ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI ASA ATIONS
FORGENE
GENERATIONS
FORGENERATIO
Carbon Accounting Report 2023
2 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Carbon Accounting Report 2023
This report provides an overview of the organisation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emis- sions, which is an integrated part of the organisation's climate strategy. Carbon accounting is a fundamental tool in identifying tangible measures to reduce GHG emissions. The annual carbon accounting report enables the organisation to benchmark performance indicators and evaluate progress over time.
THIS REPORT COMPRISES THE FOLLOWING
ORGANISATIONAL UNITS:
The input data is based on consumption data from internal and external sources, which are converted into tonnes CO2-equivalents (tCO2e).The carbon footprint analysis is based on the international standard; A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, developed by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative (GHG Protocol). The GHG Protocol is the most widely used and recognised international standard for measuring greenhouse gas emissions and is the basis for the ISO standard 14064-I.
REPORTING YEAR ENERGY AND GHG EMISSIONS
Emission source | Description | Consumption | Unit | Energy (MWh) | Emissions (tCO2e) | % share |
Transportation total | 2,160.0 | 24.2 | 0.2 % | |||
Diesel (NO) | 10,641.0 | liters | 104.3 | 15.5 | - | |
Diesel (NO) | Farget diesel | 6,787.0 | liters | 66.5 | 35.8 | - |
Diesel (B7) | 14,401.0 | liters | 142.1 | 1.5 | - | |
Diesel (B7) | Blank diesel | 605.0 | liters | 6.0 | 4.4 | - |
Diesel (SE) | 2,400.0 | liters | 23.2 | 24.7 | - | |
Diesel | Owned cars | 9,281.0 | liters | 92.1 | 282.3 | 0.1 % |
Diesel | 106,150.9 | liters | 1,053.0 | 23.1 | - | |
Diesel | 23,086.0 | kgCO2e | 86.1 | 2.1 | - | |
Diesel | Pool cars | 807.9 | liters | 8.0 | 0.9 | - |
Petrol (E7) | 392.0 | liters | 3.5 | 95.3 | - | |
Petrol | 40,623.4 | liters | 374.5 | 10.3 | - | |
Petrol | 10,300.0 | kgCO2e | 40.5 | 3.4 | - | |
Petrol | 384.0 | gal(us) | 13.4 | 4.3 | - | |
Petrol | Pool cars | 1,834.0 | liters | 16.9 | 2.5 | - |
Bioethanol (E85) | 6,903.7 | liters | 44.3 | 17.6 | - | |
Petrol (E27) | 10,276.0 | liters | 85.5 | 17.6 |
CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 3 |
Emission source | Description | Consumption | Unit | Energy (MWh) | Emissions (tCO2e) | % share |
Stationary combustion total | 6,340.6 | 1,278.1 | 0.5 % | |||
Natural gas | 1,426,493.0 | kWh | 1,426.5 | 262.5 | ||
Natural gas | 355,210.6 | m3 | 3,569.9 | 729.5 | ||
Natural gas (NL) | 695.0 | m3 | 6.1 | 1.2 | ||
Natural gas (US) | 624,987.0 | kWh | 625.0 | 113.2 | ||
LPG | 457.0 | liters | 3.1 | 0.7 | ||
LPG | 352.0 | kg | 4.5 | 1.0 | ||
Burning oil | 43,207.0 | liters | 422.8 | 109.8 | ||
Natural gas (UK grid) | 181,138.0 | kWh | 181.1 | 33.1 | ||
Propane (NO) | 21.6 | kg | 0.3 | 0.1 | ||
Propane | 54.0 | kg | 0.7 | 0.2 | ||
Fuel/Diesel oil | 9,860.0 | liters | 100.6 | 26.7 | ||
Chemical-process total | - | 32.3 | - | |||
Aviform L50 | 5,000.0 | liters | - | 1.8 | - | |
Aviform S-solid | 3,000.0 | kg | - | 1.9 | - | |
Acetylene, combusted | 8,439.7 | kg | - | 28.5 | - | |
Liquid Oxygene (LOx) | 3,740.8 | m3 | - | - | - | |
Arcal Force | 1,006.3 | kg | - | 0.2 | - | |
Scope 1 total | 8,500.5 | 1,858.2 | 0.7% | |||
Electricity total | 10,045.8 | 2,280.5 | 0.9% | |||
Electricity Norway | 3,994,151.7 | kWh | 3,994.2 | 24.8 | - | |
Electricity Denmark 125 | 199,740.9 | kWh | 199.7 | 24.8 | - | |
Electricity Sweden | 374,760.0 | kWh | 374.8 | 4.3 | - | |
Electricity Switzerland | 7,936.0 | kWh | 7.9 | 0.2 | - | |
Electricity Japan | 5,437.0 | kWh | 5.4 | 2.5 | - | |
Electricity Germany | 880,019.5 | kWh | 880.0 | 307.1 | 0.1 % | |
Electricity Germany | Cars | 53,185.3 | kWh | 53.2 | 18.6 | - |
Electricity France | 615,462.0 | kWh | 615.5 | 32.1 | - | |
Electricity China | 1,272,650.0 | kWh | 1,272.7 | 779.9 | 0.3 % | |
Electricity Korea | 981.0 | kWh | 1.0 | 0.4 | - | |
Electricity UK | 737,430.0 | kWh | 737.4 | 152.1 | 0.1 % | |
Electricity USA | 492,593.0 | kWh | 492.6 | 181.9 | 0.1 % | |
Electricity Singapore | 11,111.2 | kWh | 11.1 | 4.3 | - | |
Electricity Poland | 97,115.4 | kWh | 97.1 | 63.2 | - | |
Electricity Israel | 30,916.0 | kWh | 30.9 | 13.7 | - | |
Electricity Netherlands | 14,043.6 | kWh | 14.0 | 4.4 | - | |
Electricity India | 733,120.0 | kWh | 733.1 | 525.4 | 0.2 % | |
Electricity Spain | 9,500.0 | kWh | 9.5 | 1.4 | - | |
Electricity Finland | 65,713.3 | kWh | 65.7 | 5.2 | - | |
Electricity Thailand | 39,306.0 | kWh | 39.3 | 18.5 | - | |
Electricity Malaysia | 19,564.0 | kWh | 19.6 | 12.1 | - | |
Electricity Romania | 366,096.0 | kWh | 366.1 | 99.7 | - | |
Electricity Brazil | 21,087.0 | kWh | 21.1 | 2.8 | - | |
Electricity Italy | 3,854.0 | kWh | 3.9 | 1.1 | - |
4 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI | CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 5 |
Emission source | Description | Consumption | Unit | Energy (MWh) | Emissions (tCO2e) | % share | Electricity Singapore (upstream) | 11,111.2 | kWh | 1.0 | |
Electricity general total | 8,242.9 | 4.9 | - | Electricity Poland (upstream) | 97,115.4 | kWh | 17.0 | ||||
Hydropower, Quebec | 8,242,881.0 | kWh | 8,242.9 | 4.9 | Electricity Israel (upstream) | 30,916.0 | kWh | 3.3 | |||
Electricity Netherlands (upstream) | 14,043.6 | kWh | 1.0 | ||||||||
Electric vehicles total | 0.4 | 0.3 | Petrol (E5) (WTT) | 392.0 | liters | 0.2 | |||||
Electric car Nordic | 393.4 | kWh | 0.4 | - | - | Electricity Nordic mix (WTT) | - | kWh | |||
Hybrid vehicles | 2,400.0 | km | - | 0.3 | - | Diesel (B5) (WTT) | 6,000.0 | liters | 3.7 | ||
Petrol (WTT) | 52,733.4 | liters | 32.0 | ||||||||
District heating location total | 240.5 | 18.0 | - | Petrol (WTT) | 2,664.5 | kgCO2e | 2.7 | ||||
District heating NO/Grimstad | 13,967.0 | kWh | 14.0 | 0.7 | - | Petrol (WTT) | 384.0 | gal(us) | 0.9 | ||
District heating Sweden mix | 5,700.0 | kWh | 5.7 | 0.3 | - | Heat & steam (upstream) | 65,023.5 | kWh | 2.3 | ||
District heating Finland mix | 33,620.6 | kWh | 33.6 | 3.7 | - | Electricity Nordic mix (upstream) | 393.4 | kWh | |||
District heating NO/Trondheim | 57,121.0 | kWh | 57.1 | 1.2 | - | Electricity Spain (upstream) | 9,500.0 | kWh | 0.5 | ||
District heating NO/Oslo | 99,221.0 | kWh | 99.2 | 0.9 | - | Electricity Switzerland (upstream) | 7,936.0 | kWh | 0.1 | ||
District heating NO/Stavanger/Sandnes | 21.5 | kWh | - | - | - | Electricity Japan (upstream) | 5,437.0 | kWh | 0.6 | ||
District cooling NO/Stavanger/Sandnes | 4.3 | kWh | - | - | - | LPG (WTT) | 457.0 | liters | 0.1 | ||
District heating Poland mix | 30,855.2 | kWh | 30.9 | 11.4 | - | LPG (WTT) | 352.0 | kg | 0.1 | ||
Electricity Malaysia (upstream) | 19,564.0 | kWh | 3.2 | ||||||||
Heat fuel specific total | - | - | Electricity Thailand (upstream) | 39,306.0 | kWh | 5.7 | |||||
District cooling, renewable | 547.7 | kWh | 0.5 | 14.7 | - | Propane/Butane (WTT) | 75.6 | kg | |||
Electricity Romania (upstream) | 366,096.0 | kWh | 29.7 | ||||||||
Heat fuel specific total | - | - | Electricity Italy (upstream) | 3,854.0 | kWh | 0.3 | |||||
Heat Natural gas | 79,764.8 | kWh | 79.8 | 14.7 | - | Electricity Brazil (upstream) | 21,087.0 | kWh | 1.3 | ||
Scope 2 total | 18,609.9 | 2,318.4 | 0.9 % | Fuel oil (WTT) | 9,860.0 | liters | 6.9 | ||||
E85 Bioethanol (WTT) | 6,903.7 | liters | 4.0 | ||||||||
Purchased goods and services total | - | kg | - | - | - | Burning oil (WTT) | 43,207.0 | liters | 22.9 | ||
Cheese, soft (A1-3) | - | kg | - | - | - | Electricity India (upstream) | 733,120.0 | kWh | 212.2 | 0.1 % | |
Fuel-and-energy-related activities total | - | kg | - | 1,302.9 | 0.5 % | Upstream transportation and distribution total | 246,757.0 | 96.8 % | |||
Diesel (B7) (WTT) | 26,432.0 | liters | 16.2 | Electricity Norway (upstream) | 81.9 | tkm | |||||
Electricity Norway (upstream) | 3,989,597.7 | kWh | 21.5 | Truck avg. | 36.1 | tCO2e | 36.1 | ||||
Electricity Sweden (upstream) | 314,376.0 | kWh | 4.4 | Truck avg. | 294,168.2 | tkm | 89.7 | ||||
District heating NO/SE (upstream) | 228,799.8 | kWh | 1.1 | Air freight avg. (WTT) | 67,451.4 | tCO2e | 67,451.4 | 26.5 % | |||
Electricity Germany (upstream) | 933,204.8 | kWh | 80.3 | Air freight avg. (WTT) | 3.2 | tCO2e | 3.2 | ||||
Electricity Denmark (upstream) | 199,740.9 | kWh | 9.7 | Rail freight | 16,112.6 | tkm | 0.1 | ||||
Diesel (SE) (WTT) | 2,400.0 | liters | 1.4 | Sea ship avg. (WTT) | 179,168.9 | tCO2e | 179,168.9 | 70.3 % | |||
Electricity Finland (upstream) | 65,713.3 | kWh | 2.3 | Sea ship avg. (WTT) | 7.6 | tCO2e | 7.6 | ||||
Natural gas (WTT) | 2,256,158.8 | kWh | 75.5 | Transportation | 2,256,158.8 | kWh | 75.5 | ||||
Natural gas (WTT) | 360,017.6 | m3 | 121.2 | ||||||||
Electricity Canada (upstream) | 8,242,881.0 | kWh | 269.5 | 0.1 % | |||||||
Electricity France (upstream) | 615,462.0 | kWh | 14.6 | ||||||||
Electricity China (upstream) | 1,272,650.0 | kWh | 165.4 | 0.1 % | |||||||
Electricity Korea (upstream) | 981.0 | kWh | 0.1 | ||||||||
Diesel (WTT) | 121,657.6 | liters | 75.9 | ||||||||
Electricity UK (upstream) | 733,318.0 | kWh | 44.3 | ||||||||
Electricity USA (upstream) | 492,593.0 | kWh | 47.6 |
6 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Emission source | Description | Consumption | Unit | Energy (MWh) Emissions (tCO2e) | % share |
Waste total | 291.6 | 0.1 % | |||
Residual waste, incinerated | 249.8 | m3 | 33.3 | ||
Residual waste, incinerated | 102,260.2 | kg | 56.3 | ||
Wood waste, recycled | 0.6 | tonne | |||
Wood waste, recycled | 132,523.2 | kg | 2.8 | ||
Glass waste, recycled | 3,814.3 | kg | 0.1 | ||
Paper waste, recycled | 7,116.6 | m3 | 23.1 | ||
Paper waste, recycled | 64,050.5 | kg | 1.4 | ||
Plastic waste, recycled | 117.0 | m3 | 0.2 | ||
Plastic waste, recycled | 24,483.6 | kg | 0.5 | ||
EE waste, recycled | 102.0 | m3 | 0.2 | ||
EE waste, recycled | 14,918.6 | kg | 0.3 | ||
Mixed waste, recycled | 17.0 | m3 | |||
Mixed waste, recycled | 73,554.0 | kg | 1.6 | ||
Hazardous waste, recycled | 76,706.8 | kg | 1.6 | ||
Hazardous waste, treated | 4,337.0 | kg | 0.1 | ||
Cardboard waste, recycled | 67,727.8 | kg | 1.4 | ||
Hazardous waste, incinerated (Europe) | 11,237.0 | kg | 27.0 | ||
Commercial waste, landfill | 8,700.0 | kg | 4.5 | ||
Food loss | 215.6 | kg | |||
Hazardous waste, landfill | 19,866.0 | kg | 0.4 | ||
Residual waste, landfill | 275.0 | m3 | 34.2 | ||
Residual waste, landfill | 53,638.4 | kg | 26.7 | ||
Metal waste, recycled | 13,401.0 | m3 | 37.0 | ||
Metal waste, recycled | 74,742.4 | kg | 1.6 | ||
Organic waste, treated | 252.0 | tonne | 5.4 | ||
Organic waste, treated | 16.0 | m3 | 0.2 | ||
Organic waste, treated | 29,979.0 | kg | 0.6 | ||
Plastic packaging waste, recycled | 21.0 | kg | |||
Mineral oil waste, incinerated | 600.0 | liters | 1.5 | ||
Waste water treatment | 2,891.0 | m3 | 0.6 | ||
Industrial waste, recycled | 1,682.4 | kg | |||
Organic waste, recycled | 6,426.1 | kg | 0.1 | ||
Organic waste, anaerobic digestion | 1,446.0 | kg | |||
Wood waste, reused | 14,821.0 | kg | 0.3 | ||
Organic waste, composting | 2,254.0 | kg | |||
Sorted waste, recycled | 7,200.0 | kg | 0.2 | ||
CCA impregnated wood waste (H), incinerated | 4,492.0 | kg | 0.1 | ||
Metal copper waste, recycled | 12,179.3 | kg | 0.3 | ||
Mineral wool waste, landfill | 1,752.0 | kg | |||
Metal aluminium waste, recycled | 3,064.2 | kg | 0.1 | ||
Plastic EPS waste, incinerated | 9,068.0 | kg | 21.5 | ||
Metal stainl steel waste, recycled | 9,972.0 | kg | 0.2 | ||
Plastic waste, incinerated | 2,450.0 | kg | 5.8 | ||
Fluorescent tubes waste (H), recycled | kg |
CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 7 |
Special waste, treated | 262.0 | kg | ||
Plasterboard waste, recycled | 3,240.0 | kg | 0.1 | |
Mineral oil waste, recycled | 180.0 | kg | ||
Paint warnish waste (H), incinerated | 140.0 | kg | 0.3 | |
Business travel total | 1,898.2 | 0.7 % | ||
Air travel, continental, incl. RF | 23,214.0 | pkm | 4.3 | |
Air travel, continental, incl. RF | 76.0 | flight trip | 15.7 | |
Air travel, continental, incl. RF | 15,514.0 | kgCO2e | 15.5 | |
Mileage all. avg. car | 122,551.2 | km | 20.4 | |
Mileage all. avg. car | 181,729.0 | mile | 48.7 | |
Air travel, domestic | 142,697.0 | pkm | 23.0 | |
Air travel, domestic | 1,420.0 | flight trip | 105.8 | |
Air travel, domestic | 4.8 | tCO2e | 4.8 | |
Air travel, domestic | 96,872.9 | kgCO2e | 96.9 | |
Air travel, domestic | 523,546.0 | pmile | 109.5 | |
Air travel, continental | 357,102.0 | pkm | 39.2 | |
Air travel, continental | 124.0 | flight trip | 15.1 | |
Air travel, continental | 31.5 | tCO2e | 31.5 | |
Air travel, continental | 122,825.8 | kgCO2e | 122.8 | |
Car, petrol (avg.) | 259,321.0 | km | 42.5 | |
Car, petrol (avg.) | 21,742.0 | liters | 51.0 | |
Air travel, intercontinental | 908,926.0 | pkm | 140.2 | 0.1 % |
Air travel, intercontinental | 25.0 | flight trip | 25.0 | |
Air travel, intercontinental | 8.5 | tCO2e | 8.5 | |
Air travel, intercontinental | 23,386.3 | kgCO2e | 23.4 | |
Mileage all. el car Nordic | 9,239.3 | km | ||
Mileage all. car (NO) | 3,162.0 | km | 0.2 | |
Mileage all. car (NO) | 4,464.8 | NOK | 0.1 | |
Taxi | 216,211.6 | km | 45.0 | |
Car, rental (fuel unknown) | 76,776.0 | km | 12.8 | |
Car, rental (fuel unknown) | 53.0 | kgCO2e | 0.1 | |
Electric car EU27 | 834.0 | km | ||
Air travel, domestic, incl. RF | 19,170.0 | pkm | 5.2 | |
Air travel, domestic, incl. RF | 44.0 | flight trip | 5.6 | |
Air travel, domestic, incl. RF | 11,638.6 | kgCO2e | 11.6 | |
Train International | 170,123.0 | pkm | 0.8 | |
Train International | 3,260.0 | kgCO2e | 3.3 | |
Hotel nights, world | 7,984.0 | nights | 316.3 | 0.1 % |
Car, diesel (avg.) | 204,532.4 | km | 34.7 | |
Car, diesel (avg.) | 41,173.0 | liters | 109.5 | |
Train, diesel | 812,165.0 | pkm | 73.9 | |
Hotel nights, Europe | 2,358.0 | nights | 32.1 | |
Car, Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) | 4,671.9 | km | 0.4 | |
Air travel, intercontinental, incl. RF | 37,864.0 | pkm | 9.9 | |
Air travel, intercontinental, incl. RF | 2.0 | flight trip | 3.4 |
8 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Air travel, intercontinental, incl. RF | 12,616.0 | kgCO2e | 12.6 | |
Train (FI) | 266.0 | pkm | ||
Flights | 103.1 | tCO2e | 103.1 | |
Flights | 134,683.7 | kgCO2e | 134.7 | 0.1 % |
Bus regional | 1,100.0 | pkm | ||
Hotel nights, Nordic | 386.0 | nights | 2.9 | |
Airport express train (NO) | 72.0 | trip | ||
Car travel | 45,001.0 | pkm | 7.4 | |
Train (UK) | 66.0 | pkm | ||
Mileage all. el car EU27 | 3,381.0 | km | 0.2 | |
Bus (NO) | 540.0 | pkm | ||
Air travel, continental, EC | 125,943.0 | pkm | 13.6 | |
Air travel, continental, BC | 36.0 | flight trip | 6.5 | |
Mileage all. car (DK) | 12,270.0 | km | 1.3 | |
Air travel, intercontinental, EC | 61,574.0 | pkm | 7.3 | |
Employee commuting total | 394.7 | 0.2 % | ||
Car, petrol (avg.) | 1,336,269.0 | km | 219.0 | 0.1 % |
Car, Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) | 62,643.0 | km | 5.9 | |
Car, diesel (avg.) | 583,491.0 | km | 99.1 | |
Train (UK) | 106,892.0 | pkm | 3.8 | |
Motorbike, small | 3,002.0 | km | 0.2 | |
Car, petrol (medium) | 291,310.0 | km | 51.9 | |
Car, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) | 25,615.0 | km | 3.0 | |
Electric car EU27 | 204,000.0 | km | 9.1 | |
Bus local avg. | 26,904.0 | pkm | 2.7 | |
Scope 3 total | 250,644.5 | 98.4 % | ||
Total | 27,110.4 | 254,821.1 | 100.0 % | |
KJ | 97,597,442,257.2 | 254,821.1 | 100.0 % |
CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 9 |
REPORTING YEAR MARKETBASED GHG EMISSIONS
Category | Unit | 2023 |
Transportation total | ||
Electricity Total (Scope 2) with Marketbased calculations | tCO2e | 4,304.3 |
Scope 2 Total with Marketbased electricity calculations | tCO2e | 4,342.2 |
Scope 1+2+3 Total with Marketbased electricity calculations | tCO2e | 256,844.9 |
ANNUAL GHG EMISSIONS
Category | Description | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | % change from last year |
Transportation total | 472.3 | 487.2 | 547.8 | ||
Diesel | 350.5 | 303.9 | 305.4 | 0.5 % | |
Diesel | Owned cars | 24.7 | 100.0 % | ||
Diesel | Pool cars | 2.1 | 100.0 % | ||
Diesel (B7) | 29.6 | 26.3 | 35.8 | 36.1 % | |
Diesel (B7) | Blank diesel | 2.1 | 1.5 | 28.6 % | |
Diesel (NO) | 25.4 | 24.2 | 4.7 % | ||
Diesel (NO) | Farget diesel | 13.7 | 15.5 | 13.1 % | |
Diesel (SE) | 4.4 | 100.0 % | |||
Bioethanol (E85) | 2.0 | 2.5 | 25.0 % | ||
Petrol (E7) | 0.9 | 100.0 % | |||
Petrol | 81.9 | 100.9 | 109.0 | 8.0 % | |
Petrol | Pool cars | 4.3 | 100.0 % | ||
Petrol (E27) | 3.2 | 12.8 | 17.6 | 37.5 % | |
Diesel (B5) | 7.1 | ||||
Autogas, LPG | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Stationary combustion total | 1,110.4 | 1,234.9 | 1,278.1 | 3.5 % | |
Natural gas | 814.8 | 939.1 | 992.0 | 5.6 % | |
Natural gas (NL) | 1.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Natural gas (US) | 123.7 | 138.3 | 113.2 | 18.1 % | |
Burning oil | 135.9 | 109.4 | 109.8 | 0.4 % | |
LPG | 8.6 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 52.8 % | |
Natural gas (UK grid) | 30.8 | 33.1 | 7.5 % | ||
Propane (NO) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 100.0 % | ||
Propane | 0.1 | 0.2 | 100.0 % | ||
Fuel/Diesel oil | 27.2 | 13.5 | 26.7 | 97.8 % | |
Chemical process total | 1.4 | 17.8 | 32.3 | 81.5 % | |
Acetylene, combusted | 1.4 | 13.0 | 28.5 | 119.2 % | |
Aviform L50 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 57.1 % | ||
