The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will soon scrutinize the Ontario Court of Appeal (the Court)'s interpretation of the term "material change" pursuant to the Securities Act.1

Background

In the 2022 Ontario Supreme Court decision, the motion judge dismissed a proposed class action related to Lundin Mining Corporation (Lundin)'s alleged failure to provide timely disclosure of material information, on the basis that there was no reasonable possibility of showing that the information at issue constituted a "material change" in Lundin's business.2 On appeal, the Court overturned the lower court's decision, adopting a more expansive interpretation of material change.3 On March 28, 2024, the SCC granted Lundin leave to appeal.

Key Takeaways and Next Steps

The SCC's decision will hopefully provide clarity to the longstanding uncertainty around what constitutes a material change. For additional information, contact any member of our Business Law Group.

Footnotes

1 Securities Act, RSO. 1990, c S5.

2 Markowich v Lundin Mining Corp, 2022 ONSC 81.

3 Lundin Mining Corporation, et al v Dov Markowich, 2023 ONCA 359.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Ms Mardi McNaughton
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
Suite 2400
525 8th Ave SW
Calgary
AB T2P 1G1
CANADA
Tel: 403260 0268
Fax: 403260 0332
E-mail: jshauf@bdplaw.com>
URL: www.bdplaw.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2024 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing