Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
309 NOK | -0.52% |
|
+3.48% | +5.60% |
06-21 | Factbox-European companies cut jobs as economy sputters | RE |
06-18 | Global markets live: Shell, UBS, Boeing, Berkshire Hathaway, Exxon... | ![]() |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- Margins returned by the company are among the highest on the stock exchange list. Its core activity clears big profits.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 265.7 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
- Based on current prices, the company has particularly high valuation levels.
- The company is highly valued given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Consumer Publishing
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+5.60% | 6.62B | B | ||
+1.39% | 8.27B | A | ||
+25.44% | 4.58B | - | ||
+25.99% | 3.89B | D- | ||
+15.07% | 3.19B | B+ | ||
+23.80% | 3.11B | C- | ||
-2.07% | 2.4B | - | ||
+37.42% | 1.97B | C+ | ||
-9.47% | 1.43B | - | ||
+4.70% | 1.3B | - | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- SCHA Stock
- Ratings Schibsted ASA