CT141 | mRNA-4157 (V940) Individualized Neoantigen Therapy + Pembrolizumab in Advanced |
Unresectable HPV-negative Head and Neck Carcinoma: Clinical and Translational Analysis | |
Julie E. Bauman,1 Ricklie A. Julian,2 Jessica L. Geiger,3 Janice M. Mehnert,4 Jeffrey M. Clarke,5 Manish R. Patel,6,7 Martin Gutierrez,8 Justin F. Gainor,9 Shyam Srivats,10 Zhaojie Zhang,10 | |
Anjali Rao,10 Vasudha Sehgal,10 Peijie Hou,10 Manju Morrissey,10 Igor Feldman,10 Lakshmi Srinivasan,10 Praveen Aanur,10 Michelle Brown,10 Robert S. Meehan10 |
1George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; 2University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA; 3The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA; 4Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; 5Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA;
6Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota, FL, USA; 7Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA; 8Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA; 9Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 10Moderna Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
Background
• | Patients with human papillomavirus negative |
(HPV-) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma | |
(HNSCC) have poor prognosis with a 5-year | |
survival rate <50%1; limited durable clinical | |
responses to PD1/PD-L1 blockade may be due | |
to diminished effector cytolytic activity and | |
• | clonal diversity2-5 |
mRNA-4157 (V940) is a novel mRNA-based | |
individualized neoantigen therapy that encodes up | |
to 34 neoantigens inducing specifi c antitumor T cell | |
activation; durable clinical responses with | |
• | pembrolizumab have been shown in melanoma6 |
mRNA-4157-P101/KEYNOTE-603 (NCT03313778) |
Results
-
Of 28 enrolled patients, 22 received mRNA-4157
+ pembrolizumab (Table 1); six discontinued prior to receiving mRNA-4157 due to death or disease progression/deterioration and were not included in this analysis. All patients are off treatment as of the clinical cutoff date (May 4, 2023)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics
mRNA-4157 + | |
Baseline characteristics | pembrolizumab |
N = 22 | |
Sex, n (%) | |
Male | 14 (63.6) |
Safety
- Most mRNA-4157-related TEAEs were grade 1-2; the most common being infl uenza-like illness, injection-site pain, and pyrexia (Table 2)
- The safety profi le was consistent with mRNA-4157 monotherapy and the well-characterized safety profi le of pembrolizumab, with AEs being managed with established management guidelines
Clinical Response
- The objective response rate was 27.3% (6/22, 95% CI 10.7-50.2) and disease control rate was 63.6% (14/22, 95% CI 40.7-82.8), with best overall responses of 2 (9.1%) complete and 4 (18.2%) partial responses, and 8 (36.4%) stable disease at data cutoff (Figure 2)
Biomarkers
- Sustained de novo T cell induction to targeted neoantigens was seen in 5/5 available patient samples (Figure 3); IFN-γ responses were higher post mRNA- 4157 + pembrolizumab compared with baseline
- Decrease in ctDNA levels post-baseline were observed in 3/4 patients with disease control and in 0/3 patients with progressive disease (Figure 4)
Figure 3. Neoantigen-reactive T cell response to neoantigen peptide pools
1250 |
- Differential gene expression from pre-treatment tumor samples suggests increased baseline infl amed T cell- associated gene expression in patients with disease control (Figure 5A)
- Hallmark IL-2/STAT5 signaling and hallmark
infl ammatory response at baseline were found to be signifi cantly enriched in patients with disease control by de novo Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (Benjamini- Hochberg-adjusted descriptive P< 0.05; Figure 5B)
Figure 5. (A) Heatmap of transcript expression by disease control status and (B) gene set enrichment analyses from baseline tumor samples
Conclusions
• | mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab was associated with |
preliminary positive clinical responses and disease | |
control in patients with HPV- HNSCC, including two | |
• | complete responses |
mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab was well tolerated, | |
with an mRNA-4157 safety profi le consistent with | |
• | mRNA-4157 monotherapy |
mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab showed evidence of | |
activation of immune responses | |
• Patients within the disease control subgroup | |
demonstrated baseline infl amed T cell gene | |
expression with decreased ctDNA levels post | |
baseline |
is an ongoing phase 1 study evaluating mRNA-4157 |
alone or in combination with pembrolizumab in |
solid tumors |
Objective
-
To assess safety, tolerability, preliminary clinical activity, and translational biomarkers for mRNA-4157
+ pembrolizumab in patients with HPV- HNSCC (Part C)
Methods
• | Part C of this study enrolled patients 18 years old |
with checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-naive, recurrent/ | |
• | metastatic HPV- HNSCC |
Eligible patients received 200 mg pembrolizumab | |
Q3W IV during a 6-weeklead-in (during mRNA- | |
4157 manufacture), then combined with 1 mg | |
mRNA-4157 for up to 9 doses Q3W IM, followed | |
by pembrolizumab, until disease progression, | |
unacceptable toxicity, or 35 total cycles of | |
• | pembrolizumab (Figure 1) |
Safety, tolerability, and preliminary clinical response | |
were assessed per RECIST v1.1 criteria |
Female | 8 (36.4) |
Age, median (range), years | 62.5 (29-81) |
65 years, n (%) | 9 (40.9) |
ECOG PS score, n (%) | |
0 | 9 (40.9) |
1 | 13 (59.1) |
Prior immuno-oncology therapy, n | 0 |
Number of prior systemic therapies, n (%) | |
0 | 3 (13.6) |
1 | 15 (68.2) |
2 | 4 (18.2) |
PD-L1, n | |
Not evaluable | 7 |
CPS 1 | 15 |
CPS, combined positive score; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1.
- After the clinical cutoff date, the median (range) follow-up was 38.4 (11.7-194.9) weeks
- 8 (36.4%) patients completed 9 doses of mRNA-
4157 (median 5.5 doses, range 1-9). Median (range) treatment duration of mRNA-4157 was 13.8 (0.1-26.1) weeks, and 20.1 (6.1-68.0) weeks for pembrolizumab. Most patients (n = 19/22, 86.4%) received 2 cycles of lead-in pembrolizumab (range, 2-4 cycles)
Figure 2. Percent change of target lesion from baseline over time
(%) | ||||||||||||||||
from baseline | 300 | |||||||||||||||
200 | ||||||||||||||||
diameter | ||||||||||||||||
100 | ||||||||||||||||
target lesion | ||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in | ||||||||||||||||
-100 | ||||||||||||||||
0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 | 36 | 42 | 48 | 54 | 60 | 66 | 72 | 78 | 84 | 90 120 150 |
Time on study (weeks)
Tumor type = HPV- HNSCC | CR | PR | SD | PD | First new lesion |
The vertical reference line marks the scheduled start of mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab dosing Q3W that followed the pembrolizumab Q3W lead-in dose. The horizontal reference lines are plotted at y = 20 for PD (20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions) and y = -30 for PR (30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions).
CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
- Kaplan-Meierestimated median (95% CI) progression- free survival and overall survival were 15.0 (11.6-38.6) weeks and 107.1 (42.7-NE) weeks, respectively
(SFU/1x10cells)6 | 1000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
pools | ||||||||||||||||||||||
neoantigen | 500 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | 250 | |||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-treatment | Post-pembrolizumab, | Post-pembrolizumab, | ||||||||||||||||||||
pre-mRNA-4157 | post-mRNA-4157 |
Patient | Patient 1 (DC) | Patient 2 (NDC) | Patient 3 (DC) | Patient 4 (DC) | Patient 5 (DC) | |||||
Immunogenicity was evaluable in 5/22 (22.7%) patients with all 3 timepoints; 7 patients had insuffi cient sample quantity or quality. Data are plotted as sum of responses to mRNA-4157- specifi c neoantigen peptide pools (mix of individualized neoantigen peptides) at indicated timepoints during treatment. Patients with CR, PR, or SD were classifi ed as 'disease control' and patients with PD were classifi ed as 'no disease control'.
