Overview

LegacyXchange, Inc., formerly known as True 2 Beauty, Inc. (the "Company") was originally incorporated as Burrow Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation, on December 11, 2006. In February 2010, the Company shifted its focus to the beauty industry and later amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name to True 2 Beauty, Inc., to better reflect its new business focus.

On July 10, 2012, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary True2Bid, Inc. ("True2Bid") which was incorporated in the state of Nevada. This subsidiary's name was changed to LegacyXchange, Inc. ("LegacyXchange") in December 2014. The Company continued to sell existing inventory of beauty products through May 2013 when the final inventory was sold. LegacyXchange operates an online e-commerce platform focused on delivering users a wide array of sports and entertainment related products that can be won in an action-packed environment of a live auction. The Company has ceased all operations related to LegacyXchange. Currently, management is seeking other business opportunities.

The Company's articles authorize the Company to issue 190,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, both at a par value of $0.001 per share.

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 and is based primarily on the comparative audited consolidated financial statements, footnotes and related information for the periods identified and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this annual report.





                               Years Ended
                                March 31,
                          2016            2015
Loss from operations   $ (745,943 )   $   (590,987 )
Other expense, net       (184,131 )       (781,375 )
Net loss               $ (930,074 )   $ (1,372,362 )




Revenue and gross loss



For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we generated limited revenue of $0 and $437, respectively, and gross loss of $0 and $1,789, respectively, primarily attributed to the sale of remaining inventory of beauty products in 2015.





Operating expenses


For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, operating expenses amounted to $745,943 and $589,198, respectively, an increase of $156,745 or 27%. For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, operating expenses consisted of the following:





                                              For the Years Ended
                                                   March 31,
                                               2016          2015
Compensation and related taxes              $  283,500     $ 156,873
Professional and consulting fees               413,543       361,463
Other selling, general and administrative       48,900        70,862
Total                                       $  745,943     $ 589,198




                                        3




? Compensation and related taxes:

For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, compensation and related taxes amounted to $283,500 and $156,873, respectively, an increase of $126,627 or 81%. The increase was primarily attributable to stock-based compensation to an executive and director in the amount of $139,000 during fiscal year 2016.

? Professional and consulting fees:

For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, professional and consulting fees amounted to $413,543 and $361,463, respectively, an increase of $52,080 or 14%. The increase was primarily attributable to the change in our product line from beauty products to sports and entertainment related products.

? Other selling, general and administrative:

For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, other selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $48,900 and $70,862, respectively, a decrease of $21,962, or 31%. The decrease was primarily attributable to decrease in travel and entertainment expenses and other administrative expenses during fiscal year 2016.





Loss from operations:



For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, loss from operations amounted to $745,943 and $590,987, respectively, an increase of $154,956, or 26%. The change was a result of the changes in operating expenses as discussed above.





Other income (expense):


Other income (expense) includes interest expense, initial derivative expense, gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liabilities, loss on debt extinguishment.

For the year ended March 31, 2016, total other expense, net, amounted to $184,131 as compared to $781,375 for the year ended March 31, 2015, a decrease of $597,244. The decrease in other expense was attributable to an increase in interest expense of $260,541, or 367%, increase in initial derivative expense of $156,276, or 436% and increase in loss on debt extinguishment of $81,853 or 1,486%, for a total increase in other (expense) of $(498,670) offset by other income from gain on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $1,095,914 or 164%.





Net loss:



For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, net loss amounted to $930,074 and $1,372,362, respectively, a decrease of $442,288, or 32%, or a net loss per common share of $0.02 and $0.04 (basic and diluted), respectively. The change was a result of the changes in operating expenses and other expenses as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. We had a working capital deficit of $1,300,891 and $4,209 of cash as of March 31, 2016 and working capital deficit of $1,246,806 and $4,362 of cash as of March 31, 2015.





                                                                      Year Ended
                                                                      March 31,
                                                                         2016
                             March 31,        March 31,                      Percentage
                                2016             2015          Change          Change
Working capital deficit:
Total current assets        $     65,826     $     33,163     $  32,663               98 %
Total current liabilities     (1,366,717 )     (1,279,969 )     (86,748 )              7 %
Working capital deficit:    $ (1,300,891 )   $ (1,246,806 )   $ (54,085 )              4 %



The increase in working capital deficit was primarily attributable to increase in current assets of $32,663 offset by an increase in current liabilities of $86,748.





                                        4





Cash Flow



A summary of cash flow activities is summarized as follows:





                                               Year Ended
                                                March 31,
                                           2016           2015

Cash used in operating activities $ (344,172 ) $ (476,878 ) Cash provided by financing activities 344,019 471,895 Net decrease in cash

$     (153 )   $   (4,983 )

Net cash used in operating activities:

Net cash flow used in operating activities was $344,172 for the year ended March 31, 2016 as compared to $476,878 for the year ended March 31, 2015, a decrease of $132,706 or 28%.

? Net cash flow used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2016

primarily reflected our net loss of $930,074 adjusted for the add-back on

non-cash items such as stock-based compensation expense $163,500, common stock

issued for services and loan fees of $220,140, loss on debt extinguishment of

$87,363, amortization of debt discount of $267,865, initial fair value expense

of derivative liabilities of $191,151, gain on the change in fair value of

derivative liabilities of $426,829 and the changes in operating assets and

liabilities primarily consisting of an increase in prepaid expenses and other

current assets of $32,816, increase in accounts payable of $60,679 and increase

in accrued liabilities of $53,849.

? Net cash flow used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2015

primarily reflected our net loss $1,372,362 adjusted for the add-back on

non-cash items such common stock issued for services of $81,823, debt

extinguishment of $5,510, amortization of debt discount of $53,212, initial

fair value expense of derivative liabilities of $35,875, loss on the change in

fair value of derivative liabilities of $669,085 and the changes in operating

assets and liabilities primarily consisting of an increase in prepaid expenses

of $9,940, increase in accounts payable $82,172 offset by a decrease in accrued


   liabilities of $22,253.



Cash provided by financing activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $344,019 for the year ended March 31, 2016 as compared to $471,895 for the year ended March 31, 2016, a decrease of $127,876 or 27%.

? Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2016

consisted of $132,769 of net proceeds from loan payable and $211,250 of net

proceeds from convertible debt, net of discounts.

? Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2015

consisted of $400,000 of net proceeds from convertible debt, net of discounts

and $71,895 net proceeds from sale of common stock.






Cash Requirements


Our management does not believe that our current capital resources will be adequate to continue operating our company and maintaining our business strategy for more than 12 months from the date of this report. Accordingly, we will have to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.





Going Concern


The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in our accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had net loss and net cash used in operating activities of $930,074 and $344,172, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2016. The Company had accumulated deficit, stockholders' deficit and working capital deficit of $10,546,037, $1,300,891 and $1,300,891, respectively, at March 31, 2016. The Company had no revenues for the year ended March 31, 2016, and we defaulted on our debt. Management believes that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months from the issuance date of this report.





                                        5




Management cannot provide assurance that we will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity capital. Management believes that our capital resources are not currently adequate to continue operating and maintaining its business strategy for a period of twelve months from the issuance date of this report. The Company will seek to raise capital through additional debt and/or equity financings to fund its operations in the future.

Although the Company has historically raised capital from sales of equity and from the issuance of promissory notes, there is no assurance that it will be able to continue to do so. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital or secure additional lending in the near future, management expects that the Company will need to curtail or cease operations. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Additional Purchaser Rights and Company Obligations

The Securities Purchase Agreements include additional purchaser rights and Company obligations including obligations on the Company to reimburse the Purchasers for legal fees and expenses, satisfy the current public information requirements under SEC Rule 144(c), obligations on the Company with respect to the use of proceeds from the sale of securities and Purchaser rights to participate in future Company financings. Reference should be made to the full text of the Securities Purchase Agreement.

