What should in-house counsel be on the lookout for in 2024? As we begin a new year, our attorneys look ahead at intellectual property topics they expect will be trending in 2024. They cover areas including life sciences, litigation, post-grant proceedings, artificial intelligence, design patents, and trademarks.
LIFE SCIENCES
In 2023's
"Generally, US Examination of claims in the biotech and pharmaceutical industry will likely see some heightened scrutiny for meeting the 35
In 2023's In re Cellect, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's cancellation of claims for obviousness-type double patenting over reference claims from earlier expiring patents in the same family in which differences in expiration dates were due solely to patent term adjustment.
"I would not at all be surprised if this goes up to the
One area that received a lot of attention in 2023 was the drug pricing scheme and the Inflation Reduction Act, which essentially incentivized the development of biologics over small molecules by allowing price controls to kick in after only nine years, compared to 13 years for biologics.
"On the patent side, one thing we'll be expecting to see is just how this plays out. There are a number of cases challenging the legislation, but we'll be seeing and interacting with the companies that we work with. We may shift priorities around the different assets that they protect, and will certainly look at their patent strategy to ensure that values and priorities remain aligned with the pipeline plans to the extent that they're going to be shifting in view of this legislation."
Another issue that grabbed headlines was the
"This is something to really pay attention to because that obligation carries forward to any partners of an entity that developed an invention under a federally funded project. They carry the obligation to manufacture products that will be sold in
LITIGATION
"Respondents that are named in ITC complaints in 2024 should take a hard look at whether you can file a request not to institute, or a request to narrow the complaint in some way. It is rare for the ITC to deny institution, but it's not unprecedented and the ITC did exactly that in this case, investigation 1380 – it even denied entirely as to one specific respondent. I think if you can find a strong argument or look for a hole in the complaint, there's always a chance that you're going to be successful."
The Unified Patent Court, UPC, and the European Unitary Patent came into full force on
"It will be interesting to see how these litigations start to run to completion in 2024. There are questions about how patent friendly the UPC will be. There are some assumptions that it will be patentee friendly, but we don't know. Decisions that will come down in 2024 will help us to tailor our review and advice for clients and for use of that system. Related to the UPC decisions is the patents that can be asserted in the Unified Patent Court. So there's regular jurisdictional patents, as well as the unitary patent, and it'll be interesting to see how the unitary patent continues to play out in the UPC."
POST-GRANT PROCEEDINGS
PTAB practitioners are eagerly awaiting an updated rules package. Following the release of an uncharacteristically large proposal in 2023, industry experts expect to see a smaller set of proposals and much more clarity.
"A lot of the proposals that I expect to be in any proposed rule package will be relatively modest and will be codifying practices, frankly, that are already ongoing, and which clients are already dealing with when it comes to whether a petition will be discretionarily denied based upon a parallel litigation. What are those considerations? The director issued a memo about a year or so back, which everybody has been following. So I don't expect anything to change radically. It's just a matter of getting those practices committed to rules."
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial intelligence touched just about every field in 2023, and that includes robotics.
"We basically tell our clients, 'file early, file often.' So if you have an idea that you think is a game-changer, it may be the future of your company, you should file earlier rather than later. That said, you do need to have an idea of 'What's the problem I'm addressing? How am I addressing it?' For instances where you're applying AI to a problem, you really have to drill down into the details, because you can't just say, 'I have AI, and I get a patent.' It does not happen that way."
One key issue concerns
"We are very interested in this because part of this approach focuses on the IP issues, including some patent and copyright issues. The order directs various actions to be taken by agencies, including the USPTO and the Copyright Office. So this order will definitely have impacts in 2024 on patent inventorship, patent eligibility, and with respect to copyrights, a scope of protection for works produced using AI and the treatment of copyrighted works in AI training."
DESIGN PATENTS
In 2023, the design patent community was impacted by the
"It's important to be more strategic about thinking, "What are the types of products that you actually care about from a commercial perspective?" If you're in a certain industry, do you really care about covering completely irrelevant industries that don't compete with you? The question and advice to inventors and companies is: think hard about what you are trying to cover with this design? What types of categories of products are most important? And then we can tailor a title accordingly. We're not going to be too narrow, we're not going to be too broad, but something just in the middle so that you get good protection, but you're also less vulnerable to a validity issue."
TRADEMARKS
In 2023, in the Jack Daniels case, the
"The First Amendment can come into play on whether there's a commentary and whether there is some kind of parody happening with regard to the name. But if it's being used as a mark, that just becomes part of the analysis of likelihood of confusion, and the First Amendment doesn't automatically protect the right to use that mark if it's going to lead to a likelihood of confusion in the marketplace. The Court's decision in Elster will be indicative of where this line between trademark and First Amendment is going."
On
"It's very straightforward. The justices were very skeptical about how this has any impact on free speech, because after all, even if [the Respondent] doesn't get a registration, he still can go ahead and sell his t-shirts anyway. The justices were also concerned with prohibiting an individual from controlling his or her own name. In other words, why should an individual not be able to stop someone from using his or her name on a commercial product?"
Episode 33:Wolf Greenfield Attorneys Preview What's Ahead in 2024
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
MA 02210
Tel: 617646 8000
Fax: 617646 8646
E-mail: www.wolfgreenfield.com
URL: www.wolfgreenfield.com
© Mondaq Ltd, 2024 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source