS HR 0.55, mOS: 15.8 vs 11.7 months (Plinabulin + docetaxel DP vs docetaxel D), mPFS 5.6 vs. 3.8 months (HR 0.67), ORR 18.2% vs. 8.0%.

    • 303 Study (DP+PD-1): 24-month OS rate 66% (mOS 16 month+), mPFS 7.0 month, ORR 18.2%

1. Memon et al. Cancer Cell 42, 209-224 (2024).

Non-Confidential

Attention: This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.

Attachments

  • Original document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

BeyondSpring Inc. published this content on April 22, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on April 22, 2026 at 22:08 UTC.