Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
1.12 CHF | +8.11% | +20.43% | -47.02% |
01:08pm | AMS-OSRAM : Buy rating from Jefferies | ZD |
04-26 | AMS OSRAM : Q1 24: with the microLED project now behind us, a focus on stability |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The company is one of the most undervalued, with an "enterprise value to sales" ratio at 0.66 for the 2024 fiscal year.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.
Weaknesses
- According to forecast, a sluggish sales growth is expected for the next fiscal years.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Semiconductors
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-47.02% | 1.12B | B+ | ||
+77.06% | 2,159B | B- | ||
+20.01% | 623B | C | ||
+34.06% | 622B | A- | ||
+8.76% | 254B | B- | ||
+16.17% | 185B | B- | ||
+5.07% | 162B | A- | ||
-37.46% | 136B | C+ | ||
+34.27% | 127B | B+ | ||
+37.24% | 105B | - | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- AMS Stock
- Ratings ams-OSRAM AG