Aviform Ssolid | 123.7 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 216.7 % | |
Arcal Force | 135.9 | 0.2 | 100.0 % | ||
Refrigerants total | 1.4 | 4.2 | 32.3 | 100.0 % | |
R410 A | 1.4 | 4.2 | 28.5 | 100.0 % | |
Scope 1 total | 1,584.2 | 1,744.1 | 1,858.2 | 6.5 % |
10 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI | CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 11 |
Category | Description | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | % change from last year | Heat fuel specific total | 49.9 | 14.7 | 70.5% | |
District heating CHP | 49.9 | 14.7 | 100.0% | |||||||
Electricity location based total | 2,760.2 | 2,442.0 | 2,280.8 | 6.6 % | ||||||
Electricity Norway | 38.0 | 26.8 | 24.8 | 7.5 % | Scope 2 total | 2,838.2 | 2,470.2 | 2,470.2 | 6.1 % | |
Electricity Denmark 125 | 1.6 | 22.8 | 24.8 | 8.8 % | ||||||
Electricity Sweden | 0.5 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 616.7 % | Purchased goods and services total | 0.7 | ||||
Electricity Switzerland | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Water supply, groundwater | 0.7 | |||||
Electricity Japan | 3.6 | 4.4 | 2.5 | 43.2 % | ||||||
Electricity Germany | 268.8 | 211.5 | 307.1 | 45.2 % | Fuel and energy related activities total | 1,562.9 | 1,398.1 | 1,302.9 | 6.8 % | |
Electricity Germany | Cars | 3.3 | 18.6 | 463.6 % | Electricity Norway (upstream) | 13.7 | 7.6 | 21.5 | 182.9 % | |
Electricity France | 43.2 | 35.6 | 32.1 | 9.8 % | Diesel (WTT) | 88.8 | 87.1 | 75.9 | 12.9 % | |
Electricity China | 1,266.0 | 1,129.0 | 779.9 | 30.9 % | Diesel (B7) (WTT) | 5.3 | 16.2 | 205.7 % | ||
Electricity Korea | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 20.0 % | Electricity Sweden (upstream) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 4.4 | 2,100.0 % | |
Electricity UK | 24.5 | 142.0 | 152.1 | 7.1 % | District heating NO/SE (upstream) | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 45.0 % | |
Electricity USA | 187.4 | 147.4 | 181.9 | 23.4 % | Electricity Germany (upstream) | 50.0 | 61.7 | 80.3 | 30.1 % | |
Electricity Singapore | 4.3 | 100.0 % | Electricity Denmark (upstream) | 0.8 | 4.0 | 9.7 | 142.5 % | |||
Electricity Poland | 59.1 | 7.0 | 63.2 | 802.9 % | Diesel (SE) (WTT) | 1.4 | 100.0 % | |||
Electricity Israel | 13.7 | 100.0 % | Electricity Finland (upstream) | 0.9 | 2.3 | 155.6 % | ||||
Electricity Netherlands | 4.4 | 100.0 % | Natural gas (WTT) | 167.8 | 166.6 | 196.7 | 18.1 % | |||
Electricity India | 735.7 | 599.7 | 525.4 | 12.4 % | Electricity Canada (upstream) | 284.2 | 277.2 | 269.5 | 2.8 % | |
Electricity Thailand | 14.0 | 16.9 | 18.5 | 9.5 % | Electricity France (upstream) | 9.0 | 11.1 | 14.6 | 31.5 % | |
Electricity Spain | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 600.0 % | Electricity China (upstream) | 409.5 | 330.0 | 165.4 | 49.9 % | |
Electricity Finland | 3.4 | 5.2 | 52.9 % | Electricity Korea (upstream) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
Electricity Malaysia | 14.6 | 10.4 | 12.1 | 16.3 % | Electricity UK (upstream) | 9.0 | 45.9 | 44.3 | 3.5 % | |
Electricity Romania | 98.3 | 75.9 | 99.7 | 31.4 % | Electricity USA (upstream) | 48.2 | 42.7 | 47.6 | 11.5 % | |
Electricity Brazil | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 47.4 % | Electricity Singapore (upstream) | 1.0 | 100.0 % | |||
Electricity Italy | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 38.9 % | Electricity Poland (upstream) | 19.2 | 2.1 | 17.0 | 709.5 % | |
Electric car Nordic | 0.1 | 100.0 % | Electricity Israel (upstream) | 3.3 | 100.0 % | |||||
Hybrid vehicles | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 25.0 % | Electricity Netherlands (upstream) | 1.0 | 100.0 % | |||
Diesel (B5) (WTT) | 1.7 | 15.7 | 3.7 | 76.4 % | ||||||
Electricity general total | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.3 % | Petrol (E5) (WTT) | 0.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Hydropower, Quebec | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.3 % | Electricity Nordic mix (WTT) | |||||
Petrol (WTT) | 22.0 | 40.4 | 35.5 | 12.1 % | ||||||
District heating location total | 10.1 | 23.5 | 18.0 | 23.4 % | Heat & steam (upstream) | 2.6 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 130.0 % | |
District heating NO/Grimstad | 0.2 | 0.7 | 250.0 % | Electricity Nordic mix (upstream) | ||||||
District heating SE/Jonkoping | 2.2 | 1.8 | 100.0 % | Electricity Spain (upstream) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 400.0 % | ||
District heating NO/Oslo | 1.1 | 0.9 | 100.0 % | Electricity Switzerland (upstream) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
District heating Sweden mix | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 50.0 % | Electricity Japan (upstream) | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 53.8 % | |
District heating Finland mix | 3.7 | 100.0 % | LPG (WTT) | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 50.0 % | |||
District heating DE/Karlsruhe | 1.1 | 100.0 % | Electricity India (upstream) | 339.9 | 230.0 | 212.2 | 7.7 % | |||
District heating SE/Stockholm | 0.5 | Electricity Malaysia (upstream) | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | |||||
District heating NO/Trondheim | 5.9 | 11.5 | 1.2 | 89.6 % | Electricity Thailand (upstream) | 4.5 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 11.8 % | |
District heating Poland mix | 8.4 | 11.4 | 35.7 % | Propane/Butane (WTT) | ||||||
Electricity Romania (upstream) | 45.6 | 26.2 | 29.7 | 13.4 % | ||||||
District heating general total | 13.9 | Electricity Italy (upstream) | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 40.0 % | ||||
District heating CHP | 13.9 | Electricity Brazil (upstream) | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 62.5 % | ||||
Burning oil (WTT) | 28.3 | 22.8 | 22.9 | 0.4 % | ||||||
Fuel oil (WTT) | 7.0 | 3.5 | 6.9 | 97.1 % | ||||||
E85 Bioethanol (WTT) | 2.5 | 4.0 | 60.0 % |
12 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
Category | Description | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | % change from last year |
Upstream transportation and distribution total | 246,757.0 | 100.0 % | |||
Electricity Norway (upstream) | 100.0 % | ||||
Truck avg. | 36.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Air freight avg. (WTT) | 67,541.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Rail freight | 3.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Sea ship avg. (WTT) | 179,169.0 | 100.0 % | |||
Transportation | 7.6 | 45.2 % | |||
Waste total | 79.1 | 149.3 | 291.6 | 95.3 % | |
Residual waste, incinerated | 35.0 | 50.5 | 89.7 | 77.6 % | |
Wood waste, recycled | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 180.0 % | |
Glass waste, recycled | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Paper waste, recycled | 0.6 | 0.9 | 24.4 | 2,611.1 % | |
Plastic waste, recycled | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 12.5 % | |
EE waste, recycled | 0.3 | 0.6 | 100.0 % | ||
Mixed waste, recycled | 6.2 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 166.7 % | |
Hazardous waste, recycled | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 220.0 % | |
Hazardous waste, reused | |||||
Hazardous waste, treated | 1.0 | 0.1 | 90.0 % | ||
Cardboard waste, recycled | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 27.3 % | |
Residual waste, landfill | 19.3 | 46.0 | 60.8 | 32.2 % | |
Hazardous waste, incinerated (Europe) | 4.1 | 9.2 | 27.0 | 193.5 % | |
Commercial waste, landfill | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.3 % | ||
Hazardous waste, landfill | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 100.0 % | |
Metal waste, recycled | 1.4 | 4.1 | 38.6 | 841.5 % | |
Organic waste, treated | 0.2 | 0.7 | 6.2 | 785.7 % | |
Waste water treatment | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 45.5 % | |
Plastic packaging waste, recycled | |||||
Mineral oil waste, incinerated | 12.5 | 1.5 | 88.0 % | ||
Industrial waste, recycled | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Organic waste, recycled | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Wood waste, reused | 0.3 | 100.0 % | |||
Sorted waste, recycled | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||
CCA impregnated wood waste (H), incinerated | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Metal copper waste, recycled | 0.2 | 0.3 | 50.0 % | ||
Metal aluminium waste, recycled | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Plastic EPS waste, incinerated | 21.5 | 100.0 % | |||
Metal stainl steel waste, recycled | 0.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Plastic waste, incinerated | 7.2 | 0.8 | 5.8 | 625.0 % | |
Wood waste, incinerated | 0.1 | 0.3 | 100.0 % | ||
