Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Set forth below are the proposals voted on at the Annual Meeting, and the final voting results certified by First Coast on January 5, 2022. The final voting results on each of the proposals, as reported by First Coast, are as follows:

Proposal 1: Election of two directors to serve as Class A directors on the Board to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or until successors have been duly elected and qualified.





                              For      Withhold   Broker Non-Votes
Raphael Hofstein, Ph.D.    7,031,321    83,753           -
David S. Battleman, M.D.   7,031,640    83,434           -
Mordechai Saar Hacham      8,276,505   189,999           -
Joshua Levine              8,276,338   190,166           -

Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year.





   For       Against    Abstain   Broker Non-Votes
7,923,146   8,408,089    8,736           -


Item 8.01 Other Events

On January 3, 2022, Ira Scott Greenspan, Robert Gibson and Joshua Lamstein filed a Verified Complaint pursuant to Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporation Law challenging the results of the Annual Meeting, on the basis that, among other things, (i) Morris Laster, Gabriella Laster, Sara Laster and Chen Laster (collectively the "Lasters") improperly voted six million shares of the Company's common stock at the Annual Meeting (the "Disputed Shares") because the Lasters do not own the Disputed Shares over which the Lasters improperly and incorrectly claimed ownership, and (ii) the Lasters would have not succeeded at the Annual Meeting but for the fact they improperly voted the Disputed Shares given that an overwhelming majority (more than 90%) of unaffiliated stockholders' votes were in favor of the incumbent directors. The Lasters' slate of directors would still have been defeated notwithstanding his vote of 3.5 million shares for which he was given a one-time proxy-i.e., but for the Lasters' vote of the 2.5 million shares that they do not own and for which they did not receive a proxy, the incumbent directors would have retained their seats-thus allowing the votes of the Lasters to dictate the outcome of the Annual Meeting and contradict the will of the Company's unaffiliated stockholders.

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses