End-of-day quote
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.3 MYR | 0.00% | 0.00% | -24.05% |
03-22 | Astro Malaysia's Profit, Revenue Drop in Fiscal Q4; Shares Rise 3% | MT |
03-22 | Astro Malaysia Seeks Seeks Shareholder Nod to Renew Transactions Authority; Shares Rise 3% | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 8.31 and 8.52 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2025 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.
- Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.
- The company is one of the best yield companies with high dividend expectations.
- The opinion of analysts covering the stock has improved over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Broadcasting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-24.05% | 328M | B | ||
+24.85% | 207B | B+ | ||
+9.98% | 16.08B | - | ||
-19.47% | 8.36B | C | ||
-15.67% | 7.93B | C | ||
0.00% | 4.58B | - | ||
+37.01% | 4.24B | B- | ||
+11.41% | 3.5B | B+ | ||
+46.62% | 2.68B | B- | ||
+18.46% | 2.55B | D |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ASTRO Stock
- Ratings Astro Malaysia Holdings