Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
49.67 USD | -0.32% | -4.77% | +9.96% |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The company is one of the best yield companies with high dividend expectations.
- Upward revisions of sales forecast reflect a renewed optimism among the analysts covering the stock.
- For the past twelve months, EPS forecast has been revised upwards.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised upwards significantly.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- Based on current prices, the company has particularly high valuation levels.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- The appreciation potential seems limited due to the average target prices set by the analysts covering the stock.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Commercial REITs
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+9.96% | 3.22B | B+ | ||
-15.58% | 9.31B | A- | ||
+0.49% | 6.49B | C | ||
-9.24% | 4.88B | A+ | ||
-6.85% | 4.87B | B- | ||
+10.79% | 4.08B | B | ||
-2.11% | 4.09B | - | ||
-16.62% | 3.9B | A- | ||
-14.66% | 3.12B | B | ||
-1.19% | 3.05B | B |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- SLG Stock
- Ratings SL Green Realty Corp.