DC, disease control; NDC, no disease control; SFU, spot forming unit.
Figure 4. ctDNA dynamics
Disease control
A
Status |
TMB |
ALDH1A1 |
SOX2 |
SOX21 |
EZH2 |
ZNF812 |
KRT13 |
KRT4 |
MUC4 |
ADH7 |
CEACAM5 |
S100A1 |
GRAP2 |
CD28 |
PTPN7 |
CD27 |
CXCR6 |
SH2D1A |
ITK |
CD48 |
SELL |
TNFSF8 |
SELP |
CCL5 |
CMKLR1 |
TBX21 |
PRF1 |
GZMB |
HLA−E |
TIGIT |
EOMES |
FASLG |
CD8A |
NKG7 |
CXCL9 |
IDO1 |
PSMB10 |
LAG3 |
CD8B |
HLA−DQA1 |
KLRC2 |
KLRD1 |
KLRC4 |
CD274 |
PDCD1LG2 |
STAT1 |
ROS1 |
TGFBI |
COL27A1 |
CD276 |
SOX9 |
AGRN |
RAET1G |
RAET1E |
RAET1L |
ULBP3 |
ULBP2 |
TGFA |
LAMA3 |
EGFR |
B |
HALLMARK_ALLOGRAFT_REJECTION |
HALLMARK_ADIPOGENESIS |
HALLMARK_OXIDATIVE_PHOSPHORYLATION |
HALLMARK_MYOGENESIS |
HALLMARK_IL2_STAT5_SIGNALING |
HALLMARK_P53_PATHWAY |
HALLMARK_INFLAMMATORY_RESPONSE |
Status
Disease control
No disease control
TMB
400
400
200
0
RNA expression 3 2 1 0 -1-2-3
Hallmark pathways NES from GSEA
• | Randomized assessment of the mRNA-4157 + |
pembrolizumab treatment effect in the advanced | |
disease setting may be warranted |
References
- Schiff BA. 2022. Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. https://www.msdmanuals.com/ en-gb/professional/ear,-nose,-and-throat-disorders/tumors-of-the-head-and-neck/oropharyngeal-squamous-cell-carcinoma. Accessed March 7, 2024.
- Lechner A, et al. Oncotarget 2017;8:44418-44433.
- Wang J, et al. Sci Rep 2019;9:13404.
- Tosi A, et al. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2022;41:279.
- Xu K, et al Br J Cancer 2020;123:932-941.
- Weber JS, et al. Lancet 2024;403:632-644.
Acknowledgments
The study (NCT03313778) was sponsored by Moderna, Inc., in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Editorial assistance was provided by Caudex, a division of IPG Health Medical Communications, New York, NY, USA, funded by Moderna Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and under the direction of the authors. Thank you to patients and their families, site staff, vendors, collaborators, scientists, regulatory, operations, and manufacturing teams who discovered, improved, and enabled mRNA-4157 (V940).
Disclosures
JEB has received scientifi c consulting fees from Exelixis and Bluedot Bio, and has research grants from Celldex, CUE, and Moderna. RAJ has received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, BioAtla, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Merck; has received honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals; has received meeting or travel support from ASCO and APPOS; and has held a leadership or fi duciary role for NCI. JLG has received consulting fees from Astellas, EMD Serono, and Merck; and has received honoraria from Astellas and Aveo Oncology. JMM has received consulting fees from
• | Longitudinal assessments of immunogenicity via |
IFN-γ ELISpot and ctDNA detection were performed | |
• | using collected peripheral blood |
Next-generation sequencing was performed on | |
baseline tumor biopsies |
Figure 1. mRNA-4157-P101/KEYNOTE 603 Part C study design for patients with
HPV- HNSCC
HNSCC
HPV-
CPI-naive
advanced/metastic,
unresectable
N = 28
200 mg pembrolizumab Q3W: up to 35 cycles
Ecacy
follow-up
1 mg mRNA-4157 Q3W: up to 9 cycles
n = 22
Baseline | EoT |
tumor | |
EoT, end of treatment.
