For release 10:00 a.m. (EST) Friday, January 3, 2020

USDL-20-0001

Technical information:

Employment:

(202) 691-6559

sminfo@bls.gov • www.bls.gov/sae

Unemployment:

(202) 691-6392

lausinfo@bls.gov • www.bls.gov/lau

Media contact:

(202) 691-5902

PressOffice@bls.gov

METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT - NOVEMBER 2019

Unemployment rates were lower in November than a year earlier in 223 of the 389 metropolitan areas, higher in 137 areas, and unchanged in 29 areas, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. A total of 153 areas had jobless rates of less than 3.0 percent and 2 areas had rates of at least 10.0 percent. Nonfarm payroll employment increased over the year in 51 metropolitan areas and was essentially unchanged in the remaining 338 areas. The national unemployment rate in November was 3.3 percent, not seasonally adjusted, little changed from a year earlier.

This news release presents statistics from two monthly programs. The civilian labor force and unemployment data are based on the same concepts and definitions as those used for the national household survey estimates. These data pertain to individuals by where they reside. The employment data are from an establishment survey that measures nonfarm employment, hours, and earnings by industry. These data pertain to jobs on payrolls defined by where the establishments are located. For more information about the concepts and statistical methodologies used by these two programs, see the Technical Note.

Metropolitan Area Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

In November, Logan, UT-ID, and Ames, IA, had the lowest unemployment rates, 1.5 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively. El Centro, CA, and Yuma, AZ, had the highest unemployment rates, 20.6 percent and 15.4 percent, respectively. A total of 215 areas had November jobless rates below the U.S. rate of

3.3 percent, 161 areas had rates above it, and 13 areas had rates equal to that of the nation. (See table 1 and map 1.)

Kokomo, IN, had the largest over-the-year unemployment rate decrease in November (-4.6 percentage points), followed by Rockford, IL (-4.3 points), and Panama City, FL (-4.2 points). Twenty-six other areas had rate declines of at least 1.0 percentage point. The largest over-the-year rate increase occurred in El Centro, CA (+2.1 percentage points).

Of the 51 metropolitan areas with a 2010 Census population of 1 million or more, Salt Lake City, UT, had the lowest unemployment rate in November, 1.9 percent. New Orleans-Metairie, LA, had the highest jobless rate among the large areas, 4.4 percent. Thirty-six large areas had over-the-year unemployment rate decreases, 13 had increases, and 2 had no change. The largest rate decreases

occurred in Cleveland-Elyria, OH (-1.1 percentage points), and Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO, and Seattle-Takoma-Bellevue, WA (-1.0 point each). The largest jobless rate increase was in Pittsburgh, PA (+0.8 percentage point).

Metropolitan Division Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

Eleven of the most populous metropolitan areas are made up of 38 metropolitan divisions, which are essentially separately identifiable employment centers. In November, Framingham, MA, and San Francisco-RedwoodCity-South San Francisco, CA, had the lowest unemployment rates among the divisions, 1.9 percent each. Tacoma-Lakewood, WA, and Philadelphia, PA, had the highest division rates, 5.1 percent and 5.0 percent, respectively. (See table 2.)

In November, 27 metropolitan divisions had over-the-year unemployment rate decreases, 8 had increases, and 3 had no change. The largest rate decline occurred in Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA (-1.4 percentage points). The largest over-the-year jobless rate increase occurred in Philadelphia, PA (+0.6 percentage point).

Metropolitan Area Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

In November, 51 metropolitan areas had over-the-year increases in nonfarm payroll employment and

338 were essentially unchanged. The largest over-the-year employment increases occurred in Dallas- Fort Worth-Arlington, TX (+120,700), New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA (+99,400), and Los Angeles-LongBeach-Anaheim, CA (+96,000). The largest over-the-year percentage gains in employment occurred in Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC (+5.1 percent), Idaho Falls, ID (+4.5 percent), and Ogden-Clearfield, UT (+4.2 percent). (See table 3 and map 2.)

Over the year, nonfarm employment rose in 36 of the 51 metropolitan areas with a 2010 Census population of 1 million or more, while employment was essentially unchanged in 15 areas. The largest over-the-year percentage increases in employment in these large metropolitan areas occurred in Raleigh, NC (+3.8 percent), Jacksonville, FL (+3.4 percent), and Dallas-FortWorth-Arlington, TX, and San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX (+3.2 percent each).

Metropolitan Division Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

In November, nonfarm payroll employment increased in 12 of the 38 metropolitan divisions over the year and was essentially unchanged in 26 divisions. The largest over-the-year increase in employment among the metropolitan divisions occurred in Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX (+97,800), followed by Los Angeles-LongBeach-Glendale, CA (+81,900), and New York-JerseyCity-White Plains, NY-NJ (+77,300). (See table 4.)

The largest over-the-year percentage increases in employment occurred in Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX (+3.7 percent), San Francisco-RedwoodCity-South San Francisco, CA (+3.1 percent), and Seattle- Bellevue-Everett, WA (+3.0 percent).

_____________

The State Employment and Unemployment news release for December 2019 is scheduled to be released on Friday, January 24, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (EST). The Metropolitan Area Employment

-2-

and Unemployment news release for December 2019 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 5, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (EST).

-3-

Technical Note

This news release presents civilian labor force and unemployment data from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program (tables 1 and 2) for 389 metropolitan statistical areas and metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs), plus 7 areas in Puerto Rico. Estimates for 38 metropolitan and NECTA divisions also are presented. Nonfarm payroll employment estimates from the Current Employment Statistics (CES) program (tables 3 and 4) are provided for the same areas. State estimates were previously published in the news release State Employment and Unemployment, and are republished in this news release for ease of reference. The LAUS and CES programs are both federal-state cooperative endeavors.

Civilian labor force and unemployment-from the LAUS program

Definitions. The civilian labor force and unemployment data are based on the same concepts and definitions as those used for the official national estimates obtained from the Current Population Survey (CPS), a sample survey of households that is conducted for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) by the U.S. Census Bureau. The LAUS program measures employed persons and unemployed persons on a place-of-residence basis. The universe for each is the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years of age and older. Employed persons are those who did any work at all for pay or profit in the reference week (typically the week including the 12th of the month) or worked 15 hours or more without pay in a family business or farm, plus those not working who had a job from which they were temporarily absent, whether or not paid, for such reasons as labor-management dispute, illness, or vacation. Unemployed persons are those who were not employed during the reference week (based on the definition above), had actively looked for a job sometime in the 4-week period ending with the reference week, and were currently available for work; persons on layoff expecting recall need not be looking for work to be counted as unemployed. The civilian labor force is the sum of employed and unemployed persons. The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed as a percent of the civilian labor force.

Method of estimation. Estimates for states, the District of Columbia, the Los Angeles-LongBeach-Glendale metropolitan division, and New York City are produced using time-series models with real-time benchmarking to national CPS totals. Model-based estimates are also produced for the following areas and their respective balances: the Chicago- Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metropolitan Division; Cleveland-Elyria, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area; Detroit- Warren-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area; Miami- Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan Division; and Seattle- Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan Division. Modeling improves the statistical basis of the estimation for these areas and provides important tools for analysis, such as measures of errors and seasonally adjusted series. For all other substate

areas in this news release, estimates are prepared through indirect estimation procedures using a building-block approach. Estimates of employed persons, which are based largely on "place of work" estimates from the CES program, are adjusted to refer to place of residence as used in the CPS. Unemployment estimates are aggregates of persons previously employed in industries covered by state unemployment insurance (UI) laws and entrants to the labor force from the CPS. The substate estimates of employment and unemployment, which geographically exhaust the entire state, are adjusted proportionally to ensure that they add to the independently estimated model-based area totals. A detailed description of the estimation procedures is available from BLS upon request.

Annual revisions. Civilian labor force and unemployment data shown for the prior year reflect adjustments made at the beginning of each year, usually implemented with the issuance of January estimates. The adjusted model-based estimates typically reflect updated population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, any revisions in other input data sources, and model re-estimation. All substate estimates then are re-estimated using updated inputs and adjusted to add to the revised model-based totals. In early 2015, a new generation of time-series models was implemented, resulting in the replacement of data back to the series beginnings. At the same time, enhancements were made to the substate estimation methodology, and more timely inputs from the American Community Survey were incorporated.

Employment-from the CES program

Definitions. Employment data refer to persons on establishment payrolls who receive pay for any part of the pay period that includes the 12th of the month. Persons are counted at their place of work rather than at their place of residence; those appearing on more than one payroll are counted on each payroll. Industries are classified on the basis of their principal activity in accordance with the 2017 version of the North American Industry Classification System.

Method of estimation. CES State and Area employment data are produced using several estimation procedures. Where possible these data are produced using a "weighted link relative" estimation technique in which a ratio of current-month weighted employment to that of the previous-month weighted employment is computed from a sample of establishments reporting for both months. The estimates of employment for the current month are then obtained by multiplying these ratios by the previous month's employment estimates. The weighted link relative technique is utilized for data series where the sample size meets certain statistical criteria.

For some employment series, the sample of establishments is very small or highly variable. In these cases,

a model-based approach is used in estimation. These models use the direct sample estimates (described above), combined with forecasts of historical (benchmarked) data to decrease volatility in estimation. Two different models (Fay-Herriot Model and Small Domain Model) are used depending on the industry level being estimated. For more detailed information about each model, refer to the BLS Handbook of Methods.

Annual revisions. Employment estimates are adjusted annually to a complete count of jobs, called benchmarks, derived principally from tax reports that are submitted by employers who are covered under state unemployment insurance (UI) laws. The benchmark information is used to adjust the monthly estimates between the new benchmark and the preceding one and also to establish the level of employment for the new benchmark month. Thus, the benchmarking process establishes the level of employment, and the sample is used to measure the month-to-month changes in the level for the subsequent months.

Seasonal adjustment. Payroll employment data are seasonally adjusted for states, metropolitan areas, and metropolitan divisions at the total nonfarm level. For states, data are seasonally adjusted at the supersector level as well. Revisions to historical data for the most recent 5 years are made once a year, coincident with annual benchmark adjustments.

Payroll employment data are seasonally adjusted concurrently, using all available estimates, including those for the current month, to develop sample-based seasonal factors. Concurrent sample-based factors are created every month for the current month's preliminary estimate as well as the previous month's final estimate in order to incorporate real-time estimates.

Civilian labor force and unemployment estimates. Measures of sampling error are not available for metropolitan areas or metropolitan divisions. Model-basederror measures for states are available on the BLS website at www.bls.gov/lau/lastderr.htm. Measures of nonsampling error are not available for the areas contained in this news release. Information on recent data revisions for states and local areas is available online at www.bls.gov/lau/launews1.htm.

Employment estimates. Changes in metropolitan area nonfarm payroll employment are cited in the analysis of this news release only if they have been determined to be statistically significant at the 90-percent confidence level. Measures of sampling error for the total nonfarm employment series are available for metropolitan areas and metropolitan divisions at www.bls.gov/web/laus/790stderr.htm. Measures of sampling error for more detailed series at the area and division level are available upon request. Measures of sampling error for states at the supersector level and for the private service- providing, goods-producing, total private and total nonfarm levels are available on the BLS website at www.bls.gov/web/laus/790stderr.htm. Information on recent benchmark revisions is available online at www.bls.gov/web/laus/benchmark.pdf.

Area definitions

The substate area data published in this news release reflect the delineations issued by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget on April 10, 2018. Data reflect New England City and Town Area (NECTA) definitions, rather than county-based definitions, in the six New England States. A detailed list of the geographic definitions is available online at www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm.

Reliability of the estimates

The estimates presented in this news release are based on sample surveys, administrative data, and modeling and, thus, are subject to sampling and other types of errors. Sampling error is a measure of sampling variability-that is, variation that occurs by chance because a sample rather than the entire population is surveyed. Survey data also are subject to nonsampling errors, such as those which can be introduced into the data collection and processing operations. Estimates not directly derived from sample surveys are subject to additional errors resulting from the specific estimation processes used. The sums of individual items may not always equal the totals shown in the same tables because of rounding.

Use of error measures

Additional information

Estimates of unadjusted and seasonally adjusted civilian labor force and unemployment data for states and seven substate areas are available in the news release State Employment and Unemployment. Estimates of civilian labor force and unemployment for all states, metropolitan areas, counties, cities with a population of 25,000 or more, and other areas used in the administration of various federal economic assistance programs are available online at www.bls.gov/lau/. Employment data from the CES program are available on the BLS website at www.bls.gov/sae/.

Information in this news release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Alabama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,212,503

2,269,499

2,205,363

2,259,373

81,676

54,941

73,717

55,794

3.7

2.4

3.3

2.5

Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville. . . . . . . . . . .

45,795

46,702

45,801

46,428

2,001

1,330

1,819

1,355

4.4

2.8

4.0

2.9

Auburn-Opelika. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76,149

78,443

76,282

78,483

2,539

1,668

2,299

1,722

3.3

2.1

3.0

2.2

Birmingham-Hoover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

548,653

562,703

548,078

561,598

18,447

12,306

16,618

12,490

3.4

2.2

3.0

2.2

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93,506

97,082

92,774

96,415

3,228

2,122

2,934

2,195

3.5

2.2

3.2

2.3

Decatur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71,190

73,390

71,190

73,253

2,359

1,607

2,147

1,637

3.3

2.2

3.0

2.2

Dothan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,152

64,021

62,325

63,677

2,469

1,544

2,193

1,604

3.9

2.4

3.5

2.5

Florence-Muscle Shoals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,258

67,307

65,949

66,917

2,615

1,819

2,346

1,836

3.9

2.7

3.6

2.7

Gadsden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43,394

44,402

43,063

44,201

1,669

1,239

1,523

1,186

3.8

2.8

3.5

2.7

Huntsville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

224,628

232,480

224,908

231,907

7,441

4,764

6,598

4,799

3.3

2.0

2.9

2.1

Mobile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188,386

192,647

187,958

192,046

8,147

5,722

7,367

5,793

4.3

3.0

3.9

3.0

Montgomery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

172,359

176,740

171,846

175,730

6,430

4,295

5,773

4,333

3.7

2.4

3.4

2.5

Tuscaloosa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117,409

121,337

117,080

120,788

3,945

2,699

3,640

2,801

3.4

2.2

3.1

2.3

Alaska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

354,262

344,026

353,278

342,571

21,539

19,289

22,657

20,638

6.1

5.6

6.4

6.0

Anchorage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

199,196

193,150

201,422

195,479

11,106

9,721

11,379

10,228

5.6

5.0

5.6

5.2

Fairbanks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,270

44,631

46,182

44,398

2,433

2,180

2,573

2,356

5.3

4.9

5.6

5.3

Arizona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,491,620

3,599,850

3,512,594

3,622,661

170,174

155,340

166,722

157,057

4.9

4.3

4.7

4.3

Flagstaff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78,808

80,225

77,887

79,453

4,152

3,783

4,115

3,779

5.3

4.7

5.3

4.8

Lake Havasu City-Kingman. . . . . . . . . . . .

86,465

89,061

86,525

89,749

4,915

4,657

4,997

4,798

5.7

5.2

5.8

5.3

Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,440,085

2,527,808

2,459,584

2,545,071

102,079

93,956

102,136

95,656

4.2

3.7

4.2

3.8

Prescott. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

107,103

109,304

107,496

110,144

4,754

4,400

4,882

4,575

4.4

4.0

4.5

4.2

Sierra Vista-Douglas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,156

51,811

50,734

51,968

2,805

2,631

2,844

2,761

5.6

5.1

5.6

5.3

Tucson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

491,259

504,239

495,039

508,946

21,941

20,638

22,132

20,950

4.5

4.1

4.5

4.1

Yuma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104,775

102,415

103,119

102,582

19,431

16,458

16,107

15,762

18.5

16.1

15.6

15.4

Arkansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,355,060

1,371,482

1,351,062

1,368,523

44,065

43,551

43,405

43,732

3.3

3.2

3.2

3.2

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers. . . . . . . . .

276,369

286,907

275,869

286,326

6,889

6,492

6,644

6,400

2.5

2.3

2.4

2.2

Fort Smith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

118,933

118,795

118,675

118,861

4,093

4,122

3,890

4,056

3.4

3.5

3.3

3.4

Hot Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40,404

40,985

40,099

40,662

1,514

1,420

1,463

1,386

3.7

3.5

3.6

3.4

Jonesboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,667

66,146

64,643

66,130

1,794

1,694

1,749

1,669

2.8

2.6

2.7

2.5

Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway. . . .

