Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company held on May 10, 2022, the votes cast with respect to each item of business properly presented at the meeting are as follows:

Proposal No. 1 - The shareholders elected each of the eleven nominees to the Board of Directors for a one-year term by the vote of the majority of votes cast, in accordance with 3M's Bylaws.



                                   FOR         AGAINST      ABSTAIN    BROKER NON-VOTE
1a. Thomas "Tony" K. Brown     366,547,581    9,131,914    1,214,728     89,360,560
1b. Pamela J. Craig            360,046,492    15,675,697   1,172,034     89,360,560
1c. David B. Dillon            368,297,324    7,384,796    1,212,103     89,360,560
1d. Michael L. Eskew           358,735,716    16,894,427   1,264,080     89,360,560
1e. James R. Fitterling        371,652,540    3,966,486    1,275,197     89,360,560
1f. Amy E. Hood                371,309,969    4,452,083    1,132,171     89,360,560
1g. Muhtar Kent                368,331,209    7,047,108    1,515,906     89,360,560
1h. Suzan Kereere              372,695,623    2,998,508    1,200,092     89,360,560
1i. Dambisa F. Moyo            368,846,366    6,834,399    1,213,458     89,360,560
1j. Gregory R. Page            342,407,782    33,253,888   1,232,553     89,360,560
1k. Michael F. Roman           351,700,363    23,801,467   1,392,393     89,360,560


Proposal No. 2 - The shareholders ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as 3M's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.



     FOR         AGAINST      ABSTAIN    BROKER NON-VOTE
 434,365,858    30,411,675   1,477,250         N/A



Proposal No. 3 - The shareholders gave an advisory approval of the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers as described in the Company's 2022 Proxy Statement.



     FOR         AGAINST      ABSTAIN    BROKER NON-VOTE
 330,389,409    43,650,536   2,854,278     89,360,560



Proposal No.4 - The shareholders did not approve the shareholder proposal on environmental costs reporting.*



     FOR          AGAINST      ABSTAIN    BROKER NON-VOTE
  49,617,159    318,434,074   8,842,990     89,360,560



Proposal No.5 - The shareholders did not approve the shareholder proposal on
China audit.*

     FOR          AGAINST      ABSTAIN    BROKER NON-VOTE
  12,226,850    357,945,686   6,721,687     89,360,560




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the affirmative "FOR" vote of a majority of those shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve the shareholder proposal. In tabulating the voting result, abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes are not counted as votes "FOR" or "AGAINST" the proposal. An abstention will, however, be counted as entitled to vote on a proposal and will, therefore, have the effect of a vote "AGAINST." Applying this standard, the percentage in favor of the shareholder proposal is calculated by dividing the number of FOR votes by the sum of the number of FOR, AGAINST and ABSTAIN votes.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses