Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
12.33 USD | +2.41% | +3.01% | -34.41% |
05-30 | V.F. Corporation Appoints Sun Choe as Global Brand President, Vans | CI |
05-28 | UBS Adjusts Price Target on VF to $12 From $14, Maintains Neutral Rating | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- With regards to fundamentals, the enterprise value to sales ratio is at 0.93 for the current period. Therefore, the company is undervalued.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company sustains low margins.
- The group shows a rather high level of debt in proportion to its EBITDA.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Apparel & Accessories
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-34.41% | 4.79B | B+ | ||
-0.78% | 137B | - | A- | |
-40.77% | 38.14B | C | ||
+9.80% | 17.93B | A | ||
+28.60% | 11.59B | B | ||
+42.02% | 9.35B | C | ||
-2.63% | 6.71B | C- | ||
+28.77% | 6.48B | B | ||
-5.83% | 6.51B | A- | ||
+16.50% | 6.3B | A |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- VFC Stock
- Ratings V.F. Corporation