355,560

360,122

353,968

359,984

10,672

10,735

10,347

10,702

3.0

3.0

2.9

3.0

Pine Bluff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35,546

35,246

35,338

34,907

1,602

1,645

1,603

1,696

4.5

4.7

4.5

4.9

California. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19,542,699

19,588,210

19,562,413

19,616,666

772,789

719,195

760,287

719,250

4.0

3.7

3.9

3.7

Bakersfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

392,498

393,210

388,958

389,849

25,417

23,993

25,161

24,843

6.5

6.1

6.5

6.4

Chico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104,924

104,426

103,625

103,395

4,418

3,992

4,503

4,100

4.2

3.8

4.3

4.0

El Centro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72,081

74,108

72,596

74,280

14,209

15,642

13,455

15,309

19.7

21.1

18.5

20.6

Fresno. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

447,143

450,299

449,306

451,121

28,434

26,273

30,606

29,498

6.4

5.8

6.8

6.5

Hanford-Corcoran. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57,747

57,914

57,493

57,885

3,604

3,632

3,951

4,085

6.2

6.3

6.9

7.1

Los Angeles-LongBeach-Anaheim. . . . .

6,806,284

6,797,275

6,817,785

6,833,846

286,727

275,353

278,806

261,949

4.2

4.1

4.1

3.8

Madera. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61,415

61,537

60,846

61,012

3,571

3,318

3,726

3,703

5.8

5.4

6.1

6.1

Merced. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116,860

118,254

114,185

116,352

7,272

6,805

7,808

7,581

6.2

5.8

6.8

6.5

Modesto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

243,913

243,933

242,704

242,768

13,201

11,844

13,668

12,677

5.4

4.9

5.6

5.2

Napa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,762

75,414

73,517

73,636

1,927

1,748

1,934

1,893

2.5

2.3

2.6

2.6

Oxnard-ThousandOaks-Ventura. . . . . . .

427,355

423,843

428,472

424,712

15,761

13,914

15,726

14,476

3.7

3.3

3.7

3.4

Redding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,087

74,764

74,406

74,080

3,247

2,827

3,235

2,925

4.3

3.8

4.3

3.9

Riverside-SanBernardino-Ontario. . . . . .

2,071,476

2,078,795

2,086,173

2,092,615

85,350

77,097

80,930

75,864

4.1

3.7

3.9

3.6

Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade. . .

1,104,825

1,103,783

1,108,474

1,106,907

38,370

34,585

37,570

35,235

3.5

3.1

3.4

3.2

Salinas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

226,619

228,088

221,037

222,561

9,263

8,380

10,618

10,070

4.1

3.7

4.8

4.5

San Diego-Carlsbad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,604,579

1,611,237

1,607,105

1,613,206

51,942

45,952

50,138

46,119

3.2

2.9

3.1

2.9

San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. . . . . . .

2,608,606

2,633,310

2,617,117

2,630,977

68,309

61,088

65,402

60,963

2.6

2.3

2.5

2.3

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara. . . . . . .

1,086,645

1,101,952

1,090,373

1,103,362

27,599

25,273

26,422

25,485

2.5

2.3

2.4

2.3

San Luis Obispo-PasoRobles-Arroyo

Grande. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142,915

142,963

142,702

142,509

3,937

3,480

3,817

3,571

2.8

2.4

2.7

2.5

Santa Cruz-Watsonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

144,629

144,394

142,585

142,339

5,164

4,809

5,837

5,618

3.6

3.3

4.1

3.9

Santa Maria-Santa Barbara. . . . . . . . . . . .

218,635

219,350

218,589

218,707

7,312

6,585

7,329

6,878

3.3

3.0

3.4

3.1

Santa Rosa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

265,201

264,425

261,752

261,799

6,687

6,035

6,502

6,209

2.5

2.3

2.5

2.4

Stockton-Lodi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

329,029

326,961

326,746

324,747

17,168

16,229

17,860

17,246

5.2

5.0

5.5

5.3

Vallejo-Fairfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

210,499

208,941

210,504

208,465

7,601

6,800

7,475

6,926

3.6

3.3

3.6

3.3

Visalia-Porterville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201,854

202,693

203,862

203,535

16,931

16,226

17,396

17,303

8.4

8.0

8.5

8.5

Yuba City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74,629

74,678

74,294

75,352

4,233

3,852

4,627

4,288

5.7

5.2

6.2

5.7

Colorado. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,135,286

3,178,231

3,133,401

3,181,397

106,223

75,810

111,166

79,586

3.4

2.4

3.5

2.5

Boulder. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

197,284

199,825

196,896

199,892

5,897

4,155

5,905

4,197

3.0

2.1

3.0

2.1

Colorado Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

356,469

361,924

356,109

363,747

14,362

10,112

15,008

10,630

4.0

2.8

4.2

2.9

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,666,651

1,687,201

1,659,436

1,688,087

54,623

39,396

56,732

40,641

3.3

2.3

3.4

2.4

Fort Collins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

206,009

211,608

206,475

211,506

6,069

4,237

6,222

4,389

2.9

2.0

3.0

2.1

Grand Junction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,589

78,346

77,634

77,993

3,022

2,173

3,253

2,300

3.9

2.8

4.2

2.9

Greeley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

169,734

173,988

168,221

172,731

5,233

3,818

5,352

3,992

3.1

2.2

3.2

2.3

Pueblo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76,607

76,350

76,703

76,897

3,846

2,695

4,045

2,890

5.0

3.5

5.3

3.8

Connecticut. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,915,336

1,929,565

1,920,441

1,934,041

66,683

67,229

60,478

63,780

3.5

3.5

3.1

3.3

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk. . . . . . . . . . .

466,514

471,753

470,566

473,847

16,515

16,644

14,932

15,824

3.5

3.5

3.2

3.3

Danbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106,623

107,736

107,558

108,310

3,056

3,077

2,775

2,971

2.9

2.9

2.6

2.7

Hartford-WestHartford-East Hartford. . . .

630,843

632,683

631,538

634,231

21,802

22,334

19,784

21,055

3.5

3.5

3.1

3.3

New Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

330,043

332,945

329,597

332,942

11,324

11,378

10,176

10,683

3.4

3.4

3.1

3.2

See footnotes at end of table.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area - Continued

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Connecticut - Continued

Norwich-NewLondon-Westerly. . . . . . . . .

142,468

143,035

142,507

143,530

4,754

4,761

4,508

4,656

3.3

3.3

3.2

3.2

Waterbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

112,797

113,439

113,033

113,807

4,924

4,849

4,563

4,623

4.4

4.3

4.0

4.1

Delaware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

481,871

490,529

482,804

493,066

16,101

18,760

14,349

18,110

3.3

3.8

3.0

3.7

Dover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78,126

80,094

78,215

80,169

2,796

3,402

2,451

3,182

3.6

4.2

3.1

4.0

Salisbury1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

189,219

190,816

187,353

189,123

7,764

7,655

8,390

8,946

4.1

4.0

4.5

4.7

District of Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

402,446

408,339

402,811

415,088

21,315

21,835

20,563

20,558

5.3

5.3

5.1

5.0

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. . . . . . .

3,393,284

3,487,666

3,385,124

3,492,075

104,742

98,416

98,787

96,779

3.1

2.8

2.9

2.8

Florida. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,305,265

10,566,507

10,293,133

10,479,146

340,078

307,598

335,916

287,779

3.3

2.9

3.3

2.7

Cape Coral-Fort Myers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343,976

356,370

346,877

356,213

10,996

9,996

10,902

9,432

3.2

2.8

3.1

2.6

Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin. . . .

126,655

130,198

125,952

128,376

3,433

3,021

3,539

2,998

2.7

2.3

2.8

2.3

Deltona-DaytonaBeach-Ormond

Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

302,842

306,739

301,176

305,407

10,685

9,734

10,604

9,317

3.5

3.2

3.5

3.1

Gainesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

147,079

147,623

145,611

146,363

4,466

4,077

4,352

3,725

3.0

2.8

3.0

2.5

Homosassa Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48,201

48,568

47,863

48,116

2,307

2,006

2,317

1,966

4.8

4.1

4.8

4.1

Jacksonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

775,655

800,072

769,881

792,056

24,420

22,443

23,986

20,946

3.1

2.8

3.1

2.6

Lakeland-Winter Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

304,059

306,181

302,265

305,445

11,390

10,414

11,074

9,662

3.7

3.4

3.7

3.2

Miami-FortLauderdale-West Palm

Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,163,808

3,270,402

3,168,158

3,221,968

107,396

94,652

101,211

87,410

3.4

2.9

3.2

2.7

Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island. . . . . . . .

176,782

181,170

179,149

183,849

5,881

5,326

5,661

4,925

3.3

2.9

3.2

2.7

North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton. . . . . . . . .

365,580

370,882

365,866

372,749

11,592

10,407

11,603

9,975

3.2

2.8

3.2

2.7

Ocala. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

136,819

139,549

136,236

138,467

5,368

4,745

5,365

4,562

3.9

3.4

3.9

3.3

Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford. . . . . . . . . . .

1,355,177

1,395,626

1,353,797

1,385,303

40,714

37,790

40,219

35,144

3.0

2.7

3.0

2.5

Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville. . . . . . . . .

279,292

287,068

277,669

285,519

9,001

8,387

8,991

7,937

3.2

2.9

3.2

2.8

Panama City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94,288

93,348

95,413

91,719

2,839

2,760

6,687

2,606

3.0

3.0

7.0

2.8

Pensacola-FerryPass-Brent. . . . . . . . . . .

228,630

229,930

227,183

228,240

7,115

6,542

7,121

6,214

3.1

2.8

3.1

2.7

Port St. Lucie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

219,745

223,359

219,678

222,195

8,150

7,407

7,992

6,945

3.7

3.3

3.6

3.1

Punta Gorda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71,114

72,667

71,476

73,100

2,685

2,378

2,710

2,326

3.8

3.3

3.8

3.2

Sebastian-Vero Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65,536

67,312

66,266

67,818

2,586

2,296

2,529

2,152

3.9

3.4

3.8

3.2

Sebring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35,682

35,920

36,158

36,277

1,631

1,468

1,636

1,406

4.6

4.1

4.5

3.9

Tallahassee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

196,582

202,052

196,231

200,427

6,228

5,771

6,216

5,266

3.2

2.9

3.2

2.6

Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater. . . . . .

1,543,442

1,572,438

1,536,852

1,562,597

49,462

45,318

49,015

42,767

3.2

2.9

3.2

2.7

The Villages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31,324

32,127

31,335

32,097

1,443

1,271

1,508

1,324

4.6

4.0

4.8

4.1

Georgia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,112,773

5,132,608

5,111,058

5,124,821

191,762

156,277

176,023

139,294

3.8

3.0

3.4

2.7

Albany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67,416

66,773

68,204

66,712

3,062

2,447

3,019

2,262

4.5

3.7

4.4

3.4

Athens-Clarke County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103,341

102,735

103,622

102,378

3,704

2,888

3,259

2,490

3.6

2.8

3.1

2.4

Atlanta-SandySprings-Roswell. . . . . . . . .

3,073,624

3,098,361

3,066,497

3,093,261

109,747

89,284

100,086

79,695

3.6

2.9

3.3

2.6

Augusta-Richmond County. . . . . . . . . . . . .

266,838

268,468

266,171

268,091

10,426

8,147

9,545

7,527

3.9

3.0

3.6

2.8

Brunswick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53,382

53,603

53,430

53,524

1,980

1,638

1,784

1,416

3.7

3.1

3.3

2.6

Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124,934

123,569

124,888

123,115

5,439

4,317

4,942

3,934

4.4

3.5

4.0

3.2

Dalton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61,094

61,253

60,942

60,534

2,809

2,705

2,619

2,194

4.6

4.4

4.3

3.6

Gainesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103,346

104,994

103,495

105,044

3,166

2,497

2,812

2,195

3.1

2.4

2.7

2.1

Hinesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33,697

33,831

33,634

33,754

1,346

1,160

1,232

1,041

4.0

3.4

3.7

3.1

Macon-Bibb County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104,212

103,651

104,859

103,931

4,465

3,439

4,162

3,049

4.3

3.3

4.0

2.9

Rome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44,214

44,712

44,113

44,682

1,850

1,471

1,673

1,389

4.2

3.3

3.8

3.1

Savannah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188,232

187,966

187,340

188,546

6,639

5,491

5,963

4,845

3.5

2.9

3.2

2.6

Valdosta. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,938

64,945

65,291

65,045

2,564

2,054

2,266

1,873

3.9

3.2

3.5

2.9

Warner Robins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86,457

86,015

86,877

85,677

3,918

2,747

3,844

2,314

4.5

3.2

4.4

2.7

Hawaii. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

673,215

663,422

678,100

668,035

17,405

17,488

18,287

16,956

2.6

2.6

2.7

2.5

Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

84,790

83,939

85,147

84,260

2,274

2,280

2,297

2,121

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.5

Urban Honolulu. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

462,290

456,535

466,316

459,950

10,977

11,087

12,004

10,880

2.4

2.4

2.6

2.4

Idaho. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

862,938

888,317

861,411

887,360

19,220

20,718

22,900

25,151

2.2

2.3

2.7

2.8

Boise City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

361,662

373,204

365,395

377,621

7,968

8,743

9,259

10,562

2.2

2.3

2.5

2.8

Coeur d'Alene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,092

79,313

77,644

79,169

2,027

2,197

2,520

2,555

2.6

2.8

3.2

3.2

Idaho Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70,883

74,007

71,129

74,627

1,323

1,429

1,538

1,720

1.9

1.9

2.2

2.3

Lewiston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31,125

31,976

31,433

32,265

849

905

1,015

995

2.7

2.8

3.2

3.1

Pocatello. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41,812

43,336

42,426

43,789

922

1,003

1,098

1,169

2.2

2.3

2.6

2.7

Twin Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53,047

54,351

52,998

54,311

1,125

1,191

1,306

1,501

2.1

2.2

2.5

2.8

Illinois. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,477,162

6,487,355

6,468,774

6,447,310

263,231

235,472

259,018

218,259

4.1

3.6

4.0

3.4

Bloomington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96,188

96,249

95,626

95,238

4,142

3,353

3,949

2,984

4.3

3.5

4.1

3.1

Carbondale-Marion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61,427

62,494

61,426

62,365

2,893

2,339

2,817

2,097

4.7

3.7

4.6

3.4

Champaign-Urbana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

122,180

125,578

121,100

124,048

5,553

4,432

5,205

3,902

4.5

3.5

4.3

3.1

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,877,420

4,873,069

4,873,710

4,852,539

182,549

168,980

172,179

158,665

3.7

3.5

3.5

3.3

Danville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33,416

33,417

33,218

33,036

1,956

1,627

1,914

1,516

5.9

4.9

5.8

4.6

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island1. . . . . . . . .

193,286

196,472

191,934

194,044

7,701

7,586

7,129

7,577

4.0

3.9

3.7

3.9

Decatur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,130

50,585

49,898

50,176

2,764

2,453

2,762

2,261

5.5

4.8

5.5

4.5

Kankakee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56,192

56,785

56,305

56,435

2,874

2,458

2,914

2,620

5.1

4.3

5.2

4.6

Peoria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181,323

180,216

181,127

177,301

8,920

7,574

8,694

7,071

4.9

4.2

4.8

4.0

Rockford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

167,798

168,985

171,319

168,016

9,039

8,527

16,052

8,529

5.4

5.0

9.4

5.1

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

111,527

112,484

111,458

111,781

4,715

3,926

4,646

3,597

4.2

3.5

4.2

3.2

Indiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,393,074

3,377,838

3,387,893

3,365,352

112,491

101,447

111,876

106,202

3.3

3.0

3.3

3.2

Bloomington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80,893

80,214

80,789

80,031

2,973

2,492

2,747

2,568

3.7

3.1

3.4

3.2

Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45,399

45,602

45,671

45,730

1,106

986

1,115

1,052

2.4

2.2

2.4

2.3

See footnotes at end of table.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area - Continued

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Indiana - Continued

Elkhart-Goshen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116,099

115,956

115,736

115,691

3,172

3,214

3,181

3,294

2.7

2.8

2.7

2.8

Evansville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

165,713

164,507

165,658

164,475

5,143

4,673

4,912

4,926

3.1

2.8

3.0

3.0

Fort Wayne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

219,048

221,972

217,697

218,994

6,646

7,209

6,327

6,881

3.0

3.2

2.9

3.1

Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson. . . . . . . . . .

1,066,591

1,061,054

1,063,148

1,059,419

33,614

29,085

32,520

30,552

3.2

2.7

3.1

2.9

Kokomo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37,350

37,713

39,569

37,561

1,350

1,204

3,161

1,265

3.6

3.2

8.0

3.4

Lafayette-West Lafayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113,795

110,440

112,984

109,718

3,574

3,076

3,353

3,198

3.1

2.8

3.0

2.9

Michigan City-La Porte. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47,608

47,221

47,787

47,162

1,892

1,679

1,935

1,829

4.0

3.6

4.0

3.9

Muncie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54,782

54,526

54,518

54,745

2,127

1,939

2,074

2,033

3.9

3.6

3.8

3.7

South Bend-Mishawaka. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

162,196

161,321

161,687

161,126

5,641

5,525

5,419

5,579

3.5

3.4

3.4

3.5

Terre Haute. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,549

76,499

77,361

76,418

3,306

2,759

3,183

2,994

4.3

3.6

4.1

3.9

Iowa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,695,446

1,774,385

1,691,018

1,768,820

31,524

38,168

31,556

41,064

1.9

2.2

1.9

2.3

Ames. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59,957

63,552

59,610

63,092

634

856

717

995

1.1

1.3

1.2

1.6

Cedar Rapids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

143,332

149,807

142,484

149,974

2,988

3,612

3,102

3,945

2.1

2.4

2.2

2.6

Des Moines-West Des Moines. . . . . . . . .

355,900

379,149

353,450

375,574

6,693

7,945

6,602

8,485

1.9

2.1

1.9

2.3

Dubuque. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,766

58,299

55,433

58,194

891

1,130

981

1,292

1.6

1.9

1.8

2.2

Iowa City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97,784

100,820

97,193

100,275

1,426

1,616

1,476

1,813

1.5

1.6

1.5

1.8

Sioux City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93,462

96,315

93,244

96,877

1,790

2,310

1,859

2,469

1.9

2.4

2.0

2.5

Waterloo-Cedar Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90,152

93,647

89,642

92,709

1,693

2,347

1,696

2,470

1.9

2.5

1.9

2.7

Kansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,488,086

1,502,927

1,490,418

1,504,743

44,868

42,682

44,166

42,884

3.0

2.8

3.0

2.8

Lawrence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,491

67,012

66,643

67,306

1,765

1,742

1,767

1,752

2.7

2.6

2.7

2.6

Manhattan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,305

49,434

49,471

49,454

1,235

1,207

1,273

1,233

2.5

2.4

2.6

2.5

Topeka. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120,026

122,632

119,877

122,399

3,842

3,516

3,712

3,598

3.2

2.9

3.1

2.9

Wichita. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

309,637

311,349

310,890

313,687

10,347

9,790

10,140

9,893

3.3

3.1

3.3

3.2

Kentucky. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,050,539

2,074,332

2,054,178

2,088,173

79,263

77,635

72,305

80,388

3.9

3.7

3.5

3.8

Bowling Green. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83,503

85,337

83,633

85,354

2,947

3,044

2,630

3,001

3.5

3.6

3.1

3.5

Elizabethtown-Fort Knox. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67,085

67,535

67,239

67,826

2,557

2,472

2,310

2,570

3.8

3.7

3.4

3.8

Lexington-Fayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

271,383

277,046

272,920

278,339

8,521

8,126

7,455

8,411

3.1

2.9

2.7

3.0

Louisville/Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . . .

664,268

672,615

666,983

676,072

23,668

21,991

21,900

22,732

3.6

3.3

3.3

3.4

Owensboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,735

55,593

55,542

55,831

1,997

1,852

1,807

1,906

3.6

3.3

3.3

3.4

Louisiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,105,178

2,101,385

2,098,944

2,109,952

97,073

98,917

90,359

102,329

4.6

4.7

4.3

4.8

Alexandria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62,872

62,306

62,595

62,275

3,221

3,127

3,053

3,306

5.1

5.0

4.9

5.3

Baton Rouge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

419,725

421,133

419,997

423,482

17,505

18,141

16,093

18,655

4.2

4.3

3.8

4.4

Hammond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54,306

54,937

54,174

55,245

2,757

2,866

2,615

2,976

5.1

5.2

4.8

5.4

Houma-Thibodaux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87,597

85,399

86,786

84,925

4,060

3,935

3,747

4,038

4.6

4.6

4.3

4.8

Lafayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

212,434

212,318

211,594

211,512

9,781

9,852

9,135

10,188

4.6

4.6

4.3

4.8

Lake Charles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

114,405

113,891

113,932

113,302

4,061

4,332

3,781

4,583

3.5

3.8

3.3

4.0

Monroe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79,544

78,325

79,585

79,153

4,056

4,199

3,837

4,399

5.1

5.4

4.8

5.6

New Orleans-Metairie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

598,756

601,544

596,750

607,415

26,182

26,310

24,191

26,808

4.4

4.4

4.1

4.4

Shreveport-Bossier City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

186,718

183,900

186,258

185,583

9,269

9,467

8,654

9,815

5.0

5.1

4.6

5.3

Maine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

699,745

692,566

693,756

687,881

20,500

16,386

23,036

18,444

2.9

2.4

3.3

2.7

Bangor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72,269

71,764

71,476

71,587

2,208

1,739

2,359

1,871

3.1

2.4

3.3

2.6

Lewiston-Auburn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56,399

55,858

55,925

55,682

1,653

1,370

1,814

1,452

2.9

2.5

3.2

2.6

Portland-South Portland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

209,715

208,723

208,589

207,544

5,248

4,260

5,820

4,623

2.5

2.0

2.8

2.2

Maryland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,198,764

3,297,387

3,191,352

3,292,061

115,284

106,455

109,903

105,249

3.6

3.2

3.4

3.2

Baltimore-Columbia-Towson. . . . . . . . . . .

1,496,052

1,547,824

1,495,407

1,545,363

54,728

50,710

51,551

49,510

3.7

3.3

3.4

3.2

California-Lexington Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,244

56,626

54,961

56,420

1,856

1,662

1,776

1,622

3.4

2.9

3.2

2.9

Cumberland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44,515

45,768

44,339

45,370

2,068

2,285

2,034

2,257

4.6

5.0

4.6

5.0

Hagerstown-Martinsburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131,799

136,278

132,392

137,341

5,027

4,442

4,808

4,346

3.8

3.3

3.6

3.2

Massachusetts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,817,350

3,840,687

3,823,218

3,837,116

104,354

94,594

98,823

88,675

2.7

2.5

2.6

2.3

Barnstable Town. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127,539

127,842

124,516

123,533

3,680

3,411

4,012

3,708

2.9

2.7

3.2

3.0

Boston-Cambridge-Nashua. . . . . . . . . . . .

2,821,289

2,844,515

2,827,796

2,844,941

71,261

65,300

66,984

60,618

2.5

2.3

2.4

2.1

Leominster-Gardner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82,000

82,429

82,856

82,991

2,513

2,273

2,369

2,198

3.1

2.8

2.9

2.6

New Bedford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86,114

86,299

86,990

86,898

3,452

3,185

3,277

3,029

4.0

3.7

3.8

3.5

Pittsfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43,365

43,242

43,319

43,164

1,396

1,242

1,462

1,257

3.2

2.9

3.4

2.9

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

384,172

389,514

385,892

390,230

12,769

11,879

12,003

11,059

3.3

3.0

3.1

2.8

Worcester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

362,453

361,317

364,388

361,837

10,906

9,992

10,166

9,368

3.0

2.8

2.8

2.6

Michigan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,909,341

4,938,576

4,893,580

4,934,862

181,296

174,052

166,773

157,495

3.7

3.5

3.4

3.2

Ann Arbor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

195,442

195,853

196,725

199,308

5,517

4,988

4,947

4,436

2.8

2.5

2.5

2.2

Battle Creek. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62,506

61,982

63,021

62,912

2,174

2,183

2,109

2,026

3.5

3.5

3.3

3.2

Bay City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,815

49,338

50,164

49,857

1,788

2,030

1,754

1,833

3.6

4.1

3.5

3.7

Detroit-Warren-Dearborn. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,149,643

2,175,085

2,129,400

2,148,174

93,159

81,502

78,916

72,550

4.3

3.7

3.7

3.4

Flint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

180,469

183,267

181,767

184,491

7,110

8,840

6,935

7,020

3.9

4.8

3.8

3.8

Grand Rapids-Wyoming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

575,240

573,670

578,696

580,641

14,604

14,206

13,815

13,481

2.5

2.5

2.4

2.3

Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73,850

73,356

74,347

74,749

2,372

2,411

2,310

2,238

3.2

3.3

3.1

3.0

Kalamazoo-Portage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

168,725

168,748

168,969

170,354

5,069

5,195

4,929

4,808

3.0

3.1

2.9

2.8

Lansing-East Lansing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

249,413

253,187

251,305

254,591

7,109

9,104

7,526

6,466

2.9

3.6

3.0

2.5

Midland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40,098

39,688

40,274

40,358

1,252

1,246

1,212

1,220

3.1

3.1

3.0

3.0

Monroe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76,181

75,156

76,390

76,354

2,971

2,209

2,794

2,190

3.9

2.9

3.7

2.9

Muskegon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,167

77,846

77,669

79,216

2,906

2,801

2,759

2,823

3.8

3.6

3.6

3.6

Niles-Benton Harbor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72,430

73,052

72,828

73,810

2,489

2,281

2,452

2,307

3.4

3.1

3.4

3.1

Saginaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86,163

85,777

87,094

87,437

3,255

4,119

3,224

3,388

3.8

4.8

3.7

3.9

See footnotes at end of table.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area - Continued

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Minnesota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,077,928

3,138,147

3,073,359

3,129,485

68,733

79,870

69,288

89,398

2.2

2.5

2.3

2.9

Duluth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142,608

145,204

143,339

145,571

3,945

4,579

4,386

5,639

2.8

3.2

3.1

3.9

Mankato-North Mankato. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62,681

64,496

61,952

64,315

1,147

1,293

1,052

1,298

1.8

2.0

1.7

2.0

Minneapolis-St.Paul-Bloomington. . . . . .

2,003,584

2,032,710

2,005,563

2,032,283

43,886

51,492

41,742

54,157

2.2

2.5

2.1

2.7

Rochester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

123,772

127,239

122,834

126,030

2,328

2,653

2,314

2,940

1.9

2.1

1.9

2.3

St. Cloud. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

112,734

115,833

112,343

115,111

2,441

2,690

2,548

3,158

2.2

2.3

2.3

2.7

Mississippi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,270,344

1,283,688

1,274,959

1,284,175

54,552

66,490

53,790

70,042

4.3

5.2

4.2

5.5

Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula. . . . . . . . . . . . .

162,291

166,060

162,915

166,323

7,300

8,631

7,248

9,150

4.5

5.2

4.4

5.5

Hattiesburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69,102

70,913

69,997

71,592

2,568

3,120

2,518

3,260

3.7

4.4

3.6

4.6

Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269,116

272,560

270,220

271,635

10,237

12,330

10,015

12,973

3.8

4.5

3.7

4.8

Missouri. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,045,583

3,141,604

3,039,341

3,128,004

70,459

79,156

75,593

93,595

2.3

2.5

2.5

3.0

Cape Girardeau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47,736

49,358

47,942

49,295

1,056

1,232

1,143

1,513

2.2

2.5

2.4

3.1

Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98,061

100,325

97,940

100,132

1,549

1,719

1,730

2,172

1.6

1.7

1.8

2.2

Jefferson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73,192

75,018

72,897

74,757

1,352

1,435

1,470

1,863

1.8

1.9

2.0

2.5

Joplin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83,833

86,192

83,847

86,116

1,751

2,066

1,897

2,477

2.1

2.4

2.3

2.9

Kansas City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,134,437

1,162,766

1,131,451

1,161,907

30,859

31,028

31,057

33,093

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.8

St. Joseph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,085

64,177

63,040

63,598

1,369

1,474

1,463

1,666

2.2

2.3

2.3

2.6

St. Louis2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,455,409

1,501,286

1,452,805

1,496,955

41,198

40,959

42,518

44,233

2.8

2.7

2.9

3.0

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

230,389

237,403

231,420

238,243

4,475

5,263

4,895

6,606

1.9

2.2

2.1

2.8

Montana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

528,418

534,388

527,399

537,146

17,784

16,680

18,980

18,309

3.4

3.1

3.6

3.4

Billings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86,558

86,947

86,316

87,374

2,698

2,531

2,753

2,684

3.1

2.9

3.2

3.1

Great Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37,765

38,002

37,827

38,255

1,249

1,190

1,281

1,226

3.3

3.1

3.4

3.2

Missoula. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,595

64,892

63,291

64,951

1,898

1,812

2,011

1,989

3.0

2.8

3.2

3.1

Nebraska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,022,354

1,045,946

1,020,931

1,046,220

25,751

30,541

23,458

28,999

2.5

2.9

2.3

2.8

Grand Island. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43,288

44,580

43,231

43,914

1,116

1,863

1,067

1,249

2.6

4.2

2.5

2.8

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183,949

186,605

182,547

187,143

4,350

5,031

3,825

4,926

2.4

2.7

2.1

2.6

Omaha-Council Bluffs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

488,718

509,532

486,576

506,412

12,330

13,934

11,586

13,689

2.5

2.7

2.4

2.7

Nevada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,516,177

1,567,125

1,518,855

1,572,315

64,664

58,495

64,041

54,471

4.3

3.7

4.2

3.5

Carson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25,709

26,903

25,759

26,853

1,062

924

1,079

890

4.1

3.4

4.2

3.3

Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise. . . . . . . .

1,110,177

1,139,764

1,108,053

1,145,579

50,049

45,267

49,415

41,951

4.5

4.0

4.5

3.7

Reno. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

256,884

271,567

260,367

272,715

8,518

7,766

8,447

7,297

3.3

2.9

3.2

2.7

New Hampshire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

759,725

774,283

761,578

775,060

15,191

17,913

16,449

17,697

2.0

2.3

2.2

2.3

Dover-Durham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

85,611

86,862

85,912

86,786

1,603

1,833

1,750

1,827

1.9

2.1

2.0

2.1

Manchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120,021

122,210

120,902

123,211

2,333

2,715

2,484

2,709

1.9

2.2

2.1

2.2

Portsmouth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,403

78,521

77,128

78,369

1,529

1,650

1,655

1,610

2.0

2.1

2.1

2.1

New Jersey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,412,319

4,557,721

4,409,867

4,563,111

154,190

149,755

145,777

150,539

3.5

3.3

3.3

3.3

Atlantic City-Hammonton. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

119,829

123,706

118,704

122,463

5,558

5,631

5,504

5,778

4.6

4.6

4.6

4.7

Ocean City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43,479

46,362

41,888

45,355

2,485

2,371

3,601

3,604

5.7

5.1

8.6

7.9

Trenton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

196,542

205,039

197,184

205,574

6,125

6,094

5,698

5,989

3.1

3.0

2.9

2.9

Vineland-Bridgeton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,062

67,429

64,269

67,573

3,179

3,231

3,200

3,349

5.0

4.8

5.0

5.0

New Mexico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

948,513

967,324

952,647

970,731

46,182

43,970

46,012

44,575

4.9

4.5

4.8

4.6

Albuquerque. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

433,428

442,134

436,153

444,243

20,466

19,351

19,947

19,148

4.7

4.4

4.6

4.3

Farmington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53,202

54,262

53,171

53,756

2,944

2,853

2,926

2,948

5.5

5.3

5.5

5.5

Las Cruces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97,751

99,635

98,138

99,907

5,163

4,956

5,291

5,242

5.3

5.0

5.4

5.2

Santa Fe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74,709

74,456

75,162

75,486

3,114

2,750

3,068

2,736

4.2

3.7

4.1

3.6

New York. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,603,222

9,583,705

9,576,358

9,511,374

347,452

373,274

339,417

345,862

3.6

3.9

3.5

3.6

Albany-Schenectady-Troy. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

455,703

450,192

453,576

450,885

14,368

15,466

14,178

14,409

3.2

3.4

3.1

3.2

Binghamton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

108,095

106,792

107,389

105,918

4,063

4,446

4,036

4,233

3.8

4.2

3.8

4.0

Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls. . . . .

546,329

546,830

542,340

541,404

19,978

21,931

20,485

21,349

3.7

4.0

3.8

3.9

Elmira. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35,258

34,995

35,394

34,747

1,368

1,407

1,286

1,283

3.9

4.0

3.6

3.7

Glens Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59,607

58,890

59,462

58,492

1,972

2,124

2,272

2,337

3.3

3.6

3.8

4.0

Ithaca. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,467

52,287

51,313

51,775

1,593

1,820

1,539

1,564

3.1

3.5

3.0

3.0

Kingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89,936

89,805

89,005

88,809

2,874

3,064

2,804

2,874

3.2

3.4

3.2

3.2

New York-Newark-Jersey City. . . . . . . . . .

9,937,952

10,027,732

9,916,030

9,978,678

356,047

368,011

337,329

342,886

3.6

3.7

3.4

3.4

Rochester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

526,171

527,410

523,910

524,957

18,247

20,214

18,382

19,409

3.5

3.8

3.5

3.7

Syracuse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

309,179

311,209

308,308

309,043

10,697

12,096

11,044

11,509

3.5

3.9

3.6

3.7

Utica-Rome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129,561

128,471

129,908

128,168

4,698

5,052

4,910

4,999

3.6

3.9

3.8

3.9

Watertown-Fort Drum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44,263

44,323

44,450

44,186

1,834

2,150

2,179

2,446

4.1

4.9

4.9

5.5

North Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,007,407

5,153,426

4,992,016

5,109,338

181,089

185,225

180,250

173,571

3.6

3.6

3.6

3.4

Asheville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

236,145

247,607

235,217

244,234

6,727

7,059

6,747

6,432

2.8

2.9

2.9

2.6

Burlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

81,364

83,169

81,337

82,388

2,697

2,878

2,712

2,651

3.3

3.5

3.3

3.2

Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia. . . . . . . . . . . .

1,347,774

1,390,489

1,343,343

1,378,010

44,938

44,880

44,468

43,178

3.3

3.2

3.3

3.1

Durham-Chapel Hill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

299,396

307,411

298,863

304,153

9,517

9,845

9,521

8,998

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.0

Fayetteville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

148,334

150,831

148,750

150,016

7,173

7,230

7,185

6,841

4.8

4.8

4.8

4.6

Goldsboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52,831

52,844

52,416

53,185

2,104

2,076

2,123

1,923

4.0

3.9

4.1

3.6

Greensboro-High Point. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

370,424

377,189

368,821

374,071

13,763

14,299

14,077

13,342

3.7

3.8

3.8

3.6

Greenville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89,516

91,853

89,483

91,362

3,469

3,630

3,446

3,398

3.9

4.0

3.9

3.7

Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton. . . . . . . . . . . . .

175,686

177,416

176,130

176,695

5,733

6,187

5,863

5,731

3.3

3.5

3.3

3.2

Jacksonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,242

65,191

64,041

64,753

3,221

2,871

2,942

2,618

5.0

4.4

4.6

4.0

New Bern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,437

52,061

51,323

51,761

2,242

1,925

2,146

1,807

4.4

3.7

4.2

3.5

Raleigh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

714,682

742,595

711,827

735,911

22,561

23,310

22,460

21,718

3.2

3.1

3.2

3.0

Rocky Mount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65,370

65,522

65,596

65,393

3,248

3,210

3,177

2,976

5.0

4.9

4.8

4.6

See footnotes at end of table.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area - Continued

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

North Carolina - Continued

Wilmington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

149,297

156,333

149,949

155,563

5,842

5,080

5,511

4,755

3.9

3.2

3.7

3.1

Winston-Salem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

328,455

339,506

328,237

334,497

11,258

11,618

11,196

10,857

3.4

3.4

3.4

3.2

North Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

402,879

404,174

398,404

402,076

7,157

6,958

8,348

8,417

1.8

1.7

2.1

2.1

Bismarck. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,733

67,218

66,201

67,380

1,272

1,235

1,539

1,527

1.9

1.8

2.3

2.3

Fargo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

136,045

138,130

135,217

138,588

2,338

2,266

2,522

2,632

1.7

1.6

1.9

1.9

Grand Forks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54,312

55,032

54,111

54,816

964

1,007

1,108

1,180

1.8

1.8

2.0

2.2

Ohio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,774,153

5,826,663

5,754,616

5,822,254

246,996

227,937

243,308

220,841

4.3

3.9

4.2

3.8

Akron. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

359,552

359,555

358,174

359,485

15,539

14,823

15,524

14,371

4.3

4.1

4.3

4.0

Canton-Massillon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

200,307

202,151

199,757

201,861

9,099

8,785

9,122

8,860

4.5

4.3

4.6

4.4

Cincinnati. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,123,610

1,145,341

1,117,245

1,143,717

42,602

40,864

40,452

39,000

3.8

3.6

3.6

3.4

Cleveland-Elyria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,035,215

1,033,425

1,030,378

1,037,709

46,825

33,512

45,012

34,193

4.5

3.2

4.4

3.3

Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,089,855

1,105,977

1,085,672

1,109,726

40,923

38,993

39,665

37,130

3.8

3.5

3.7

3.3

Dayton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

386,105

393,175

385,780

392,168

16,357

16,373

15,893

14,826

4.2

4.2

4.1

3.8

Lima. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48,034

48,269

47,843

48,330

1,999

1,935

1,922

1,851

4.2

4.0

4.0

3.8

Mansfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52,608

52,944

52,471

53,495

2,359

2,263

2,433

2,339

4.5

4.3

4.6

4.4

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,368

64,668

63,182

64,062

2,770

3,245

2,703

2,748

4.4

5.0

4.3

4.3

Toledo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

302,636

305,030

302,741

303,197

14,240

12,838

14,287

12,223

4.7

4.2

4.7

4.0

Weirton-Steubenville1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,272

50,572

49,874

50,087

2,730

2,888

2,719

2,792

5.4

5.7

5.5

5.6

Youngstown-Warren-Boardman. . . . . . . .

240,096

238,388

239,635

237,398

13,085

13,118

12,986

13,181

5.4

5.5

5.4

5.6

Oklahoma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,844,742

1,856,199

1,845,292

1,841,383

56,342

61,944

53,190

63,239

3.1

3.3

2.9

3.4

Enid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27,276

27,026

27,183

26,805

737

795

704

862

2.7

2.9

2.6

3.2

Lawton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,024

51,351

51,118

51,228

1,897

1,877

1,774

1,899

3.7

3.7

3.5

3.7

Oklahoma City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

684,926

689,733

684,831

684,701

19,361

20,425

18,145

21,373

2.8

3.0

2.6

3.1

Tulsa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

478,148

480,273

480,197

476,306

15,072

17,053

14,250

16,614

3.2

3.6

3.0

3.5

Oregon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,117,663

2,119,417

2,117,387

2,109,609

83,429

74,476

85,731

65,040

3.9

3.5

4.0

3.1

Albany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58,855

59,176

58,968

58,830

2,640

2,391

2,779

2,100

4.5

4.0

4.7

3.6

Bend-Redmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95,831

97,296

96,098

96,530

3,689

3,270

4,002

2,982

3.8

3.4

4.2

3.1

Corvallis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,013

48,966

49,307

49,151

1,556

1,334

1,495

1,097

3.2

2.7

3.0

2.2

Eugene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

182,153

181,773

182,036

181,396

7,904

6,987

7,932

6,059

4.3

3.8

4.4

3.3

Grants Pass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36,382

36,501

36,131

36,179

1,846

1,635

1,948

1,467

5.1

4.5

5.4

4.1

Medford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106,374

106,829

105,973

106,454

4,591

3,882

4,778

3,408

4.3

3.6

4.5

3.2

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro. . . . . . . . . .

1,323,190

1,336,179

1,329,266

1,337,907

49,507

46,922

49,963

41,809

3.7

3.5

3.8

3.1

Salem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

203,005

201,962

202,927

200,139

8,332

7,545

8,566

6,519

4.1

3.7

4.2

3.3

Pennsylvania. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,444,551

6,570,222

6,437,401

6,542,425

248,016

285,827

233,777

278,771

3.8

4.4

3.6

4.3

Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton. . . . . . . . . . .

439,216

447,869

436,483

447,560

17,811

19,275

16,519

18,455

4.1

4.3

3.8

4.1

Altoona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58,745

60,475

59,220

60,346

2,210

2,703

2,136

2,697

3.8

4.5

3.6

4.5

Bloomsburg-Berwick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42,701

43,572

42,568

43,279

1,568

1,787

1,512

1,752

3.7

4.1

3.6

4.0

Chambersburg-Waynesboro. . . . . . . . . . .

76,976

79,518

77,501

79,510

2,540

3,014

2,390

2,913

3.3

3.8

3.1

3.7

East Stroudsburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

81,761

83,782

81,791

83,596

3,964

4,504

3,823

4,463

4.8

5.4

4.7

5.3

Erie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129,549

131,296

129,319

130,807

5,191

5,745

4,967

5,850

4.0

4.4

3.8

4.5

Gettysburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,105

56,027

54,921

55,512

1,677

1,805

1,481

1,727

3.0

3.2

2.7

3.1

Harrisburg-Carlisle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

296,672

300,768

296,465

300,750

9,960

11,652

9,410

10,971

3.4

3.9

3.2

3.6

Johnstown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58,404

59,548

58,204

59,254

2,556

2,898

2,478

3,028

4.4

4.9

4.3

5.1

Lancaster. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

281,454

285,656

279,701

284,655

8,674

9,979

8,078

9,394

3.1

3.5

2.9

3.3

Lebanon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70,870

73,280

71,018

72,892

2,445

2,852

2,279

2,747

3.4

3.9

3.2

3.8

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington. . . . . . .

3,096,866

3,173,357

3,093,266

3,164,985

118,481

131,058

109,302

125,591

3.8

4.1

3.5

4.0

Pittsburgh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,208,178

1,223,415

1,208,177

1,217,254

44,687

52,321

42,483

51,801

3.7

4.3

3.5

4.3

Reading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

212,363

218,185

212,784

217,231

8,138

9,517

7,618

9,202

3.8

4.4

3.6

4.2

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton. . . . . . .

276,991

281,092

278,639

279,906

12,575

14,506

12,079

14,513

4.5

5.2

4.3

5.2

State College. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82,361

84,535

82,865

84,411

2,367

2,784

2,138

2,638

2.9

3.3

2.6

3.1

Williamsport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56,607

57,812

56,381

57,587

2,292

2,626

2,290

2,655

4.0

4.5

4.1

4.6

York-Hanover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

233,944

237,502

234,006

237,194

8,178

9,235

7,627

8,802

3.5

3.9

3.3

3.7

Rhode Island. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

556,208

558,149

558,933

563,424

19,182

16,205

21,567

18,006

3.4

2.9

3.9

3.2

Providence-Warwick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

691,368

694,592

694,124

700,131

23,416

20,280

25,470

21,580

3.4

2.9

3.7

3.1

South Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,330,794

2,380,158

2,318,289

2,368,727

75,373

50,186

68,439

50,489

3.2

2.1

3.0

2.1

Charleston-North Charleston. . . . . . . . . . .

385,901

390,273

384,176

389,305

10,462

6,898

9,499

6,942

2.7

1.8

2.5

1.8

Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

399,763

403,810

396,103

403,000

12,397

7,981

11,276

8,087

3.1

2.0

2.8

2.0

Florence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96,054

97,356

95,928

97,230

3,476

2,236

3,156

2,241

3.6

2.3

3.3

2.3

Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin. . . . . . . . . . .

425,543

434,168

423,423

430,751

12,545

8,402

11,322

8,480

2.9

1.9

2.7

2.0

Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Beaufort. . . .

87,369

91,486

86,788

90,476

2,648

1,735

2,378

1,695

3.0

1.9

2.7

1.9

Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle

Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

197,538

207,486

194,464

203,876

8,343

6,163

7,916

6,162

4.2

3.0

4.1

3.0

Spartanburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

160,137

165,121

158,999

164,071

4,772

3,193

4,274

3,251

3.0

1.9

2.7

2.0

Sumter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44,164

44,657

44,107

44,503

1,638

1,115

1,502

1,146

3.7

2.5

3.4

2.6

South Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

461,575

470,707

461,667

471,210

12,065

13,387

12,749

14,944

2.6

2.8

2.8

3.2

Rapid City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74,560

75,789

74,378

75,429

2,129

2,288

2,272

2,591

2.9

3.0

3.1

3.4

Sioux Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

153,741

159,205

154,167

159,825

3,363

3,787

3,502

4,211

2.2

2.4

2.3

2.6

Tennessee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,259,609

3,354,882

3,255,813

3,355,085

106,795

105,783

98,204

103,165

3.3

3.2

3.0

3.1

Chattanooga. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

272,203

276,883

269,455

275,964

9,317

8,333

8,140

8,091

3.4

3.0

3.0

2.9

Clarksville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

115,031

118,995

115,539

118,607

4,434

4,824

4,047

4,444

3.9

4.1

3.5

3.7

Cleveland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57,630

58,870

58,783

59,824

1,982

1,880

1,841

1,890

3.4

3.2

3.1

3.2

Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,416

66,360

63,908

66,272

2,275

2,182

2,043

2,112

3.5

3.3

3.2

3.2

See footnotes at end of table.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area - Continued

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Tennessee - Continued

Johnson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91,597

93,448

90,880

93,495

3,218

3,048

2,999

3,098

3.5

3.3

3.3

3.3

Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

136,856

142,222

137,301

142,202

4,554

4,608

4,269

4,554

3.3

3.2

3.1

3.2

Knoxville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

422,838

437,611

421,738

437,679

13,058

12,629

12,123

12,549

3.1

2.9

2.9

2.9

Memphis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

636,392

646,723

639,381

649,688

24,943

24,725

22,951

25,246

3.9

3.8

3.6

3.9

Morristown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,558

53,145

51,356

53,266

1,783

1,842

1,698

1,829

3.5

3.5

3.3

3.4

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--

Franklin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,052,647

1,088,325

1,052,145

1,086,288

27,312

27,780

25,305

26,127

2.6

2.6

2.4

2.4

Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13,901,088

14,190,783

13,961,940

14,265,562

489,204

467,680

485,960

477,021

3.5

3.3

3.5

3.3

Abilene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,153

77,637

77,284

78,039

2,397

2,245

2,355

2,276

3.1

2.9

3.0

2.9

Amarillo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132,132

132,970

132,672

133,364

3,397

3,242

3,390

3,283

2.6

2.4

2.6

2.5

Austin-Round Rock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,203,065

1,230,534

1,207,111

1,234,797

33,376

31,388

32,915

31,359

2.8

2.6

2.7

2.5

Beaumont-Port Arthur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

177,316

178,164

176,834

177,867

9,074

8,827

9,150

9,214

5.1

5.0

5.2

5.2

Brownsville-Harlingen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

163,865

164,651

164,708

165,593

8,705

8,458

8,793

8,938

5.3

5.1

5.3

5.4

College Station-Bryan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

136,391

138,796

136,390

139,222

3,670

3,615

3,607

3,603

2.7

2.6

2.6

2.6

Corpus Christi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

207,479

209,883

209,039

210,576

8,945

8,230

8,937

8,517

4.3

3.9

4.3

4.0

Dallas-FortWorth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . . . .

3,928,885

4,030,421

3,948,427

4,061,740

128,366

123,844

126,608

123,322

3.3

3.1

3.2

3.0

El Paso. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

362,407

365,865

362,747

368,879

14,312

13,541

14,047

13,634

3.9

3.7

3.9

3.7

Houston-TheWoodlands-Sugar Land. . .

3,403,759

3,476,436

3,420,558

3,500,133

131,468

123,023

130,454

126,404

3.9

3.5

3.8

3.6

Killeen-Temple. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

176,049

180,120

177,549

181,634

6,956

6,337

6,849

6,435

4.0

3.5

3.9

3.5

Laredo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116,413

118,108

117,309

118,898

4,068

4,043

4,047

4,191

3.5

3.4

3.4

3.5

Longview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98,232

97,523

98,464

97,592

3,761

3,507

3,691

3,601

3.8

3.6

3.7

3.7

Lubbock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

162,976

165,275

163,408

165,689

4,587

4,371

4,493

4,332

2.8

2.6

2.7

2.6

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. . . . . . . . . . . . .

345,285

355,574

348,987

358,376

19,020

19,778

20,259

21,905

5.5

5.6

5.8

6.1

Midland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

107,454

108,004

107,736

108,457

2,106

2,243

2,083

2,313

2.0

2.1

1.9

2.1

Odessa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86,853

87,734

86,910

87,863

2,057

2,369

2,043

2,522

2.4

2.7

2.4

2.9

San Angelo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,893

56,220

56,098

56,278

1,683

1,611

1,692

1,634

3.0

2.9

3.0

2.9

San Antonio-New Braunfels. . . . . . . . . . . .

1,191,437

1,226,439

1,196,835

1,230,340

37,225

35,679

36,813

35,968

3.1

2.9

3.1

2.9

Sherman-Denison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,863

64,870

64,302

65,221

1,942

1,877

1,923

1,921

3.0

2.9

3.0

2.9

Texarkana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65,123

64,953

65,391

65,217

3,149

2,584

3,065

2,568

4.8

4.0

4.7

3.9

Tyler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

108,396

108,909

108,817

109,526

3,797

3,412

3,743

3,483

3.5

3.1

3.4

3.2

Victoria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,701

46,310

47,058

46,679

1,597

1,527

1,610

1,639

3.4

3.3

3.4

3.5

Waco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

125,360

126,507

125,969

127,299

4,108

3,944

4,095

3,944

3.3

3.1

3.3

3.1

Wichita Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65,741

65,935

66,105

66,229

2,029

1,928

2,060

1,942

3.1

2.9

3.1

2.9

Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,581,739

1,620,475

1,584,804

1,633,726

45,535

29,957

44,023

30,819

2.9

1.8

2.8

1.9

Logan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71,851

73,373

71,918

73,570

1,715

1,117

1,692

1,126

2.4

1.5

2.4

1.5

Ogden-Clearfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

327,041

337,431

327,254

339,781

9,649

6,085

9,180

6,252

3.0

1.8

2.8

1.8

Provo-Orem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

310,095

318,181

310,416

321,523

8,153

5,392

7,738

5,438

2.6

1.7

2.5

1.7

St. George. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75,372

77,507

75,364

78,100

2,337

1,600

2,322

1,649

3.1

2.1

3.1

2.1

Salt Lake City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

655,548

668,907

658,694

675,387

18,720

12,439

18,030

12,706

2.9

1.9

2.7

1.9

Vermont. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

344,338

339,228

344,435

339,907

6,419

5,434

8,218

7,328

1.9

1.6

2.4

2.2

Burlington-South Burlington. . . . . . . . . . . .

125,505

126,186

125,252

125,995

2,050

1,689

2,489

2,235

1.6

1.3

2.0

1.8

Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,332,241

4,444,585

4,319,915

4,442,397

115,281

106,915

108,524

109,049

2.7

2.4

2.5

2.5

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford. . . . .

90,553

89,414

90,375

92,206

2,479

2,300

2,409

2,366

2.7

2.6

2.7

2.6

Charlottesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

119,483

122,880

119,530

122,957

2,917

2,619

2,752

2,718

2.4

2.1

2.3

2.2

Harrisonburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,412

68,771

66,543

68,337

1,732

1,485

1,659

1,526

2.6

2.2

2.5

2.2

Lynchburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

122,491

125,865

122,469

125,143

3,632

3,449

3,433

3,542

3.0

2.7

2.8

2.8

Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

676,836

693,313

673,149

694,760

19,220

17,831

17,975

18,041

2.8

2.6

2.7

2.6

Roanoke. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

156,853

161,738

155,643

161,305

4,071

3,915

3,808

4,018

2.6

2.4

2.4

2.5

Staunton-Waynesboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59,746

61,615

59,718

61,415

1,506

1,389

1,410

1,379

2.5

2.3

2.4

2.2

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News. . .

845,987

863,369

840,941

860,647

25,012

23,350

23,747

23,611

3.0

2.7

2.8

2.7

Winchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72,448

75,367

72,119

75,032

1,868

1,706

1,768

1,749

2.6

2.3

2.5

2.3

Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,829,284

3,959,290

3,828,288

3,971,745

156,123

159,682

169,864

157,780

4.1

4.0

4.4

4.0

Bellingham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113,257

118,133

114,478

118,627

4,834

5,732

5,228

5,887

4.3

4.9

4.6

5.0

Bremerton-Silverdale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124,369

130,523

125,449

132,292

5,309

5,797

5,586

5,756

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.4

Kennewick-Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141,665

148,341

140,632

147,318

6,416

7,176

7,326

7,964

4.5

4.8

5.2

5.4

Longview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,206

47,907

46,663

48,468

2,435

2,831

2,621

2,864

5.3

5.9

5.6

5.9

Mount Vernon-Anacortes. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61,595

63,716

61,408

63,905

2,895

3,344

3,085

3,526

4.7

5.2

5.0

5.5

Olympia-Tumwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

139,676

146,659

140,936

148,329

6,002

6,978

6,477

7,034

4.3

4.8

4.6

4.7

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,117,874

2,188,523

2,127,070

2,203,712

77,856

71,157

83,265

63,848

3.7

3.3

3.9

2.9

Spokane-Spokane Valley. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

271,270

283,806

274,118

285,890

12,474

13,913

13,546

14,475

4.6

4.9

4.9

5.1

Walla Walla. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

32,843

33,816

32,513

33,723

1,318

1,512

1,407

1,529

4.0

4.5

4.3

4.5

Wenatchee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69,274

70,064

64,855

67,083

2,662

2,920

3,166

3,457

3.8

4.2

4.9

5.2

Yakima. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

134,495

136,906

126,242

129,077

6,590

7,249

8,394

9,111

4.9

5.3

6.6

7.1

West Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

788,391

810,483

781,723

803,798

35,784

36,518

35,750

38,960

4.5

4.5

4.6

4.8

Beckley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45,610

46,930

44,627

46,080

2,227

2,188

2,310

2,397

4.9

4.7

5.2

5.2

Charleston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92,340

93,983

91,279

93,361

4,409

4,173

4,333

4,430

4.8

4.4

4.7

4.7

Huntington-Ashland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145,452

147,127

144,570

146,846

7,014

6,695

6,752

6,806

4.8

4.6

4.7

4.6

Morgantown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69,548

70,594

68,955

70,202

2,724

2,467

2,621

2,557

3.9

3.5

3.8

3.6

Parkersburg-Vienna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37,962

39,217

37,726

39,002

1,814

1,930

1,847

2,064

4.8

4.9

4.9

5.3

Wheeling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67,715

69,393

67,457

69,066

2,885

3,588

2,845

3,765

4.3

5.2

4.2

5.5

Wisconsin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,121,149

3,112,283

3,116,247

3,102,020

74,734

85,913

77,545

90,771

2.4

2.8

2.5

2.9

Appleton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130,174

129,077

130,308

128,992

2,863

3,101

2,912

3,232

2.2

2.4

2.2

2.5

See footnotes at end of table.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area - Continued

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State and area

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Wisconsin - Continued

Eau Claire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92,637

92,378

92,945

91,782

2,035

2,366

2,102

2,467

2.2

2.6

2.3

2.7

Fond du Lac. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57,705

56,922

57,564

56,714

1,180

1,401

1,185

1,397

2.0

2.5

2.1

2.5

Green Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

175,833

176,186

176,011

175,631

3,879

4,505

3,910

4,718

2.2

2.6

2.2

2.7

Janesville-Beloit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

84,514

85,428

85,503

85,804

2,154

2,723

2,837

2,926

2.5

3.2

3.3

3.4

La Crosse-Onalaska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,662

78,490

77,926

78,626

1,588

1,784

1,606

1,838

2.0

2.3

2.1

2.3

Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

386,487

387,071

387,637

387,083

7,515

8,329

7,445

8,512

1.9

2.2

1.9

2.2

Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis. . . . . . .

822,019

824,356

819,065

823,180

22,348

25,671

22,596

26,353

2.7

3.1

2.8

3.2

Oshkosh-Neenah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92,273

91,911

92,209

91,918

2,068

2,382

2,040

2,440

2.2

2.6

2.2

2.7

Racine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98,681

98,417

98,565

97,942

2,876

3,507

2,909

3,628

2.9

3.6

3.0

3.7

Sheboygan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62,531

62,688

62,262

62,184

1,290

1,497

1,325

1,591

2.1

2.4

2.1

2.6

Wausau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73,579

73,555

73,764

73,394

1,560

1,777

1,539

1,813

2.1

2.4

2.1

2.5

Wyoming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

289,628

293,236

289,088

294,329

10,831

9,580

11,587

10,524

3.7

3.3

4.0

3.6

Casper. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39,013

39,291

39,147

39,687

1,734

1,447

1,719

1,535

4.4

3.7

4.4

3.9

Cheyenne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47,340

48,206

47,773

48,555

1,756

1,577

1,784

1,609

3.7

3.3

3.7

3.3

Puerto Rico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,073,873

1,062,590

1,066,244

1,045,943

89,194

95,462

81,077

88,581

8.3

9.0

7.6

8.5

Aguadilla-Isabela. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

85,162

84,837

84,842

83,974

9,152

9,449

8,957

9,397

10.7

11.1

10.6

11.2

Arecibo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,993

51,877

51,890

51,775

5,188

5,569

5,164

5,788

10.0

10.7

10.0

11.2

Guayama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19,683

19,492

19,563

19,196

2,449

2,613

2,323

2,514

12.4

13.4

11.9

13.1

Mayaguez. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27,591

27,224

27,275

26,791

2,860

2,829

2,602

2,569

10.4

10.4

9.5

9.6

Ponce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90,008

90,075

89,586

88,494

9,685

11,141

9,045

10,277

10.8

12.4

10.1

11.6

San German. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34,846

35,064

34,563

34,250

3,679

3,868

3,364

3,431

10.6

11.0

9.7

10.0

San Juan-Carolina-Caguas. . . . . . . . . . . .

724,383

712,737

718,434

700,669

51,263

54,495

45,152

49,384

7.1

7.6

6.3

7.0

  • For operational reasons, these interstate areas are listed under the state that accounts for the larger share of the population, which is different from the state that contains the first principal city.
    2 The area boundary does not reflect the Office of Management and Budget delineation. p Preliminary

NOTE: Data refer to place of residence. Data for Puerto Rico are derived from a monthly household survey similar to the Current Population Survey. Area delineations are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18-03, dated April 10, 2018, and are available on the BLS website at https://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs), while areas in other states are county-based. Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. They are listed under the state containing the first principal city, unless otherwise footnoted. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month.

LABOR FORCE DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 2. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state, selected metropolitan area, and metropolitan division1

Civilian labor force

Unemployed

October

November

Number

Percent of labor force

State, area, and division

2018

2019

2018

2019p

October

November

October

November

2018

2019

2018

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

California. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19,542,699

19,588,210

19,562,413

19,616,666

772,789

719,195

760,287

719,250

4.0

3.7

3.9

3.7

Los Angeles-LongBeach-Anaheim. . .

6,806,284

6,797,275

6,817,785

6,833,846

286,727

275,353

278,806

261,949

4.2

4.1

4.1

3.8

Anaheim-SantaAna-Irvine. . . . . . . . .

1,640,925

1,634,233

1,642,110

1,630,091

46,639

41,319

44,401

41,329

2.8

2.5

2.7

2.5

Los Angeles-Long

Beach-Glendale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,165,359

5,163,042

5,175,675

5,203,755

240,088

234,034

234,405

220,620

4.6

4.5

4.5

4.2

San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. . . . .

2,608,606

2,633,310

2,617,117

2,630,977

68,309

61,088

65,402

60,963

2.6

2.3

2.5

2.3

Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley. . . . . . . .

1,422,748

1,431,158

1,427,522

1,428,832

42,054

38,052

40,455

37,939

3.0

2.7

2.8

2.7

San Francisco-RedwoodCity-South

San Francisco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,042,990

1,058,898

1,047,093

1,058,897

22,890

20,154

21,770

20,150

2.2

1.9

2.1

1.9

San Rafael. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142,868

143,254

142,502

143,248

3,365

2,882

3,177

2,874

2.4

2.0

2.2

2.0

District of Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

402,446

408,339

402,811

415,088

21,315

21,835

20,563

20,558

5.3

5.3

5.1

5.0

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria2. . . .

3,393,284

3,487,666

3,385,124

3,492,075

104,742

98,416

98,787

96,779

3.1

2.8

2.9

2.8

Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville3.. .

686,453

703,794

683,897

702,944

20,991

19,261

19,785

18,662

3.1

2.7

2.9

2.7

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria2.. .

2,706,831

2,783,872

2,701,227

2,789,131

83,751

79,155

79,002

78,117

3.1

2.8

2.9

2.8

Florida. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,305,265

10,566,507

10,293,133

10,479,146

340,078

307,598

335,916

287,779

3.3

2.9

3.3

2.7

Miami-FortLauderdale-West Palm

Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,163,808

3,270,402

3,168,158

3,221,968

107,396

94,652

101,211

87,410

3.4

2.9

3.2

2.7

Fort Lauderdale-Pompano

Beach-Deerfield Beach. . . . . . . . .

1,047,301

1,061,181

1,042,740

1,052,094

32,321

29,630

31,944

27,798

3.1

2.8

3.1

2.6

Miami-MiamiBeach-Kendall. . . . . . .

1,381,547

1,463,774

1,386,673

1,430,295

50,415

42,518

45,184

38,784

3.6

2.9

3.3

2.7

West Palm Beach-Boca

Raton-Delray Beach. . . . . . . . . . . .

734,960

745,447

738,745

739,579

24,660

22,504

24,083

20,828

3.4

3.0

3.3

2.8

Illinois. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,477,162

6,487,355

6,468,774

6,447,310

263,231

235,472

259,018

218,259

4.1

3.6

4.0

3.4

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin2. . . . . . . . . . .

4,877,420

4,873,069

4,873,710

4,852,539

182,549

168,980

172,179

158,665

3.7

3.5

3.5

3.3

Chicago-Naperville-Arlington

Heights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,732,976

3,720,732

3,728,038

3,708,631

134,188

126,805

123,652

116,753

3.6

3.4

3.3

3.1

Elgin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

331,020

333,596

332,238

331,472

15,104

12,439

15,572

11,806

4.6

3.7

4.7

3.6

Gary3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343,807

344,027

343,936

342,379

14,617

13,237

14,265

14,211

4.3

3.8

4.1

4.2

Lake County-Kenosha County2. . . .

469,617

474,714

469,498

470,057

18,640

16,499

18,690

15,895

4.0

3.5

4.0

3.4

Massachusetts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,817,350

3,840,687

3,823,218

3,837,116

104,354

94,594

98,823

88,675

2.7

2.5

2.6

2.3

Boston-Cambridge-Nashua2. . . . . . . . .

2,821,289

2,844,515

2,827,796

2,844,941

71,261

65,300

66,984

60,618

2.5

2.3

2.4

2.1

Boston-Cambridge-Newton. . . . . . . .

1,686,619

1,702,151

1,689,324

1,701,821

40,597

36,388

37,737

33,467

2.4

2.1

2.2

2.0

Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton. . . . . .

111,814

112,400

112,319

112,892

3,446

3,064

3,179

2,835

3.1

2.7

2.8

2.5

Framingham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

163,791

164,064

163,941

163,997

3,837

3,422

3,504

3,088

2.3

2.1

2.1

1.9

Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury

Town2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117,900

118,993

118,090

119,156

3,037

2,961

2,999

2,857

2.6

2.5

2.5

2.4

Lawrence-MethuenTown-Salem2. . .

99,233

98,628

99,127

98,359

3,652

3,389

3,432

3,165

3.7

3.4

3.5

3.2

Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford2. . . . . . .

