Flotetuzumab as Salvage Therapy for Primary Induction

Failure and Early Relapse Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Ibrahim Aldoss, MD; Geoffrey L. Uy, MD; Norbert Vey, MD, PhD; Ashkan Emadi, MD, PhD; Peter H. Sayre, MD, PhD; Roland B. Walter, MD, PhD, MS; Matthew C Foster, MD; Martha L. Arellano, MD; John E. Godwin, MD; Matthew J. Wieduwilt, MD, PhD; Michael Byrne, DO; Laura Michaelis, MD; Patrick J. Stiff, MD; Matteo Giovanni Carrabba, MD; Patrice Chevallier, MD, PhD; Emmanuel Gyan, MD, PhD; Christian Recher MD, PhD;

Anjali S. Advani, MD; Martin Wermke, MD; Harry Erba, MD, PhD; Fabio Ciceri, MD; Gerwin A Huls, MD, PhD; Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic, MD, PhD; Max S. Topp, MD, PhD; Farhad Ravandi, MD; Stefania Paolini, MD; Antonio Curti, MD, PhD; Michael P. Rettig, PhD; John Muth, MS; Teia Curtis, BA; Marybeth Collins, BS; Erin Fehr, BS; Kuo Guo, MSc; Jian Zhao, PhD; Kathy Tran, BS; Patrick Kaminker, PhD; Priyanka Patel, Pharm D.;

Ouiam Bakkacha, MD; Kenneth Jacobs, MD; Maya Kostova, PhD; Jennifer Seiler, PhD, RAC; Bob Löwenberg, MD, PhD; Sergio Rutella, MD, PhD, FRCPath; Ezio Bonvini, MD; Jan K Davidson-Moncada, MD, PhD; John F. DiPersio, MD, PhD

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02152956 Abstract # 331

1

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Disclosures

2

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Flotetuzumab (MGD006): CD123 × CD3 Bispecific DART® Molecule

  • CD123: low-affinityIL-3 receptor (IL3Rα)
    • Normally expressed on plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), basophils, monocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs)
    • Over-expressedon leukemic stem cells (LSCs) in AML and other hematologic malignancies
  • Flotetuzumab:
    • Investigational bispecific molecule that co-engages T cells (anti-CD3) with a tumor associated antigen (CD123)
    • Designed to:
      • Redirect T cells to kill tumor cells
      • Recognize tumors independent of TCR & MHC
    • Phase 1 dose escalation completed1
    • Patients currently being enrolled in registrational study

Flotetuzumab

Chain 1

H2N-

VL1

VH2

-COOH

Cys

Chain 2

H2N-

VL2

VH1

-COOH

Cys

Anti-CD3Anti-CD123

(1) Uy, et al., Blood 2020

3

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

~50% of AML Patients Are Refractory to Induction Therapy or Have Short Remission

Fit for Intensive Chemo (50%)

Goal is complete remission

Induction

"7+3" ± Midostaurin or Gemtuzumab

(1-2 cycles)

Vyxeos (secondary AML)

AML

~46,000 new cases (G7 countries1)

Unfit for Intensive Chemo (50%) Goal is to extend survival

HMA ± Venetoclax

Glasdegib+ LDAC

Ivosidenib

Consolidation / Transplant

No agents

No CR

CR < 6

specifically approved

months

for this population

Primary Induction

Early Relapse

Failure (PIF)

(ER6)

CR > 6 months

Late Relapsed

(LR)

Salvage Chemo

Clinical TrialsHMA +/- Venetoclax

Targeted Agents (FLT3, IDH1/2)

(1) G7 countries: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom and United States

4

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Historical CR/CRh Rates in PIF/ER6 Range from 5% to 12%

Median expected overall survival of ~3.5 months

Meta-analysis of PIF/ER6 Pts (n=1328)

Aggregate PIF/ER6 Data

Extracted From Published Reports1

from Clinical Trials (n=686)

CR/CRh is 11.7% [95% CI = 9.2%, 14.6%]

CR/CRh is 5.3%

Total Population

n = 686

Received "curative" induction therapy?

No

Yes

n = 69

n = 617

Achieved CR/CRi/CRh?

Yes

No

n = 399

PIF cohort

n = 218

Relapse ≥ 6 months?

Unknown

Yes

No

LR cohort

ER6 cohort

Dropped n = 30

n = 212

n = 157

PIF

ER6

LR

CR/CRh

4.1% (9)

7.0% (11)

11.4% (22)

5.3% (20)

(1) Unpublished analysis of CLASSIC I, VALOR, ADMIRAL trials and add'l trials that included venetoclax, mylotarg

5

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

TME Immune Infiltration Associated with Cytarabine-Based Induction Failure

Vadakekolathu J, et al. Sci Trans Med 2020

6

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

TME Immune Infiltration Associated with Responsiveness to Flotetuzumab

Immune

Immune

% (n)

Infiltrated

Depleted

(n=53)

(n=22)

Population:

PIF

52.8% (28)

18.2% (4)

ER6

13.2% (7)

18.2% (4)

LR

34.0% (18)

63.6% (14)

Response:

24.5% (13)

