Introduction
he matter in hand is in between
New Balance's Global Presence and Enforcement Actions
New Balance stressed on the fact it had been using the 'N' emblem since the 1970s. it emphasied on its strong foreign business, big revenues, large advertising expenditures, and massive sponsorships of important sports events with celebrity endorsements. The highlighted the fact that its subsidiary firms were strongely indulged in promotions and ads, and it had a well-established market presence in
it has been alleged that the defendant,
Defiance and Further Legal Measures
J.K enterprise in disregard of court's previous ruling and in contravention of promise to not use the challenged logo, continuously disregarded the orders form the court. . The plaintiff,
In an effort to prevent the defendant from using the disputed marks, the court granted an interim order during the early phases of the litigation process. In the initial stages of the litigation, the court granted interim order to prevent the defendant from using the disputed marks. The defendant continuously violated the court's injunction despite court's explicit and unambiguous language.
Local Comissioner was ordered by the court to visit the defendants's location to investigate the materials and goods that bear the disputed marks.he then filed a report that included a detailed explanation of how widely the defendants commercial activities used the contested emblems.
The report was a detailed piece of evidence that demonstrated the defendants disregard for the court's order. The Local commissioner confirmed the extent of defendants's contempt for the law and court's authority by widespread use of the mark. The plaintiff then, proceded with further legal action in light of defendants repeated breach, by citing Order 39 Rule 2A. this rule gives remedy to the wronged party who has been wronged further when the other party disregards the conditions of an injunction or interim order.
Well-Known
the court recognised new balance's 'N' shaded logo's well -known status with the help of various judicial pronouncements. In the case of
The factors enumerated in Section 11(6) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which were highlighted in the
- The extent to which the trademark is acknowledged or recognized in the relevant section of the public, encompassing knowledge acquired in
India through promotional activities.
- The period, scale, and geographic scope of the trademark's utilization.
- The duration, extent, and geographical area of promotional activities, including advertising, publicity, and presentations at fairs or exhibitions.
- The duration and geographic area of any registration or application for registration of the trademark under the Trademarks Act, reflecting its use or recognition.
- The record of successful enforcement of the rights in the trademark, especially recognition as a well-known mark by courts or the Registrar."
Evidence submitted in the court along with the statements made during proceeddings were carefully examined in order for court to apply these standards to the current case. The court held that New Balance widely and extensively used the the N logo in the footwear industry. The plaintiff used the 'N' shaded emblem extensively and widely, the court said, especially in the footwear and garment industries. The plaintiff provided proof of the logo's identification, usage history, and geographic reach, both domestically and internationally—to support its claims. The court held the N shaded mark as a well known mark due to its uniqueness and broad identification.
Conclusion and Court's Directive
The judgement in the given matter is given by Justice
Since the case was concluded early, the court showed expediency in providing justice by grating the plaintiff 50 percent of the courts cost. The court recognized plainitff's inittaitve in promoting a an effective settlement of the matter in hand. Also, all the concerns regarding the matter were expediently resolved. there remain no answered questions as the court very methodically handled the case . with this, the issue between JK Enterprise and New Balance was officially settled which brought an end to the litigation.
Footnote
1. (2023) Livelaw (Del) 148
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Mr
Khurana and Khurana
E-13, UPSIDC, Site-IV, Behind-Grand Venice
Tel: 1204296878
Fax: 1204516201
E-mail: tarun@khuranaandkhurana.com
URL: www.khuranaandkhurana.com
© Mondaq Ltd, 2024 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source