197,969

199,077

198,295

198,871

5,316

4,895

5,023

4,613

2.7

2.5

2.5

2.3

Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead. . . . . . . . .

87,157

88,031

87,547

87,892

2,468

2,230

2,254

2,024

2.8

2.5

2.6

2.3

Nashua2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173,942

177,318

175,641

177,932

3,934

4,416

4,186

4,416

2.3

2.5

2.4

2.5

Peabody-Salem-Beverly. . . . . . . . . . .

95,224

96,170

95,400

95,905

2,468

2,214

2,297

2,010

2.6

2.3

2.4

2.1

Taunton-Middleborough-Norton. . . .

87,640

87,683

88,112

88,116

2,506

2,321

2,373

2,143

2.9

2.6

2.7

2.4

Michigan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,909,341

4,938,576

4,893,580

4,934,862

181,296

174,052

166,773

157,495

3.7

3.5

3.4

3.2

Detroit-Warren-Dearborn. . . . . . . . . . . .

2,149,643

2,175,085

2,129,400

2,148,174

93,159

81,502

78,916

72,550

4.3

3.7

3.7

3.4

Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia. . . . . . . . . .

802,052

809,113

793,199

799,899

43,101

36,365

35,833

32,284

5.4

4.5

4.5

4.0

Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills. . . . . .

1,347,592

1,365,973

1,336,201

1,348,277

50,059

45,137

43,083

40,267

3.7

3.3

3.2

3.0

New York. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,603,222

9,583,705

9,576,358

9,511,374

347,452

373,274

339,417

345,862

3.6

3.9

3.5

3.6

New York-Newark-Jersey City2. . . . . .

9,937,952

10,027,732

9,916,030

9,978,678

356,047

368,011

337,329

342,886

3.6

3.7

3.4

3.4

Dutchess County-Putnam County. . .

196,208

196,247

196,123

196,175

6,237

6,968

6,005

6,429

3.2

3.6

3.1

3.3

Nassau County-Suffolk County. . . . .

1,487,221

1,489,807

1,481,455

1,484,057

46,447

51,485

45,686

48,512

3.1

3.5

3.1

3.3

Newark3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,214,580

1,258,990

1,213,853

1,259,965

43,587

42,490

40,270

41,877

3.6

3.4

3.3

3.3

New York-JerseyCity-White

Plains2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,039,943

7,082,688

7,024,599

7,038,481

259,776

267,068

245,368

246,068

3.7

3.8

3.5

3.5

Pennsylvania. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,444,551

6,570,222

6,437,401

6,542,425

248,016

285,827

233,777

278,771

3.8

4.4

3.6

4.3

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington2. . . .

3,096,866

3,173,357

3,093,266

3,164,985

118,481

131,058

109,302

125,591

3.8

4.1

3.5

4.0

Camden3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

623,232

640,110

623,304

638,974

22,455

22,072

21,276

21,975

3.6

3.4

3.4

3.4

Montgomery County-Bucks

County-Chester County. . . . . . . . .

1,077,100

1,101,242

1,074,776

1,092,875

34,724

39,682

31,958

37,513

3.2

3.6

3.0

3.4

Philadelphia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,016,468

1,042,606

1,013,168

1,040,404

48,114

54,571

44,307

52,092

4.7

5.2

4.4

5.0

Wilmington3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

380,066

389,399

382,018

392,732

13,188

14,733

11,761

14,011

3.5

3.8

3.1

3.6

Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13,901,088

14,190,783

13,961,940

14,265,562

489,204

467,680

485,960

477,021

3.5

3.3

3.5

3.3

Dallas-FortWorth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . .

3,928,885

4,030,421

3,948,427

4,061,740

128,366

123,844

126,608

123,322

3.3

3.1

3.2

3.0

Dallas-Plano-Irving. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,650,889

2,732,133

2,665,536

2,751,122

86,951

82,489

85,627

82,931

3.3

3.0

3.2

3.0

Fort Worth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,277,996

1,298,288

1,282,891

1,310,618

41,415

41,355

40,981

40,391

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.1

Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,829,284

3,959,290

3,828,288

3,971,745

156,123

159,682

169,864

157,780

4.1

4.0

4.4

4.0

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. . . . . . . . . . . .

2,117,874

2,188,523

2,127,070

2,203,712

77,856

71,157

83,265

63,848

3.7

3.3

3.9

2.9

Seattle-Bellevue-Everett. . . . . . . . . . .

1,688,061

1,738,839

1,693,502

1,749,705

57,768

48,394

61,951

40,729

3.4

2.8

3.7

2.3

Tacoma-Lakewood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

429,813

449,684

433,568

454,007

20,088

22,763

21,314

23,119

4.7

5.1

4.9

5.1

  • These 11 areas contain all of the 38 metropolitan divisions.
  • Part of the area (or division) is in one or more adjacent states.
    3 All of the division is in one or more adjacent states. p Preliminary
    NOTE: Data refer to place of residence. Area delineations are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18-03, dated April 10, 2018, and are available on the BLS website at https://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs), while areas in other states are county-based.Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. They are listed under the state containing the first principal city. Metropolitan divisions are listed under their metropolitan areas. Some divisions lie in more than one state, and some, like Camden, NJ, are totally outside the states under which their metropolitan areas are listed. For Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV,the metropolitan area and division titles are identical. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

Alabama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,059.9

2,105.7

2,064.4

2,114.8

50.4

2.4

Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46.8

47.4

47.2

47.5

0.3

0.6

Auburn-Opelika. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66.9

68.8

67.3

69.3

2.0

3.0

Birmingham-Hoover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

541.9

551.3

544.1

553.6

9.5

1.7

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76.5

79.4

76.5

79.4

2.9

3.8

Decatur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56.5

57.5

56.8

58.0

1.2

2.1

Dothan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58.9

59.3

58.8

59.6

0.8

1.4

Florence-Muscle Shoals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57.6

58.2

57.9

58.3

0.4

0.7

Gadsden. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38.4

38.9

38.2

39.1

0.9

2.4

Huntsville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

240.5

247.2

242.3

248.1

5.8

2.4

Mobile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

186.3

189.1

186.7

189.7

3.0

1.6

Montgomery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

176.6

179.9

177.2

180.1

2.9

1.6

Tuscaloosa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

112.0

114.7

111.9

114.7

2.8

2.5

Alaska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

323.6

323.5

313.8

314.9

1.1

0.4

Anchorage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

175.8

175.4

173.4

174.6

1.2

0.7

Fairbanks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37.9

37.6

36.7

36.8

0.1

0.3

Arizona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,903.6

2,974.0

2,936.5

3,008.2

71.7

2.4

Flagstaff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.0

70.4

69.0

70.0

1.0

1.4

Lake Havasu City-Kingman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52.0

53.1

52.2

53.8

1.6

3.1

Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,145.1

2,203.0

2,169.3

2,225.8

56.5

2.6

Prescott. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66.4

67.3

67.0

67.8

0.8

1.2

Sierra Vista-Douglas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33.4

34.4

34.1

34.6

0.5

1.5

Tucson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

387.2

393.8

391.7

398.3

6.6

1.7

Yuma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56.8

56.8

58.3

57.8

-0.5

-0.9

Arkansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,273.2

1,291.8

1,276.7

1,292.3

15.6

1.2

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

261.1

271.3

262.5

271.9

9.4

3.6

Fort Smith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113.8

113.5

114.4

114.2

-0.2

-0.2

Hot Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38.8

39.3

38.7

39.2

0.5

1.3

Jonesboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59.1

60.6

59.4

61.0

1.6

2.7

Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

364.7

368.3

366.0

369.5

3.5

1.0

Pine Bluff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33.6

33.1

33.6

33.0

-0.6

-1.8

California. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,344.3

17,660.6

17,440.7

17,766.9

326.2

1.9

Bakersfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

270.3

275.8

272.6

278.4

5.8

2.1

Chico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

84.8

86.0

84.5

86.0

1.5

1.8

El Centro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52.1

53.1

53.3

53.8

0.5

0.9

Fresno. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

358.3

367.7

361.7

369.3

7.6

2.1

Hanford-Corcoran. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.3

41.7

41.1

41.8

0.7

1.7

Los Angeles-LongBeach-Anaheim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,217.4

6,302.2

6,247.2

6,343.2

96.0

1.5

Madera. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39.2

40.1

39.2

40.1

0.9

2.3

Merced. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.1

72.9

68.8

72.1

3.3

4.8

Modesto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

179.4

182.5

179.2

182.7

3.5

2.0

Napa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75.9

76.7

74.9

75.9

1.0

1.3

Oxnard-ThousandOaks-Ventura. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

310.3

313.2

312.5

315.2

2.7

0.9

Redding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67.7

68.8

67.4

68.8

1.4

2.1

Riverside-SanBernardino-Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,518.8

1,550.6

1,538.9

1,571.9

33.0

2.1

Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,009.4

1,024.8

1,017.0

1,033.5

16.5

1.6

Salinas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145.7

150.1

146.2

150.9

4.7

3.2

San Diego-Carlsbad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,495.4

1,528.0

1,503.8

1,538.1

34.3

2.3

San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,461.0

2,528.0

2,479.2

2,538.7

59.5

2.4

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,132.9

1,166.1

1,141.9

1,174.4

32.5

2.8

San Luis Obispo-PasoRobles-Arroyo Grande. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

119.5

121.5

120.2

122.3

2.1

1.7

Santa Cruz-Watsonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104.4

105.9

103.9

105.6

1.7

1.6

Santa Maria-Santa Barbara. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

186.0

190.0

187.4

191.0

3.6

1.9

Santa Rosa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

211.2

213.9

209.7

213.4

3.7

1.8

Stockton-Lodi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

245.4

244.6

245.6

246.1

0.5

0.2

Vallejo-Fairfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142.2

142.5

142.6

143.0

0.4

0.3

Visalia-Porterville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

126.9

130.2

128.9

130.6

1.7

1.3

Yuba City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45.1

45.9

45.4

47.2

1.8

4.0

Colorado. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,744.8

2,798.6

2,750.4

2,808.5

58.1

2.1

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

Colorado - Continued

Boulder. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

197.4

202.4

198.5

202.9

4.4

2.2

Colorado Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

297.1

305.4

297.2

307.2

10.0

3.4

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,513.5

1,544.1

1,510.1

1,546.0

35.9

2.4

Fort Collins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

172.3

178.1

173.4

178.6

5.2

3.0

Grand Junction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65.3

66.7

65.7

66.4

0.7

1.1

Greeley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

112.0

114.6

110.4

114.2

3.8

3.4

Pueblo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62.9

63.2

62.9

63.7

0.8

1.3

Connecticut. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,704.3

1,709.8

1,714.2

1,717.7

3.5

0.2

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

408.9

412.5

413.0

413.4

0.4

0.1

Danbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77.9

78.1

78.6

78.7

0.1

0.1

Hartford-WestHartford-East Hartford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

588.4

586.6

591.8

589.6

-2.2

-0.4

New Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

290.6

292.7

290.7

292.5

1.8

0.6

Norwich-NewLondon-Westerly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129.9

130.1

130.3

130.6

0.3

0.2

Waterbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69.3

69.9

69.9

70.3

0.4

0.6

Delaware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

464.1

471.4

466.6

473.7

7.1

1.5

Dover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.0

71.3

70.3

71.5

1.2

1.7

Salisbury1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

161.7

161.8

159.9

159.9

0.0

0.0

District of Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

797.6

805.1

795.4

807.9

12.5

1.6

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,313.2

3,363.7

3,323.8

3,384.9

61.1

1.8

Florida. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,855.3

9,089.2

8,954.8

9,174.8

220.0

2.5

Cape Coral-Fort Myers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

272.1

283.2

278.2

287.4

9.2

3.3

Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

115.2

119.0

115.9

118.9

3.0

2.6

Deltona-DaytonaBeach-Ormond Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

205.4

207.3

206.5

209.7

3.2

1.5

Gainesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

148.1

149.0

148.6

150.0

1.4

0.9

Homosassa Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33.8

34.3

34.0

34.4

0.4

1.2

Jacksonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

710.2

735.0

713.7

738.1

24.4

3.4

Lakeland-Winter Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

232.6

234.6

234.0

237.9

3.9

1.7

Miami-FortLauderdale-West Palm Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,705.6

2,755.3

2,735.0

2,775.1

40.1

1.5

Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150.7

155.3

153.8

159.7

5.9

3.8

North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

307.3

312.8

310.6

318.6

8.0

2.6

Ocala. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

105.5

108.2

106.2

108.9

2.7

2.5

Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,311.9

1,354.9

1,328.2

1,364.9

36.7

2.8

Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

225.6

233.0

227.4

235.1

7.7

3.4

Panama City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

84.6

83.8

83.0

83.4

0.4

0.5

Pensacola-FerryPass-Brent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

184.0

185.1

185.1

186.5

1.4

0.8

Port St. Lucie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

154.1

157.4

156.1

159.0

2.9

1.9

Punta Gorda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49.0

50.4

49.6

51.6

2.0

4.0

Sebastian-Vero Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53.5

55.4

54.9

56.9

2.0

3.6

Sebring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25.6

26.0

26.1

26.6

0.5

1.9

Tallahassee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

187.4

193.0

189.4

194.4

5.0

2.6

Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,363.8

1,394.3

1,373.9

1,404.7

30.8

2.2

The Villages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29.9

30.8

30.2

31.3

1.1

3.6

Georgia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,588.2

4,659.7

4,611.1

4,680.8

69.7

1.5

Albany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63.3

63.4

63.8

63.7

-0.1

-0.2

Athens-Clarke County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100.8

101.6

101.5

101.9

0.4

0.4

Atlanta-SandySprings-Roswell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,815.7

2,873.5

2,826.7

2,887.9

61.2

2.2

Augusta-Richmond County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

241.9

244.6

242.7

246.6

3.9

1.6

Brunswick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44.8

45.7

45.1

45.9

0.8

1.8

Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

123.4

123.1

124.3

123.8

-0.5

-0.4

Dalton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68.4

69.2

68.5

69.0

0.5

0.7

Gainesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94.8

98.0

95.2

98.6

3.4

3.6

Hinesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20.8

21.1

20.8

21.1

0.3

1.4

Macon-Bibb County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103.5

104.4

104.6

105.4

0.8

0.8

Rome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.8

42.9

41.9

43.1

1.2

2.9

Savannah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

184.6

186.4

185.2

188.3

3.1

1.7

Valdosta. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56.9

57.8

57.3

58.1

0.8

1.4

Warner Robins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76.3

77.4

76.6

77.7

1.1

1.4

Hawaii. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

658.7

664.5

664.8

669.1

4.3

0.6

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

Hawaii - Continued

Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76.7

78.0

77.3

78.4

1.1

1.4

Urban Honolulu. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

481.2

485.6

485.0

489.7

4.7

1.0

Idaho. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

748.5

765.1

745.0

764.7

19.7

2.6

Boise City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

336.7

345.1

337.2

346.7

9.5

2.8

Coeur d'Alene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66.2

67.8

65.5

66.5

1.0

1.5

Idaho Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69.0

71.6

69.2

72.3

3.1

4.5

Lewiston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28.7

29.4

28.8

29.3

0.5

1.7

Pocatello. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37.2

38.3

37.2

38.4

1.2

3.2

Twin Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47.2

48.1

46.9

47.7

0.8

1.7

Illinois. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,197.8

6,262.2

6,205.9

6,243.4

37.5

0.6

Bloomington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93.6

93.9

93.5

93.5

0.0

0.0

Carbondale-Marion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59.6

61.1

59.8

61.3

1.5

2.5

Champaign-Urbana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

112.9

116.9

112.6

116.4

3.8

3.4

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,806.1

4,860.4

4,820.0

4,848.6

28.6

0.6

Danville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27.8

27.8

27.8

27.7

-0.1

-0.4

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188.4

187.9

189.2

186.9

-2.3

-1.2

Decatur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52.3

53.0

52.3

53.1

0.8

1.5

Kankakee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46.8

47.6

47.2

47.3

0.1

0.2

Peoria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

177.8

176.8

178.2

175.1

-3.1

-1.7

Rockford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

154.4

155.4

155.0

154.6

-0.4

-0.3

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

115.2

116.6

115.5

116.5

1.0

0.9

Indiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,177.3

3,192.6

3,188.6

3,196.8

8.2

0.3

Bloomington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79.9

80.1

80.6

80.5

-0.1

-0.1

Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53.9

54.9

54.4

55.0

0.6

1.1

Elkhart-Goshen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

143.0

143.6

142.9

144.0

1.1

0.8

Evansville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

165.1

165.5

166.1

165.8

-0.3

-0.2

Fort Wayne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

228.4

228.8

228.4

231.2

2.8

1.2

Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,081.6

1,089.4

1,084.3

1,090.9

6.6

0.6

Kokomo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.1

41.9

41.7

42.0

0.3

0.7

Lafayette-West Lafayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

107.7

105.4

107.5

105.2

-2.3

-2.1

Michigan City-La Porte. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.4

41.5

41.8

41.6

-0.2

-0.5

Muncie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51.8

52.1

51.9

52.6

0.7

1.3

South Bend-Mishawaka. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145.7

146.2

146.1

146.0

-0.1

-0.1

Terre Haute. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71.4

71.5

71.7

71.8

0.1

0.1

Iowa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,603.5

1,613.2

1,606.7

1,612.6

5.9

0.4

Ames. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56.0

57.3

56.1

57.3

1.2

2.1

Cedar Rapids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145.2

146.2

145.8

147.5

1.7

1.2

Des Moines-West Des Moines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

374.3

384.6

375.7

383.8

8.1

2.2

Dubuque. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61.6

61.9

61.8

62.3

0.5

0.8

Iowa City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102.1

101.2

102.3

101.3

-1.0

-1.0

Sioux City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90.7

90.5

90.9

91.2

0.3

0.3

Waterloo-Cedar Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93.0

92.7

93.3

92.4

-0.9

-1.0

Kansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,434.1

1,453.7

1,440.3

1,457.8

17.5

1.2

Lawrence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55.0

55.3

55.1

55.4

0.3

0.5

Manhattan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44.6

44.8

44.8

44.7

-0.1

-0.2

Topeka. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113.2

116.4

113.2

115.8

2.6

2.3

Wichita. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

301.8

304.6

303.6

306.1

2.5

0.8

Kentucky. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,940.5

1,973.8

1,959.1

1,983.8

24.7

1.3

Bowling Green. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77.0

77.9

77.8

78.9

1.1

1.4

Elizabethtown-Fort Knox. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57.0

57.4

57.5

57.6

0.1

0.2

Lexington-Fayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

278.6

285.5

281.4

285.8

4.4

1.6

Louisville/Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

668.5

681.2

676.0

684.9

8.9

1.3

Owensboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54.1

54.3

54.1

54.2

0.1

0.2

Louisiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,998.2

2,000.5

2,001.7

2,011.0

9.3

0.5

Alexandria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61.5

61.3

61.4

61.5

0.1

0.2

Baton Rouge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

412.6

417.2

415.1

419.9

4.8

1.2

Hammond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45.9

46.9

45.9

47.2

1.3

2.8

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

Louisiana - Continued

Houma-Thibodaux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86.3

84.7

86.1

84.5

-1.6

-1.9

Lafayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

204.5

205.9

204.9

205.5

0.6

0.3

Lake Charles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

118.9

119.1

118.9

118.2

-0.7

-0.6

Monroe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78.8

78.0

79.2

78.9

-0.3

-0.4

New Orleans-Metairie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

584.4

592.8

585.6

599.9

14.3

2.4

Shreveport-Bossier City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

180.8

179.4

181.1

181.0

-0.1

-0.1

Maine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

634.7

640.7

628.7

633.1

4.4

0.7

Bangor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68.7

69.1

68.4

69.0

0.6

0.9

Lewiston-Auburn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51.8

51.8

51.3

51.6

0.3

0.6

Portland-South Portland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

210.7

212.6

210.6

211.2

0.6

0.3

Maryland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,758.7

2,786.8

2,771.2

2,802.6

31.4

1.1

Baltimore-Columbia-Towson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,424.6

1,447.7

1,433.3

1,456.9

23.6

1.6

California-Lexington Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46.0

46.5

46.1

46.6

0.5

1.1

Cumberland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39.7

39.7

39.9

39.7

-0.2

-0.5

Hagerstown-Martinsburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106.5

108.7

108.5

111.3

2.8

2.6

Massachusetts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,679.6

3,730.4

3,678.0

3,727.3

49.3

1.3

Barnstable Town. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106.8

108.2

103.8

104.1

0.3

0.3

Boston-Cambridge-Nashua. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,793.9

2,834.9

2,796.5

2,835.5

39.0

1.4

Leominster-Gardner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55.1

55.7

55.6

56.4

0.8

1.4

New Bedford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67.4

67.8

67.9

68.2

0.3

0.4

Pittsfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.0

41.4

41.0

41.3

0.3

0.7

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343.6

351.6

344.5

352.7

8.2

2.4

Worcester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

288.8

288.9

290.5

289.6

-0.9

-0.3

Michigan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,470.2

4,465.4

4,468.3

4,485.7

17.4

0.4

Ann Arbor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

227.2

230.2

228.0

231.1

3.1

1.4

Battle Creek. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58.8

58.4

59.1

58.7

-0.4

-0.7

Bay City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35.8

34.9

35.8

35.1

-0.7

-2.0

Detroit-Warren-Dearborn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,050.9

2,041.8

2,052.7

2,046.1

-6.6

-0.3

Flint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142.8

137.9

143.1

145.1

2.0

1.4

Grand Rapids-Wyoming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

568.0

569.1

570.0

568.7

-1.3

-0.2

Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59.2

58.8

59.2

59.2

0.0

0.0

Kalamazoo-Portage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

152.1

152.9

152.0

152.6

0.6

0.4

Lansing-East Lansing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

241.5

240.4

241.6

244.9

3.3

1.4

Midland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38.1

37.8

38.0

38.0

0.0

0.0

Monroe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42.8

42.7

42.6

42.8

0.2

0.5

Muskegon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65.5

66.8

65.9

67.0

1.1

1.7

Niles-Benton Harbor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62.6

63.7

62.5

63.6

1.1

1.8

Saginaw. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88.6

86.8

89.5

88.9

-0.6

-0.7

Minnesota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,987.0

2,996.1

2,975.9

2,981.8

5.9

0.2

Duluth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

138.6

139.5

138.6

138.4

-0.2

-0.1

Mankato-North Mankato. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

60.3

60.9

59.6

61.1

1.5

2.5

Minneapolis-St.Paul-Bloomington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,031.1

2,029.3

2,027.4

2,021.3

-6.1

-0.3

Rochester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

123.7

124.9

122.7

124.0

1.3

1.1

St. Cloud. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

112.0

113.1

111.5

112.4

0.9

0.8

Mississippi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,165.8

1,177.8

1,173.6

1,181.3

7.7

0.7

Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

155.1

158.9

155.7

159.9

4.2

2.7

Hattiesburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66.6

68.4

67.4

69.3

1.9

2.8

Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

282.1

285.3

283.0

285.5

2.5

0.9

Missouri. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,912.9

2,944.1

2,911.5

2,948.3

36.8

1.3

Cape Girardeau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45.5

46.0

45.8

46.1

0.3

0.7

Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102.0

102.3

102.1

102.3

0.2

0.2

Jefferson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77.2

77.6

76.9

77.9

1.0

1.3

Joplin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

81.8

82.2

82.2

82.6

0.4

0.5

Kansas City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,109.4

1,124.6

1,110.8

1,126.9

16.1

1.4

St. Joseph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63.4

63.2

63.4

63.1

-0.3

-0.5

St. Louis2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,396.8

1,421.4

1,399.6

1,421.5

21.9

1.6

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

217.9

219.7

220.0

221.1

1.1

0.5

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

Montana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

481.9

488.0

478.7

485.7

7.0

1.5

Billings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

85.3

85.9

84.9

85.4

0.5

0.6

Great Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36.1

36.3

36.1

36.3

0.2

0.6

Missoula. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63.5

65.0

62.9

64.2

1.3

2.1

Nebraska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,028.3

1,043.7

1,031.0

1,045.6

14.6

1.4

Grand Island. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42.2

42.6

42.2

42.3

0.1

0.2

Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

192.9

194.0

193.2

196.3

3.1

1.6

Omaha-Council Bluffs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

505.7

522.8

508.4

523.6

15.2

3.0

Nevada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,413.5

1,445.8

1,416.8

1,454.7

37.9

2.7

Carson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30.5

31.6

30.5

31.5

1.0

3.3

Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,026.1

1,043.1

1,023.0

1,052.2

29.2

2.9

Reno. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

251.2

262.2

254.5

264.5

10.0

3.9

New Hampshire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

687.5

694.4

686.7

690.6

3.9

0.6

Dover-Durham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54.8

55.2

55.2

54.9

-0.3

-0.5

Manchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116.0

116.8

116.0

117.4

1.4

1.2

Portsmouth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94.8

95.6

94.0

95.1

1.1

1.2

New Jersey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,192.3

4,224.0

4,212.6

4,245.6

33.0

0.8

Atlantic City-Hammonton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

134.5

134.6

133.6

133.4

-0.2

-0.1

Ocean City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42.0

44.0

38.8

41.5

2.7

7.0

Trenton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275.6

279.9

278.1

281.7

3.6

1.3

Vineland-Bridgeton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59.5

60.7

59.7

61.2

1.5

2.5

New Mexico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

850.6

865.7

851.6

867.8

16.2

1.9

Albuquerque. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

395.6

398.5

397.0

400.1

3.1

0.8

Farmington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48.1

48.4

48.3

48.3

0.0

0.0

Las Cruces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74.7

75.7

75.2

75.7

0.5

0.7

Santa Fe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64.1

63.8

63.9

64.0

0.1

0.2

New York. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,780.5

9,889.4

9,810.1

9,926.8

116.7

1.2

Albany-Schenectady-Troy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

480.3

479.1

481.2

483.4

2.2

0.5

Binghamton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

105.8

105.6

105.6

105.1

-0.5

-0.5

Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

572.7

576.3

571.6

575.7

4.1

0.7

Elmira. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37.0

37.2

37.5

37.3

-0.2

-0.5

Glens Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55.7

55.6

54.9

54.7

-0.2

-0.4

Ithaca. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66.9

68.7

66.8

68.4

1.6

2.4

Kingston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64.8

65.5

64.0

64.8

0.8

1.3

New York-Newark-Jersey City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,923.1

10,017.1

9,980.7

10,080.1

99.4

1.0

Rochester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

547.1

552.6

545.6

553.5

7.9

1.4

Syracuse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

325.8

330.7

325.9

330.5

4.6

1.4

Utica-Rome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129.5

129.2

129.7

129.4

-0.3

-0.2

Watertown-Fort Drum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42.3

42.7

42.1

42.3

0.2

0.5

North Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,527.9

4,617.5

4,540.4

4,629.5

89.1

2.0

Asheville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

198.1

206.0

198.1

205.1

7.0

3.5

Burlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63.4

64.3

63.9

64.4

0.5

0.8

Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,221.2

1,249.6

1,224.0

1,252.8

28.8

2.4

Durham-Chapel Hill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

315.8

320.5

316.9

320.8

3.9

1.2

Fayetteville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131.2

132.3

132.5

133.4

0.9

0.7

Goldsboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42.0

41.7

41.9

42.1

0.2

0.5

Greensboro-High Point. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

363.8

366.4

363.4

368.1

4.7

1.3

Greenville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80.7

81.9

81.0

82.7

1.7

2.1

Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

156.3

155.8

157.6

157.4

-0.2

-0.1

Jacksonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49.0

49.6

49.3

49.9

0.6

1.2

New Bern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44.6

45.1

45.0

45.3

0.3

0.7

Raleigh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

635.5

657.2

636.5

660.7

24.2

3.8

Rocky Mount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57.0

56.6

57.6

57.2

-0.4

-0.7

Wilmington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

128.9

134.7

130.2

135.4

5.2

4.0

Winston-Salem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

268.4

276.1

269.8

275.0

5.2

1.9

North Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

441.8

442.6

438.1

441.4

3.3

0.8

Bismarck. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73.3

73.5

72.7

73.5

0.8

1.1

Fargo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

144.8

145.6

143.7

146.0

2.3

1.6

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

North Dakota - Continued

Grand Forks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56.6

56.8

56.5

56.7

0.2

0.4

Ohio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,614.8

5,632.4

5,617.1

5,639.4

22.3

0.4

Akron. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

344.8

341.7

344.9

342.4

-2.5

-0.7

Canton-Massillon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

177.0

177.9

177.1

177.8

0.7

0.4

Cincinnati. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,121.9

1,140.7

1,122.3

1,142.2

19.9

1.8

Cleveland-Elyria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,075.9

1,083.2

1,076.2

1,089.8

13.6

1.3

Columbus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,113.5

1,124.3

1,114.5

1,132.2

17.7

1.6

Dayton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

391.4

396.2

393.5

397.2

3.7

0.9

Lima. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53.7

53.6

53.8

53.8

0.0

0.0

Mansfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53.1

53.0

53.0

53.6

0.6

1.1

Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50.8

50.9

50.6

50.9

0.3

0.6

Toledo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

312.4

312.4

313.7

313.4

-0.3

-0.1

Weirton-Steubenville1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40.6

39.8

40.5

39.6

-0.9

-2.2

Youngstown-Warren-Boardman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

220.1

216.5

220.7

216.1

-4.6

-2.1

Oklahoma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,705.0

1,708.3

1,711.8

1,707.4

-4.4

-0.3

Enid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25.7

25.4

25.6

25.4

-0.2

-0.8

Lawton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45.2

45.7

45.3

46.2

0.9

2.0

Oklahoma City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

659.0

666.6

661.4

666.4

5.0

0.8

Tulsa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

457.4

460.2

461.5

460.5

-1.0

-0.2

Oregon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,931.6

1,965.4

1,931.2

1,968.4

37.2

1.9

Albany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46.1

47.1

46.5

47.5

1.0

2.2

Bend-Redmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

85.7

88.3

85.3

87.8

2.5

2.9

Corvallis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44.6

45.1

44.5

45.1

0.6

1.3

Eugene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

162.3

164.5

162.3

165.1

2.8

1.7

Grants Pass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27.5

28.2

27.4

28.3

0.9

3.3

Medford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90.3

93.0

90.2

93.3

3.1

3.4

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,209.8

1,231.6

1,213.4

1,233.9

20.5

1.7

Salem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

171.4

172.7

171.8

172.1

0.3

0.2

Pennsylvania. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,087.0

6,119.0

6,085.9

6,136.9

51.0

0.8

Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

380.8

383.2

379.3

385.8

6.5

1.7

Altoona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61.2

62.0

61.6

62.0

0.4

0.6

Bloomsburg-Berwick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43.5

43.9

43.4

43.9

0.5

1.2

Chambersburg-Waynesboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62.5

63.6

62.9

64.0

1.1

1.7

East Stroudsburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58.7

59.5

59.0

59.8

0.8

1.4

Erie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130.1

130.1

129.9

130.2

0.3

0.2

Gettysburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35.6

35.9

35.5

35.7

0.2

0.6

Harrisburg-Carlisle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

348.7

348.5

349.2

351.7

2.5

0.7

Johnstown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55.3

55.6

55.1

55.5

0.4

0.7

Lancaster. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

259.6

259.6

258.0

261.0

3.0

1.2

Lebanon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53.8

55.1

53.9

55.1

1.2

2.2

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,975.4

3,002.6

2,982.3

3,011.3

29.0

1.0

Pittsburgh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,201.8

1,200.2

1,205.3

1,200.7

-4.6

-0.4

Reading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181.5

183.8

182.3

184.5

2.2

1.2

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

266.2

266.6

268.7

266.6

-2.1

-0.8

State College. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83.6

84.7

84.3

85.2

0.9

1.1

Williamsport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53.7

54.1

53.4

54.1

0.7

1.3

York-Hanover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188.6

188.7

189.0

189.8

0.8

0.4

Rhode Island. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

503.0

512.3

500.7

511.8

11.1

2.2

Providence-Warwick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

600.6

609.6

598.9

611.8

12.9

2.2

South Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,158.5

2,189.8

2,168.0

2,201.5

33.5

1.5

Charleston-North Charleston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

370.2

371.4

372.2

374.2

2.0

0.5

Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

404.2

404.6

403.7

407.7

4.0

1.0

Florence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91.7

92.4

92.4

93.1

0.7

0.8

Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

426.8

432.7

429.1

433.2

4.1

1.0

Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Beaufort. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82.1

