Fitch Ratings has upgraded state-owned PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk's (BRI) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BBB' from 'BBB-'.

At the same time, Fitch Ratings Indonesia has upgraded BRI's National Long-Term Rating to 'AAA(idn)' from 'AA+(idn)'. The Outlooks are Stable. Fitch has also upgraded the ratings on the bank's US dollar-denominated senior unsecured notes to 'BBB' from 'BBB-'. A full list of rating actions follows below.

The rating actions reflect Fitch's reassessment of the government's propensity to support the bank, given the bank's more prominent role in supporting a government programme after its appointment as the holding company for state-owned ultra-micro lenders in 2021, which further entrenched its long-standing role in developing Indonesia's micro and small businesses. This led to the upgrade of BRI's Government Support Rating (GSR), which drives its IDRs and National Ratings, to 'bbb' from 'bbb-'.

'AAA' National Long-Term Ratings denote the highest rating assigned by the agency in its National Rating scale for that country. This rating is assigned to issuers or obligations with the lowest expectation of default risk relative to all other issuers or obligations in the same country.

'F1' National Short-Term Ratings indicate the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country. Under the agency's National Rating scale, this rating is assigned to the lowest default risk relative to others in the same country. Where the liquidity profile is particularly strong, a '+' is added to the assigned rating.

Key Rating Drivers

Government Support Underpins Rating: BRI's Long-Term IDR is underpinned by Fitch's belief of a high probability that extraordinary government support will be forthcoming, if required. The assessment is based on BRI's systemic importance as the second-largest commercial bank in Indonesia, its strategic state ownership, as well as its role as the bank that supports the Indonesian micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME) segment.

High Support Ability: Fitch believes the government of Indonesia (BBB/Stable) is able to support the country's domestic systemically important banks, including BRI. This belief takes into consideration Indonesia's small banking-sector assets relative to its GDP and moderate sovereign financial flexibility, balanced by a high proportion of the banking-system assets owned by banks that may rely on the government's support in times of stress.

High Support Propensity: BRI's GSR reflects Fitch's expectation of the government's increasing propensity to provide extraordinary support to BRI, if needed. This is based on the government's emphasis on developing the MSME sector, exemplified by supportive regulations and a rising budget allocation to the government-sponsored MSME lending programme known as KUR. BRI is also spearheading the government's financial inclusion targets and distribution of social security benefits due to its extensive distribution network, which we believe would be very difficult to replace.

Stable Operating Environment Outlook: Fitch expects the operating environment (OE) for Indonesian banks to be stable in the near future, as GDP growth is likely to be resilient in 2023 and 2024, which should support the industry's loan demand and asset quality. We have maintained the OE score at 'bb+' with a stable outlook. The OE score is higher than the implied score in the 'b' category due to a positive adjustment for Indonesia's sovereign rating, reflecting greater market and economic stability than the core metrics imply.

Strong Indonesian Franchise: BRI's business profile is assessed at 'bbb', in line with its implied score, reflecting its robust domestic franchise, signified by its market-leading operating income and very high market share in its core operating segment of MSME lending. This is complemented by adequate revenue diversification and management quality that is comparable with that of most of its large bank peers.

Improving Asset-Quality Metrics: Fitch expects BRI's reported non-performing loan (NPL) ratio to improve gradually, helped by the selective extension of regulatory forbearance and healthy - albeit moderating - economic growth. Our assessment of BRI's asset-quality score of 'bb' also considers the bank's high loan-loss allowance (LLA) coverage, which covers 279% of its NPLs and 46% of loans at risk (LAR) as of September 2022.

Sustained Profitability Recovery: Fitch believes BRI's profitability will benefit from high loan growth and lower credit costs given our expectations for asset-quality improvement and adequate LLA coverage. We expect pressure on BRI's net interest margin from rising interest rates to be partly offset by increasing lending yields due to continued expansion into micro lending.

BRI's earnings and profitability score is maintained at 'bb+', in line with the implied score, with the outlook revised to positive from stable due to our expectations of a higher operating profit to risk-weighted asset ratio in the next 12-18 months.

Satisfactory Capital Buffers: BRI's common equity Tier 1 ratio of 25.1% provides the bank with a satisfactory buffer against potential asset-quality deterioration. We expect high loan growth to gradually erode capital and BRI to continue paying large dividends as it seeks to achieve better returns on capital. However, Fitch expects BRI to maintain higher capitalisation than its large bank peers. We have maintained BRI's capitalisation and leverage score at 'bbb-' with a stable outlook.

Stable Funding Profile: Fitch expects BRI to maintain satisfactory liquidity at reasonable costs to support the group's operations. BRI's funding and liquidity score of 'bbb-' is assigned above its implied score and reflects Fitch's view of its deposit franchise that is comparable with that of other large domestic banks. We have used its deposit structure to adjust the score, given our belief that BRI's granular deposit structure and relatively cheap cost of deposits confer a competitive advantage.

Rating Sensitivities

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

A downgrade of Indonesia's sovereign rating is likely to lead to a downgrade of BRI's GSR and IDRs. A downgrade could also come from a perceived weakening of the sovereign's ability or propensity to support Indonesian banks. A downgrade of BRI's National Long-Term Rating could also arise from a weakening in its overall credit profile relative to the national-rating universe of Indonesian financial institutions.

BRI's Viability Rating (VR) could be downgraded if its financial profile deteriorates materially, which could result from a simultaneous and/or multi-notch downgrade in its key rating drivers. This would most likely happen if we lower the OE score for Indonesia's banks, but we believe this to be unlikely in the next 12-24 months.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

An upgrade of Indonesia's sovereign rating could lead to an upgrade of BRI's GSR and IDRs. There is no upside for BRI's National Ratings as they are already at the highest point on the scale.

Positive action on BRI's VR would most likely result from an improvement in the bank's asset quality, such that we believe its NPL ratio can be sustained below 2% and supplemented by improvements in other asset-quality metrics, such as loans at risk, or restructured loans, to total loans. A positive revision on the OE score may also result in an upgrade of BRI's VR.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: KEY RATING DRIVERS

BRI's foreign currency-denominated senior unsecured bonds are rated at the same level as its Long-Term IDR in accordance with Fitch's Bank Rating Criteria, as the bonds constitute its direct, unsubordinated and senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all its other senior unsecured obligations, and the risk of default of these obligations is aligned with that of BRI.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

A downgrade of BRI's IDR would lead to a corresponding downgrade of the issue ratings.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

An upgrade of BRI's IDR would lead to a corresponding upgrade of the issue ratings.

VR ADJUSTMENTS

The VR has been assigned below the implied VR due to the following adjustment reason(s): weakest link - asset quality (negative)

The OE score of 'bb+' has been assigned above the 'b' category implied score on the following adjustment reason: sovereign rating (positive)

The funding and liquidity score of 'bbb-' has been assigned above the 'bb' category implied score on the following adjustment reason: deposit structure (positive)

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings

BRI's IDRs and GSR are driven by our expectation of extraordinary sovereign support and are credit-linked to Indonesia's sovereign ratings.

ESG Considerations

BRI has an ESG Relevance Score of '3' for Human Rights, Community Relations, Access and Affordability, which differs from the standard score for financial institutions of '2'. This reflects BRI's exposure to underbanked and underserved communities, which is credit relevant to the bank, but has very little impact on its rating.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg

(C) 2023 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire