Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
23.74 USD | +0.76% | +7.37% | -10.75% |
04-10 | Solar, Telecoms Stocks Pull Asian Equities Traded in the US as American Depositary Receipts Lower on Wednesday | MT |
04-01 | Daqo New Energy's Profit Falls 70% as Revenue Tanks 47% | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- The group's high margin levels account for strong profits.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 3.9 and 6.37 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2024 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Renewable Energy Equipment & Services
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-10.75% | 1.56B | B- | ||
-18.69% | 19.47B | B+ | ||
+3.74% | 19.13B | B | ||
-15.29% | 15.23B | B- | ||
-13.38% | 13.47B | B | ||
-13.32% | 10.6B | - | ||
+37.48% | 7.64B | B | ||
-16.81% | 7.26B | C | ||
-30.07% | 6.63B | B | ||
+16.23% | 6.03B | B |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- DQ Stock
- Ratings Daqo New Energy Corp.