85.9

82.1

85.6

3.5

4.3

Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

172.3

181.0

170.6

179.3

8.7

5.1

Spartanburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

159.6

163.6

160.1

164.1

4.0

2.5

Sumter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40.7

40.9

40.9

41.1

0.2

0.5

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

South Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

443.3

452.1

443.3

449.7

6.4

1.4

Rapid City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69.4

70.0

68.8

69.0

0.2

0.3

Sioux Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

159.2

164.2

159.5

163.7

4.2

2.6

Tennessee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,102.8

3,148.0

3,126.2

3,174.6

48.4

1.5

Chattanooga. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

265.1

268.3

265.3

269.3

4.0

1.5

Clarksville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93.3

95.3

94.7

95.6

0.9

1.0

Cleveland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47.1

47.6

48.9

48.6

-0.3

-0.6

Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.0

71.2

70.1

71.4

1.3

1.9

Johnson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82.3

82.5

82.2

83.1

0.9

1.1

Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

122.2

124.9

123.8

125.8

2.0

1.6

Knoxville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

403.4

412.1

406.4

415.1

8.7

2.1

Memphis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

655.7

660.0

665.0

667.1

2.1

0.3

Morristown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46.8

47.3

46.7

47.5

0.8

1.7

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,028.4

1,045.2

1,038.7

1,055.5

16.8

1.6

Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,651.0

12,966.8

12,704.1

13,047.1

343.0

2.7

Abilene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.3

71.0

70.6

71.6

1.0

1.4

Amarillo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120.5

121.3

121.4

122.0

0.6

0.5

Austin-Round Rock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,079.9

1,108.4

1,083.2

1,112.2

29.0

2.7

Beaumont-Port Arthur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

169.0

170.0

168.2

169.3

1.1

0.7

Brownsville-Harlingen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141.4

142.4

142.2

143.0

0.8

0.6

College Station-Bryan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124.2

126.3

124.4

127.1

2.7

2.2

Corpus Christi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

193.9

197.1

195.7

197.7

2.0

1.0

Dallas-FortWorth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,729.9

3,837.2

3,749.7

3,870.4

120.7

3.2

El Paso. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

320.4

324.5

321.0

327.5

6.5

2.0

Houston-TheWoodlands-Sugar Land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,121.7

3,204.1

3,137.6

3,223.1

85.5

2.7

Killeen-Temple. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

143.6

147.4

144.9

149.2

4.3

3.0

Laredo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

105.4

107.1

106.2

107.8

1.6

1.5

Longview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98.5

97.8

98.8

97.8

-1.0

-1.0

Lubbock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

149.7

151.9

150.3

152.6

2.3

1.5

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

266.3

274.6

268.5

275.4

6.9

2.6

Midland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

111.5

111.8

111.7

112.3

0.6

0.5

Odessa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82.7

83.5

82.8

83.2

0.4

0.5

San Angelo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50.2

50.6

50.4

50.7

0.3

0.6

San Antonio-New Braunfels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,063.2

1,098.4

1,068.5

1,102.2

33.7

3.2

Sherman-Denison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48.3

49.1

48.8

49.3

0.5

1.0

Texarkana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

60.4

60.5

60.8

61.2

0.4

0.7

Tyler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

107.2

108.3

107.6

108.7

1.1

1.0

Victoria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42.2

41.7

42.6

42.1

-0.5

-1.2

Waco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121.9

123.0

122.5

124.1

1.6

1.3

Wichita Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

60.0

60.0

60.2

60.4

0.2

0.3

Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,542.0

1,592.8

1,544.2

1,595.8

51.6

3.3

Logan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65.1

66.7

65.5

66.8

1.3

2.0

Ogden-Clearfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

265.0

276.6

265.0

276.0

11.0

4.2

Provo-Orem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269.6

278.0

269.7

279.0

9.3

3.4

St. George. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.3

72.8

70.4

72.9

2.5

3.6

Salt Lake City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

742.1

760.2

745.5

762.2

16.7

2.2

Vermont. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

319.5

319.6

319.3

318.2

-1.1

-0.3

Burlington-South Burlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127.4

129.5

127.4

128.6

1.2

0.9

Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,018.1

4,045.6

4,035.7

4,077.9

42.2

1.0

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78.3

75.5

78.6

79.0

0.4

0.5

Charlottesville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

119.1

120.6

119.5

121.0

1.5

1.3

Harrisonburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69.4

70.6

69.5

70.7

1.2

1.7

Lynchburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

106.0

107.0

106.6

107.1

0.5

0.5

Richmond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

681.5

687.9

683.0

695.2

12.2

1.8

Roanoke. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

162.6

165.1

162.4

166.0

3.6

2.2

Staunton-Waynesboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51.2

52.1

51.5

52.3

0.8

1.6

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

789.8

794.3

791.1

798.3

7.2

0.9

Winchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65.3

66.9

65.2

67.2

2.0

3.1

Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,449.2

3,526.2

3,446.5

3,532.7

86.2

2.5

See footnotes at end of table.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 3. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted - Continued

[In thousands]

Change from

State and area

October

November

November 2018 to November

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

Washington - Continued

Bellingham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97.3

98.5

97.5

98.0

0.5

0.5

Bremerton-Silverdale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94.0

96.4

93.9

96.9

3.0

3.2

Kennewick-Richland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117.5

121.2

117.2

121.0

3.8

3.2

Longview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40.4

40.8

40.4

40.9

0.5

1.2

Mount Vernon-Anacortes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52.2

52.4

52.2

52.5

0.3

0.6

Olympia-Tumwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121.7

124.5

121.5

124.7

3.2

2.6

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,067.2

2,128.3

2,073.7

2,132.9

59.2

2.9

Spokane-Spokane Valley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

255.1

260.8

255.4

259.6

4.2

1.6

Walla Walla. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29.0

29.4

29.1

29.6

0.5

1.7

Wenatchee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47.1

47.6

46.2

47.3

1.1

2.4

Yakima. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88.3

89.1

87.3

88.6

1.3

1.5

West Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

740.3

742.8

740.5

740.5

0.0

0.0

Beckley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44.7

44.8

44.0

44.2

0.2

0.5

Charleston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

110.6

110.2

110.5

110.1

-0.4

-0.4

Huntington-Ashland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

136.0

135.6

136.5

136.2

-0.3

-0.2

Morgantown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72.0

71.2

72.0

71.6

-0.4

-0.6

Parkersburg-Vienna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38.3

38.6

38.4

38.6

0.2

0.5

Wheeling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.1

69.9

70.3

69.8

-0.5

-0.7

Wisconsin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,992.5

3,011.6

2,999.7

3,005.9

6.2

0.2

Appleton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

125.8

126.4

126.4

126.8

0.4

0.3

Eau Claire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87.8

88.9

88.5

88.6

0.1

0.1

Fond du Lac. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49.4

49.4

49.4

49.5

0.1

0.2

Green Bay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183.3

186.2

184.0

186.5

2.5

1.4

Janesville-Beloit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69.8

71.1

70.1

71.9

1.8

2.6

La Crosse-Onalaska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79.7

81.3

80.2

82.0

1.8

2.2

Madison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

406.0

412.0

408.4

414.4

6.0

1.5

Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

879.0

890.3

878.9

893.2

14.3

1.6

Oshkosh-Neenah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98.5

99.3

98.6

99.7

1.1

1.1

Racine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79.1

79.4

79.2

78.9

-0.3

-0.4

Sheboygan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63.7

64.8

63.3

64.4

1.1

1.7

Wausau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73.3

74.5

73.5

74.7

1.2

1.6

Wyoming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

289.0

288.9

285.0

283.9

-1.1

-0.4

Casper. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39.4

39.6

39.1

39.3

0.2

0.5

Cheyenne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47.1

47.6

46.8

47.2

0.4

0.9

Puerto Rico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

870.9

874.6

877.4

883.1

5.7

0.6

Aguadilla-Isabela. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50.4

50.9

50.7

51.2

0.5

1.0

Arecibo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34.1

34.6

34.3

35.1

0.8

2.3

Guayama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13.7

13.7

13.9

13.8

-0.1

-0.7

Mayaguez. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

32.4

32.7

32.7

33.2

0.5

1.5

Ponce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67.4

67.2

68.2

67.9

-0.3

-0.4

San German. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20.0

20.6

20.3

20.8

0.5

2.5

San Juan-Carolina-Caguas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

634.2

633.3

639.3

639.8

0.5

0.1

Virgin Islands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33.6

35.5

34.0

35.8

1.8

5.3

  • For operational reasons, these interstate areas are listed under the state that accounts for the larger share of the population, which is different from the state that contains the first principal city.
  • Area boundary does not reflect official OMB delineation. p Preliminary

NOTE: Data are counts of jobs by place of work. Estimates subsequent to the current benchmark are preliminary and will be revised when new information becomes available. Area delineations are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18-03, dated April 10, 2018, and are available on the BLS website at https://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs), while areas in other states are county-based. Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. They are listed under the state containing the first principal city, unless otherwise footnoted. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month.

ESTABLISHMENT DATA

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Table 4. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state, selected metropolitan area, and metropolitan division, not seasonally adjusted1

[In thousands]

Change from

October

November

November 2018 to November

State, area, and division

2019p

2018

2019

2018

2019p

Number

Percent

California. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,344.3

17,660.6

17,440.7

17,766.9

326.2

1.9

Los Angeles-LongBeach-Anaheim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,217.4

6,302.2

6,247.2

6,343.2

96.0

1.5

Anaheim-SantaAna-Irvine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,663.8

1,683.8

1,672.2

1,686.3

14.1

0.8

Los Angeles-LongBeach-Glendale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,553.6

4,618.4

4,575.0

4,656.9

81.9

1.8

San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,461.0

2,528.0

2,479.2

2,538.7

59.5

2.4

Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,186.1

1,210.9

1,194.8

1,214.7

19.9

1.7

San Francisco-RedwoodCity-South San Francisco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,157.9

1,196.7

1,167.3

1,203.0

35.7

3.1

San Rafael. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117.0

120.4

117.1

121.0

3.9

3.3

District of Columbia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

797.6

805.1

795.4

807.9

12.5

1.6

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,313.2

3,363.7

3,323.8

3,384.9

61.1

1.8

Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

596.9

599.2

598.1

602.9

4.8

0.8

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,716.3

2,764.5

2,725.7

2,782.0

56.3

2.1

Florida. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,855.3

9,089.2

8,954.8

9,174.8

220.0

2.5

Miami-FortLauderdale-West Palm Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,705.6

2,755.3

2,735.0

2,775.1

40.1

1.5

Fort Lauderdale-PompanoBeach-Deerfield Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

861.5

874.4

868.3

879.5

11.2

1.3

Miami-MiamiBeach-Kendall. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,210.1

1,235.5

1,220.9

1,245.6

24.7

2.0

West Palm Beach-BocaRaton-Delray Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

634.0

645.4

645.8

650.0

4.2

0.7

Illinois. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,197.8

6,262.2

6,205.9

6,243.4

37.5

0.6

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,806.1

4,860.4

4,820.0

4,848.6

28.6

0.6

Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,827.8

3,866.5

3,837.3

3,861.5

24.2

0.6

Elgin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

267.4

271.4

269.1

270.1

1.0

0.4

Gary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

281.8

285.8

284.0

284.6

0.6

0.2

Lake County-Kenosha County2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

429.1

436.7

429.6

432.4

2.8

0.7

Massachusetts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,679.6

3,730.4

3,678.0

3,727.3

49.3

1.3

Boston-Cambridge-Nashua2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,793.9

2,834.9

2,796.5

2,835.5

39.0

1.4

Boston-Cambridge-Newton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,889.4

1,924.5

1,890.6

1,925.6

35.0

1.9

Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82.9

83.5

83.3

84.2

0.9

1.1

Framingham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

174.8

175.7

174.9

175.9

1.0

0.6

Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67.6

68.6

67.3

68.7

1.4

2.1

Lawrence-MethuenTown-Salem2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82.8

81.4

82.7

80.8

-1.9

-2.3

Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

160.3

161.4

160.1

161.1

1.0

0.6

Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45.5

46.9

45.7

46.6

0.9

2.0

Nashua2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131.3

132.0

132.3

131.7

-0.6

-0.5

Peabody-Salem-Beverly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96.8

98.7

96.8

98.2

1.4

1.4

Taunton-Middleborough-Norton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62.5

62.2

62.8

62.7

-0.1

-0.2

Michigan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,470.2

4,465.4

4,468.3

4,485.7

17.4

0.4

Detroit-Warren-Dearborn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,050.9

2,041.8

2,052.7

2,046.1

-6.6

-0.3

Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

771.2

767.5

772.9

771.8

-1.1

-0.1

Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,279.7

1,274.3

1,279.8

1,274.3

-5.5

-0.4

New York. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,780.5

9,889.4

9,810.1

9,926.8

116.7

1.2

New York-Newark-Jersey City2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,923.1

10,017.1

9,980.7

10,080.1

99.4

1.0

Dutchess County-Putnam County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150.1

152.0

151.2

152.9

1.7

1.1

Nassau County-Suffolk County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,350.4

1,366.2

1,356.3

1,367.6

11.3

0.8

Newark3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,225.9

1,236.5

1,232.5

1,241.6

9.1

0.7

New York-JerseyCity-White Plains2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,196.7

7,262.4

7,240.7

7,318.0

77.3

1.1

Pennsylvania. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6,087.0

6,119.0

6,085.9

6,136.9

51.0

0.8

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,975.4

3,002.6

2,982.3

3,011.3

29.0

1.0

Camden3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

545.2

542.0

547.9

541.9

-6.0

-1.1

Montgomery County-BucksCounty-Chester County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,083.8

1,093.5

1,084.5

1,092.1

7.6

0.7

Philadelphia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

981.6

995.9

983.6

1,002.7

19.1

1.9

Wilmington3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

364.8

371.2

366.3

374.6

8.3

2.3

Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,651.0

12,966.8

12,704.1

13,047.1

343.0

2.7

Dallas-FortWorth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,729.9

3,837.2

3,749.7

3,870.4

120.7

3.2

Dallas-Plano-Irving. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,658.9

2,752.8

2,674.8

2,772.6

97.8

3.7

Fort Worth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,071.0

1,084.4

1,074.9

1,097.8

22.9

2.1

Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,449.2

3,526.2

3,446.5

3,532.7

86.2

2.5

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,067.2

2,128.3

2,073.7

2,132.9

59.2

2.9

Seattle-Bellevue-Everett. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,741.2

1,796.9

1,748.6

1,801.8

53.2

3.0

Tacoma-Lakewood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

326.0

331.4

325.1

331.1

6.0

1.8

  • These 11 areas contain all of the 38 metropolitan divisions.
  • Part of the area (or division) is in one or more adjacent states.
    3 All of the division is in one or more adjacent states. p Preliminary

NOTE: Data are counts of jobs by place of work. Estimates subsequent to the current benchmark are preliminary and will be revised when new information becomes available. Area definitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18-03, dated April 10, 2018, and available at https://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs), while areas in other states are county-based. Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. They are listed under the state containing the first principal city. Metropolitan divisions are listed under their metropolitan areas. Some divisions lie in more than one state, and some, like Camden, NJ, are totally outside the states under which their metropolitan areas are listed.For Washington-Arlington-Alexandria,DC-VA-MD-WV, the metropolitan area and division titles are identical. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month.

Map 1. Unemployment rates for metropolitan areas, not seasonally adjusted, November 2019

(U.S. rate = 3.3 percent)

NOTE: Map includes data for 389 metropolitan areas based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18-03. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town areas (NECTAs), while areas in other states are county-based.

Above U.S. average U.S. average or below

Map 2. Over-the-year percentage change in employment, by metropolitan area, not seasonally adjusted, November 2019

(U.S. average = 1.5 percent)

NOTE: Map includes data for 389 metropolitan areas based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 18- 03. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town areas (NECTAs), while areas in other states are county based.

AboveU.S. average U.S. average or below

Attachments

  • Original document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

BLS - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics published this content on 03 January 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 03 January 2020 15:12:00 UTC