CR/CRh/CRi

13.6% (3)

Median BM change (%)

-54%

+20%

Immune-infiltrated

at baseline

Immune-depleted

at baseline

7

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Flotetuzumab in PIF/ER6 AML: Design of Ongoing Registrational Study

Dose Escalation

Expansion Cohort

n=47

Relapsed/Refractory AML

Primary Induction Failure

Recommended Phase 2

& Early Relapse AML

Dose (RP2D) n=50

Key Entry Criteria

  • Primary Induction Failure (PIF): refractory to cytarabine-based chemotherapy, venetoclax-based combinations or gemtuzumab ozogamicin
  • Early relapse (ER6): First relapse with initial CR duration of < 6 months
  • Maximum of 3 prior lines of therapy
  • No prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

Study Objectives

  • Primary: Complete remission (CR) and/or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate
  • Secondary: mDOR, rate of transfusion independence, time in hospital

8

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Flotetuzumab in PIF/ER6 AML: Demographics

Analysis of all PIF/ER pts (per previous definition) treated at RP2D1

Characteristic

Population (n=44)2

Age, Median (range)

63.5 (28.0, 81.0)

Gender, Female

13 (29.5)

Disease Status at Study Entry

27 (61.4)

Primary Induction Failure

Cytarabine based induction chemotherapy

20 (74.1)

Alternative induction therapy

7 (25.9)

Early Relapse

17 (38.6)

Median duration of CR1 (range)

3.3 months (0.8-5.7)

ELN Risk Stratification (2017)

Adverse

32

(72.7%)

Intermediate

11

(25.0%)

Favorable

1

(2.3%)

Secondary AML

16

(36.4%)

Number of Prior Lines of Therapy, median (range)

2.0 (1.0, 3.0)

Baseline BM Blasts Median (Range)3

34.5 (5.0, 84)

(1)

Recommended Phase 2 Dose = multistep-LID C1W1 followed by 500ng/kg/day continuous infusion through induction

(2)

Including ruxolitinib mini-cohort - see Abstract # 2817: "Prophylactic Ruxolitinib for Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in Relapse/Refractory (R/R) AML Patients Treated with Flotetuzumab"

(3)

A patient confirmed with AML by IHC not included in baseline BM analysis

Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

9

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Flotetuzumab in PIF/ER6 AML: Safety

Treatment Related Adverse Events1

Total RP2D Population (n=44)

All n (%)

Grade 3 n (%)

IRR/CRS2

44 (100)

1 (2.3)

Rash

17 (38.6)

Arthralgia

11 (25.0)

Diarrhoea

9 (20.5)

2 (4.5)

Nausea

9 (20.5)

Pyrexia

8 (18.2)

Decreased appetite

8 (18.2)

Oedema peripheral

7 (15.9)

Febrile neutropenia

6 (13.6)

6 (13.6)

Fatigue

6 (13.6)

1 (2.3)

Alanine aminotransferase increased

6 (13.6)

2 (4.5)

Aspartate aminotransferase increased

6 (13.6)

1 (2.3)

Headache

5 (11.4)

Myalgia

5 (11.4)

(1)

Events occurring >10%; Toxicity grading is based on CTCAE criteria version 4.0

(2)

Toxicity grading for events of IRR/CRS (infusion-related reaction and cytokine release syndrome) is based upon modified grading scale proposed by Lee, et al.

Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

10

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

CRS Frequency Decreased with Time on Treatment

  • Most CRS events (52%) occurred in first week of treatment during step-up dosing
  • Incidence of CRS progressively decreased during dosing, allowing outpatient treatment after day 8

total)of(%

100

500

Flotetuzumab

75

400

300

eventsCRS

50

(ng/kg/day*)

200

25

100

0

0

1

2

3

4

5

Time (weeks)

* Planned dose; Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

11

Neurologic Events Are of Short Duration and Fully Reversible

  • Neurologic AEs have been infrequent, and mostly mild to moderate in severity
  • Three pts experienced Grade 3 confusion of short duration (1-2 days) that was fully reversible

Neurological and Psychiatric Adverse Events1 (n=44)

All Adverse Events n (%)

Treatment Related AEs n(%)

All

Grade 3

All

Grade 3

Headache

13

(29.5)

5 (11.4)

Dizziness

9 (20.5)

1 (2.3)

3 (6.8)

1 (2.3)

Insomnia

8 (18.2)

Confusional state

7 (15.9)

3 (6.8)

3 (6.8)

3 (6.8)

Anxiety

7 (15.9)

1 (2.3)

Paraesthesia

4

(9.1)

2 (4.5)

Tremor

4

(9.1)

2 (4.5)

Depression

4

(9.1)

1 (2.3)

Lethargy

3

(6.8)

(1) Events occurring ≥2 individuals; Toxicity grading is based on CTCAE criteria version 4.0

Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

12

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Flotetuzumab: Active in Primary Induction Failure & Early Relapsed AML Patients

  • 59.1% (26/44) of pts had evidence of reduction in blast count with median decrease of 81.0% in BM blasts
  • Median time to first response was 1 cycle (range: 1-3 cycles)

Best BM Change (%)

125

%(n)

PIF/ER (n=44)

PIF (n=27)

ER6 (n=17)

100

CR/CRh

25.0%

(11)

33.3% (9)

11.8% (2)

CR/CRh/CRi

31.8%

(14)

37.0% (10)

23.5% (4)

75

MLFS

6.8%

(3)

3.7% (1)

11.8% (2)

OB/SD

25.0%

(11)

25.9% (7)

23.5% (4)

50

HSCT

57.1% (8/14)

70.0% (7/10)

25.0% (1/4)

25

Median BM Reduction (%)

-81

-83

-13

0

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

* *

-25

-50

-75

* HSCT

-100

Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

13

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Flotetuzumab: Active in TP53MUT PIF/ER6 AML Patients

  • 59.1% (26/44) of pts had evidence of reduction in blast count with median decrease of 81.0% in BM blasts
  • Median time to first response was 1 cycle (range: 1-3 cycles)

Best BM Change (%)

125

100

75

50

25

0

-25

-50

-75

-100

%(n)

PIF/ER (n=44)

PIF (n=27)

ER6 (n=17)

TP53MUT (n=10)

CR/CRh

25.0%

(11)

33.3% (9)

11.8% (2)

30.0% (3)

CR/CRh/CRi

31.8%

(14)

37.0%

(10)

23.5% (4)

50.0% (5)

MLFS

6.8%

(3)

3.7%

(1)

11.8% (2)

10.0% (1)

OB/SD

25.0%

(11)

25.9% (7)

23.5% (4)

20.0% (2)

HSCT

57.1% (8/14)

70.0% (7/10)

25.0% (1/4)

60.0% (3/5)

Median BM Reduction (%)

-81

-83

-13

-74

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

* *

TP53MUT

* HSCT

Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

Poster Presentation Abstract ID# 136919: TP53 Abnormalities Correlate with Immune Infiltration and Associate with Response To Flotetuzumab Immunotherapy In Acute Myeloid Leukemia

14

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Duration of Response & Overall Survival in PIF/ER6 AML Responders (CR/CRh/CRi)

Percent Survival

100

50

0

Duration of Response (months)

mDOR 8.13 months

100

PIF mDOR 15.2 months

Survival

50

ER6 mDOR 2.4 months

Precent

0

0

12

24

36

Duration of Response (months)

0

12

24

36

Percent Survival

100

50

0

0

Overall Survival (months)

mOS 10.7 months

100

PIF mOS 15.9 months

Survival

50

ER6 mOS 5.0 months

Percent

0

0

12

24

36

Overall Survival (months)

12

24

36

Data cut-off Nov 10th, 2020

15

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Conclusions

  • Flotetuzumab treatment in AML showed manageable safety profile
    • Manageable CRS and minimal neurological toxicity
    • Single patient with Grade 3 IRR/CRS
    • Required minimum 8-day inpatient hospitalization
  • Flotetuzumab demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with PIF/ER6 AML, a population with poor prognosis and high unmet medical need
    • 31.8% Complete remission rate (CR/CRh/CRi), over half of those went on to successful stem cell transplant
    • Historical data indicate CR/CRh rate to salvage therapy of 5-12% for PIF/ER6 AML patients
  • Registrational study is currently enrolling PIF/ER6 AML patients [NCT02152956]

16

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the patients who participated in this study and their families

Clinical trial teams at the study centers:

Max S. Topp , MD, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg; Martin Wermke, MD,Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden; Norbert Vey, MD, Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Fabio Ciceri, MD, Matteo Carraba, MD, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele; Stefania Paolini, MD, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi; Gerwin A. Huls, MD, University Medical Center Groningen; Bob Lowenberg, MD, Mojca Jongen-Lavrenic, MD, Erasmus University Medical Center; Geoffrey L. Uy, MD, Washington University School of Medicine; Harry Erba, MD PhD, Duke University Medical Center; Martha Arellano, MD, Emory University School of Medicine; Matthew C. Foster, MD, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; John Godwin, MD, Providence Cancer Center; Farhard Ravandi-Kashani, MD, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center Department of Leukemia; Kendra Sweet, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center; Peter Sayre, MD, University of California, San Francisco; Anjali Advani, MD, Cleveland Clinic; Matthew Wieduwilt, MD, UCSD Moores Cancer Center; Ibrahim Aldoss, MD, City of Hope National Medical Center; Michael T. Byrne, DO, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Ashkan Emadi, MD, University of Maryland; Laura Michaelis, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin; Kristen Petit, MD, University of Michigan; Roland Walter, MD, PhD, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Jessica Altman, MD, Northwestern Medicine

NANOSTRING

JVGCRC, NTU

Sarah E. Church

MacroGenics Study Team

Sergio Rutella

Tressa Hood

Carmen Ballesteros-Merino

Sarah E. Warren

Stephen Reeder (GEP)

Carlo B. Bifulco

Jayakumar Vadakekolathu (GEP)

Bernard A. Fox

Please email your questions to ialdoss@coh.org

17

2020 ASH Annual Meeting

Attachments

  • Original document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

MacroGenics Inc. published this content on 06 December 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 07 December 2020 09:14:06 UTC