Following the
The case could have significant implications for AI computing systems, which are expected to grow only more prevalent in 2024. There could also be reverberations for users of Google's Pixel smartphones (such as your own correspondent!), which incorporate a version of Google's TPU-powered Tensor computer chips.
THE TECHNOLOGY
Machine learning models (such as convolutional neural networks) can be extremely computationally expensive to train and run. With large tech companies like Google and Microsoft in the process of rolling out AI-based services to their tens of millions of customers, there is huge potential for new computer architectures which can run such services more efficiently.
Singular's patents claim improvements relating to Low-Precision,
LPHDR systems can perform a high number of calculations every processor cycle, but these calculations are lower-precision (meaning that each calculated answer may differ more greatly from the true mathematical result). In fact, LPHDR processors used in an AI software program can still enable that AI software program to function correctly, even when up to 10% of the total number of calculations performed each differ by up to 0.2% from their respective exact results.
DAMAGES AND WILFUL INFRINGEMENT
Singular's multi-billion-dollar damages claim rests upon these efficiency savings. By infringing Singular's patented LPHDR architectures, Singular allege that Google were able to avoid needing to otherwise double its computing footprint, in order to support the search giant's ever-growing use of AI. That would have meant building a dozen more dedicated data centres in the US alone, at the cost of billions of dollars.
Moreover, Singular allege that Google wilfully infringed the patents, meaning that Google knew (or should have known) that the patents existed and that Google's activities would fall within the scope. Singular allege that
Some countries can allow increased damages where infringement is shown to be wilful rather than simply innocent or accidental. In the US, where patent infringement cases are heard by juries, demonstrating wilful infringement may win a claimant increased sympathy and hence a bigger payout (or simply a greater chance of the jury finding infringement).
WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS OF SINGULAR VS GOOGLE?
In their pre-trial pleadings, Google alleged that a win for Singular could see the smaller company awarded up to
When
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
262 High Holborn
WC1V 7EE
Tel: 115 955 2211
Fax: 330808 5191
E-mail: dalal.rahman@potterclarkson.com
URL: www.potterclarkson.com
© Mondaq Ltd, 2024 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source