Plasterboard waste, recycled | 0.1 | 100.0 % | |||
Hazardous waste, incinerated (GLO) | 12.8 | 100.0 % | |||
Paint warnish waste (H), incinerated | 0.3 | 100.0 % |
CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 13 |
Category | Description | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | % change from last year |
Business travel total | 543.2 | 1,457.3 | 1,898.2 | 30.3 % | |
Hand sanitizer | |||||
Air travel, continental, incl. RF | 38.0 | 308.9 | 35.5 | 88.5 % | |
Mileage all. avg. car | 60.7 | 80.1 | 69.1 | 13.7 % | |
Air travel, domestic | 75.0 | 132.8 | 340.0 | 156.0 % | |
Air travel, domestic, incl. RF | 48.0 | 120.3 | 22.4 | 81.4 % | |
Air travel, continental | 6.6 | 46.6 | 208.6 | 347.6 % | |
Car, petrol (avg.) | 28.6 | 93.5 | 226.9 % | ||
Air travel, intercontinental | 27.0 | 68.6 | 197.0 | 187.2 % | |
Flights | 58.5 | 231.3 | 237.8 | 2.8 % | |
Hotel nights, Europe | 32.1 | 26.6 | 32.1 | 20.7 % | |
Air travel, intercontinental, BC, incl. RF | 27.8 | 100.0 % | |||
Air travel, intercontinental, incl. RF | 73.7 | 25.9 | 64.9 % | ||
Mileage all. car (NO) | 2.4 | 0.3 | 87.5 % | ||
Taxi | 3.6 | 26.8 | 45.0 | 67.9 % | |
Car, rental (fuel unknown) | 0.1 | 5.0 | 12.8 | 156.0 % | |
Train International | 0.6 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 700.0 % | |
Hotel nights, world | 146.0 | 220.8 | 316.3 | 43.3 % | |
Car, diesel (avg.) | 144.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Train, diesel | 31.8 | 32.5 | 73.9 | 127.4 % | |
Car, Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) | 0.4 | 100.0 % | |||
Air travel, continental, EC | 3.6 | 11.6 | 13.6 | 17.2 % | |
Bus (NO) | |||||
Hotel nights, Nordic | 2.4 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 107.1 % | |
Car (avg.) DEFRA | 8.5 | ||||
Car travel | 3.2 | 7.4 | 131.3 % | ||
Mileage all. el car EU27 | 0.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Mileage all. car (DK) | 0.9 | 1.3 | 100.0 % | ||
Air travel, intercontinental, EC | 4.8 | 7.3 | 52.1 % | ||
Air travel, continental, BC | 3.0 | 6.5 | 116.7 % | ||
Employee commuting total | 298.5 | 394.7 | 32.2 % | ||
Car, petrol (avg.) | 184.9 | 219.0 | 18.4 % | ||
Car, Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) | 0.1 | 5.9 | 5,800.0 % | ||
Car, diesel (avg.) | 47.9 | 99.1 | 106.9 % | ||
Train (UK) | 3.8 | 100.0 % | |||
Motorbike, small | 0.2 | 100.0 % | |||
Car, petrol (medium) | 56.2 | 51.9 | 7.7 % | ||
Car, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) | 3.0 | 100.0 % | |||
Electric car EU27 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 40.0 % | ||
Bus local avg. | 2.8 | 2.7 | 3.6 % | ||
Scope 3 total | 2,186.0 | 3,303.2 | 250,644.5 | 7,487.9 % | |
Total | 6,608.3 | 7,517.4 | 254,821.1 | 3,289.8 % | |
Percentage change | 100.0 % | 13.8 % | 3,289.8 % | 6.1 % |
14 | ARENDALS FOSSEKOMPANI |
CARBON ACCOUNTING REPORT 2023 | 15 |
ANNUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION (MWH) SCOPE 1 & 2
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ||
20k | ||||||
17,949.4 | 18,609.9 | |||||
17,245.7 | ||||||
15k | ||||||
10k | ||||||
7,685.7 | 8,583.4 | 8,500.5 | ||||
5k | ||||||
0k | ||||||
Scope 1 (MWh) | Scope 2 (MWh) | |||||
Category | Unit | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Electricity Total (Scope 2) with Market based calculations | tCO2e | 4,231.2 | 4,139.5 | 4,304.3 |
Scope 2 Total with Marketbased electricity calculations | tCO2e | 4,309.5 | 4,168.2 | 4,342.2 |
Scope 1+2+3 Total with Marketbased electricity calculations | tCO2e | 8,079.6 | 9,215.5 | 256,844.9 |
Percentage change | 100.0 % | 14.1 % | 2,687.1 % |
Emission factors per fuel type are based on assumptions in the IEA methodological framework. Factors for district heating/cooling are either based on actual (local) production mixes, or average IEA statistics.
In January 2015, the GHG Protocol published new guidelines for calculating emissions from electricity consump- tion. Primarily two methods are used to "allocate"the GHG emissions created by electricity generation to the end consumers of a given grid. These are the location-based and the market-based methods. The location-based method reflects the average emission intensity of the grids on which energy consumption occurs, while the market-based method reflects emissions from electricity that companies have purposefully chosen (or not chosen).