Table 2. Summary of TEAEs in 2 patients
mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab | |||||
TEAEa | N = 22 | ||||
Any grade | Grade 3 | ||||
All TEAEs, n (%) | 22 | (100.0) | 14 | (63.6) | |
mRNA-4157-related TEAE | 15 (68.2) | 3b (13.6) | |||
Infl uenza-like illness | 9 | (40.9) | 0 | ||
Injection-site pain | 8 | (36.4) | 0 | ||
Pyrexia | 8 | (36.4) | 1 | (4.5) | |
Fatigue | 6 | (27.3) | 0 | ||
Vaccination-site pain | 6 | (27.3) | 0 | ||
Chills | 3 | (13.6) | 0 | ||
Nausea | 3 | (13.6) | 0 | ||
Headache | 2 (9.1) | 0 | |||
Injection-site erythema | 2 (9.1) | 0 | |||
Lipase increased | 2 (9.1) | 1 | (4.5) | ||
Lymphocyte count decreased | 2 (9.1) | 1 | (4.5) | ||
Pain in extremity | 2 (9.1) | 0 | |||
aDefi ned as any event not present before exposure to mRNA-4157 or pembrolizumab, or any present event that worsens in intensity or frequency after exposure to study drug; bGrade 3 AEs were related to both mRNA-4157 and pembrolizumab; there were no grade 4 or 5 AEs related to mRNA-4157.
TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
-2 | |||||
10 | -3 | ||||
log | |||||
ctDNA | -4 | ||||
-5 | |||||
-6 | |||||
0 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 |
No disease control
-2
10 | -3 |
log | |
ctDNA | -4 |
-5-6
0 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | |
Days from first dose of mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab | |||||
Cancer detected | Detected | Not detected |
There were 8 (36.4%) patients with evaluable samples; 14 patients had insufficient sample quantity or quality.
HALLMARK_REACTIVE_OXYGEN_SPECIES_PATHWAY | |
HALLMARK_PEROXISOME | |
HALLMARK_UV_RESPONSE_UP | |
HALLMARK_APOPTOSIS | |
HALLMARK_PANCREAS_BETA_CELLS | |
HALLMARK_XENOBIOTIC_METABOLISM | |
HALLMARK_FATTY_ACID_METABOLISM | |
HALLMARK_COMPLEMENT | |
HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY | |
HALLMARK_TNFA_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB | |
HALLMARK_BILE_ACID_METABOLISM | |
HALLMARK_KRAS_SIGNALING_DN | |
HALLMARK_KRAS_SIGNALING_UP | |
HALLMARK_HEME_METABOLISM | |
HALLMARK_INTERFERON_GAMMA_RESPONSE | |
HALLMARK_APICAL_SURFACE | |
HALLMARK_HYPOXIA | |
HALLMARK_DNA_REPAIR | |
HALLMARK_UV_RESPONSE_DN | |
HALLMARK_IL6_JAK_STAT3_SIGNALING | |
HALLMARK_PI3K_AKT_MTOR_SIGNALING | |
HALLMARK_SPERMATOGENESIS | |
Pathway | HALLMARK_COAGULATION |
HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_LATE | |
HALLMARK_APICAL_JUNCTION | |
HALLMARK_MTORC1_SIGNALING | |
HALLMARK_GLYCOLYSIS |
HALLMARK_ANGIOGENESIS
HALLMARK_UNFOLDED_PROTEIN_RESPONSE
HALLMARK_INTERFERON_ALPHA_RESPONSE
HALLMARK_HEDGEHOG_SIGNALING
HALLMARK_G2M_CHECKPOINT
HALLMARK_CHOLESTEROL_HOMEOSTASIS
HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS
HALLMARK_NOTCH_SIGNALING
HALLMARK_ANDROGEN_RESPONSE
HALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION
HALLMARK_PROTEIN_SECRETION
HALLMARK_MITOTIC_SPINDLE
HALLMARK_MYC_TARGETS_V1
HALLMARK_WNT_BETA_CATENIN_SIGNALING
HALLMARK_TGF_BETA_SIGNALING
HALLMARK_MYC_TARGETS_V2
-1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Normalized enrichment score | |||
Adjusted descriptive P< 0.05 | True | False |
- Box indicates upregulated genes associated with infl amed T cell expression. (B) Gene set enrichment analysis categorized as hallmark pathways; blue indicates statistical significance and red indicates no statistical signifi cance with multiplicity adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
TMB, tumor mutational burden.
Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Seagen; and has participated in data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Moderna. JMC has received grants from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CBMG, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Grid Therapeutics, Moderna, Pfi zer, and Spectrum; has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, Omega Pharma, Pfi zer, Sanofi , Spectrum, Turning Point Therapeutics, and Vivacitas; has participated in data safety monitoring or advisory boards for G1 Therapeutics and STCube; and has served on the board
of the Lung Cancer Initiative of North Carolina. MRP has received consulting fees from Accutar Biotech, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Nurix, Olema Pharmaceuticals, and Pfi zer; has received honoraria from Janssen; and has received research funding (to institution) from Acerta Pharma, Accutar Biotech, Adagene, ADC Therapeutics, Agenus, Allorion Therapeutics, Artios Pharma, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BioNTech, BioTheryX, Blueprint Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Compugen, Conjupro Biotherapeutics, Cullinan Oncology, Cyteir Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erasca, Genentech/Roche, Georgiamune, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, H3 Biomedicine, Hengrui Therapeutics, Hotspot Therapeutics, Hutchison Medipharma, Immune-Onc Therapeutics, Immunitas, Incyte, Janssen, Kineta, Klus Pharma,
Kura Oncology, Kymab, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, LSK Biopartners, Mabspace, Macrogenics, Merck, Millenium Pharma, Moderna, Novartis, Nurix, Olema, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Pfi zer, Pionyr, Prelude Therapeutics, PureTech, Ribon Therapeutics, Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals, Step Pharma, Syndax, Taiho Pharmaceutical, TeneoBio, Tesaro, Treadwell Therapeutics, Vividion Therapeutics, and Zymeworks. MG has received consulting fees from Cellularity, Guardant, and Merck; and has participated in data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Sanofi. JFG has received consulting fees from AI Proteins, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, ITeos Therapeutics, Jounce Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Lilly/Loxo, Mariana Therapeutics, Merck, Merus Pharmaceuticals, Mirati Therapeutics, Moderna, Novartis, Novocure, Nuvalent, Pfi zer, Sanofi , Silverback Therapeutics, and Takeda; has received honoraria from Merck, Novartis, Pfi zer, and Takeda; has received research funding (to institution) from Adaptimmune, Alexo Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Jounce Therapeutics, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, NextPoint Therapeutics, and Palleon Pharmaceuticals; has received research funding from Genentech, Novartis, and Takeda; has equity in AI
Proteins; and has an immediate family member who has equity in and is employed by Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. SS, ZZ, AR, PH, MM, IF, LS, PA, and RSM hold stock in and are employees of Moderna. VS holds stock in AbbVie and Moderna and is an employee of Moderna. MB holds stock in Bristol Myers Squibb, Moderna, and Novartis; and is an employee of Moderna.
Presented at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting; San Diego, CA, USA; April 5-10, 2024
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Moderna Inc. published this content on 08 April 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 08 April 2024 20:51:39 UTC.