Organisations who report on their GHG emissions will now have to disclose both the location-based emissions from the production of electricity, and the marked-based emissions related to the potential purchase of Guarantees of Origin (GoOs) and Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs).
The purpose of this amendment in the reporting methodology is on the one hand to show the impact of energy efficiency measures, and on the other hand to display how the acquisition of GoOs or RECs affect the GHG emissions. Using both methods in the emission reporting highlights the effect of all measures regarding electricity consumption.
The location-based method: The location-based method is based on statistical emissions information and electricity output aggregated and averaged within a defined geographic boundary and during a defined time period. Within this boundary, the different energy producers utilize a mix of energy resources, where the use of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas) result in direct GHG-emissions.
fuels. Scope 3 includes indirect emissions resulting from value chain activities. The scope 3 emissions are a result of the company's upstream and downstream activities, which are not controlled by the company, i.e. they are indi- rect. Examples are business travel, goods transportation, waste handling, consumption of products etc. In general, the carbon accounting should include information that users, both internal and external to the company, need for their decision making. An important aspect of relevance is the selection of an appropriate inventory boundary which reflects the substance and economic reality of the company's business relationships.
Most emission factors used for calculating waste generated in own operations are published by EcoInvent 3.9 (2023), while business travel and fuel-and-energy-related activities are derived from DEFRA (DEFRA, 2023) and IEA (2023).
Following the GHG Protocol, emissions are calculated using the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP) from the IPCC Assessment Reports recommended in emission factor sources.
SOURCES
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Stra tegy (2022). Government emission conversion factors for greenhouse gas company reporting (DEFRA) IEA (2022). Emission Factors database, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris. IMO (2020). Reduction of GHG emissions from ships - Third IMO GHG Study 2014 (Final report). International Maritime Organisation, iadc. org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/MEPC-67-6-INF3- 2014-Final- Report-complete.pdfIPCC (2014). IPCC fifth assessment report: Climate change 2013 (AR5 updated version November 2014). ipcc.ch/report/ar5/ AIB, RE-DISS
METHODOLOGY AND SOURCES
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol initiative (GHG Protocol) was developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). This analysis is done according to A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard Revised edition, currently one of four GHG Protocol accounting standards on calculating and reporting GHG emissions. The reporting considers the following greenhouse gases, all converted into CO2-equivalents: CO2, CH4 (methane), N2O (laugh- ing gas), SF6, HFCs, PFCs and NF3.
For corporate reporting, two distinct approaches can be used to consolidate GHG emissions: The equity share approach and the control approach. The most common consolidation approach is the control approach, which can be defined in either financial or operational terms.
The carbon inventory is divided into three main scopes of direct and indirect emissions.
Scope 1 includes all direct emission sources.This includes all use of fossil fuels for stationary combustion or trans- portation, in owned and, depending on the consolidation approach selected, leased, or rented assets. It also includes any process emissions, from e.g. chemical pro- cesses, industrial gases, direct methane emissions etc.
Average emission factors for fossil fuel, stationary combustion and refrigerants are based on The Department For Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, DEFRA (DEFRA, 2023). Country-specific emission factors are based on Drivmedel 2023 (Energimyndigheten, 2023), Norwegian Environmental Agency 2023 and EPA 2023.
Scope 2 includes indirect emissions related to purchased energy; electricity and heating/cooling where the organisation has operational control. The electricity emission factors used in Cemasys are based on national gross electricity production mixes from the International Energy Agency's statistics (IEA Stat).
These emissions are reflected in the location-based emission factor.
The market-based method: The choice of emission factors when using this method is determined by whether the business acquires GoOs/RECs or not. When selling GoOs or RECs, the supplier certifies that the electricity is produced exclusively by renewable sources, which has an emission factor of 0 grams CO2e per kWh. However, for electricity without the GoO or REC, the emission factor is based on the remaining electricity production after all GoOs and RECs for renewable energy are sold. This is called a residual mix, which is normally substantially higher than the location-based factor. As an example, the market-based Norwegian residual mix factor is approximately 7 times higher than the location-based Nordic mix factor.
The reason for this high factor is due to Norway's large export of GoOs/RECs to foreign consumers. In a "market perspective, this implies that Norwegian hydropower is largely substituted with an electricity mix including fossil
(2020). Reliable disclosure systems for Europe - Phase 2: European residual mixes.WBCSD/WRI (2004).The greenhouse gas protocol. A corporate accounting and reporting standard (revised edition). World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Geneva, Switzerland /World Resource Institute (WRI), Washington DC, USA, 116 pp. WBCSD/WRI (2011). Corporate value chain (Scope
- accounting and reporting standard: Supplement to the GHG Protocol corporate accounting and report- ing standard. World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Geneva, Switzerland /World Resource Institute (WRI), Washington DC, USA, 149 pp. WBCSD/WRI (2015). GHG protocol Scope 2 guidance: An amendment to the GHG protocol corportate standard. World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Geneva, Switzerland /World Resource Institute (WRI), Washington DC, USA, 117 pp. The reference list above is incomplete but contains the essential refer- ences used in CEMAsys. In addition, several local/national sources may be relevant, depending on which emission factors are used.
VISITING ADDRESS
Langbryggen 9
4841 Arendal
POSTAL ADDRESS
Box 280
4803 Arendal
+47 37 23 44 00 | |
firmapost@arendalsfoss.no | |
arendalsfossekompani.no | © Arendals Fossekompani ASA. All Rights Reserved. |
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Arendals Fossekompani ASA published this content on 12 April 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 12 April 2024 06:34:58 UTC.