Common Stock for Debt Conversion

During the year ended March 31, 2016, the Company issued 7,065,084 shares of its common stock upon the conversion of principal note balances of $130,510 and accrued interest of $10,792. These shares of common stock had an aggregate fair value $304,022 and the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate converted amount of $141,302 resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $162,720.

During the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued 499,300 shares of its common stock upon the conversion of principal note balances of $20,000 and accrued interest of $2,000. These shares of common stock had an aggregate fair value $27,510 and the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate converted amount of $22,000 resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $5,510.

Sales of Common Stock Pursuant to Subscription Agreements

During the year ended March 31, 2016, there were no sales of common stock.

During the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company sold 1,303,088 shares of its common stock to several investors for cash proceeds of $71,895, or $0.06 per share pursuant to unit subscription agreements. The Company also issued 2,062,246 shares of its common stock in relation to subscription advances received in fiscal year 2014 in the amount of $113,525 or $0.06 per share.





Future Financings


We will require additional financing to fund our planned operations. We currently do not have committed sources of additional financing and may not be able to obtain additional financing particularly, if the volatile conditions of the stock and financial markets persist.

There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to further delay or further scale down some or all of our activities or perhaps even cease the operations of the business.

Since inception we have funded our operations primarily through equity and debt financings and we expect that we will continue to fund our operations through the equity and debt financing. If we are able to raise additional financing by issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders' ownership will be diluted. Obtaining commercial or other loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on his, her, or its investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business and results of operations. Our reported results are impacted by the application of the following accounting policies, certain of which require management to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact quarterly or annual results of operations. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.





                                        6





Use of Estimates


The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates during the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 include assumptions used in assessing estimates of deferred tax valuation allowances, the fair value of non-cash equity transactions and the valuation of derivative liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to the Company on March 31. 2016. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments. FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:





  Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
  assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

  Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
  in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and
  liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
  that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable
  market data.

  Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity's own
  assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing
  the asset or liability based on the best available information.



The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, due from and to related parties, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.





Derivative Liabilities



The Company has certain financial instruments that are embedded derivatives associated with capital raises and certain warrants. The Company evaluates all its financial instruments to determine if those contracts or any potential embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-10 - Derivative and Hedging - Contract in Entity's Own Equity. This accounting treatment requires that the carrying amount of any derivatives be recorded at fair value at issuance and marked-to-market at each balance sheet date. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, as is the case with the Company, the change in the fair value during the period is recorded as either other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or repayment, the respective derivative liability is marked to fair value at the conversion, repayment or exercise date and then the related fair value amount is reclassified to other income or expense as part of gain or loss on debt extinguishment.

In July 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features. These amendments simplify the accounting for certain financial instruments with down-round features. The amendments require companies to disregard the down-round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.





Revenue Recognition


In May 2014, FASB issued an update Accounting Standards Update, ASU 2014-09, establishing ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017, requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and also requires certain additional disclosures. adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the process for, timing of, and presentation and disclosure of revenue recognition from customers. The Company did not have revenues from operations for the year ended March 31, 2016.





                                        7





Stock-Based Compensation


Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

Through March 31, 2018, pursuant to ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, all share-based payments to non-employees, including grants of stock options, were recognized in the consolidated financial statements as compensation expense over the service period of the consulting arrangement or until performance conditions are expected to be met. Using a Black Scholes valuation model, the Company periodically reassessed the fair value of non-employee options until service conditions are met, which generally aligns with the vesting period of the options, and the Company adjusts the expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements accordingly. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of the stock-based compensation guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. ASU No. 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, but entities may not adopt prior to adopting the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC 606. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2014-12). The guidance applies to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. For all entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). The guidance in ASU 2014-15 sets forth management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern as well as required disclosures. ASU 2014-15 indicates that, when preparing financial statements for interim and annual financial statements, management should evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This evaluation should include consideration of conditions and events that are either known or are reasonably knowable at the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, as well as whether it is probable that management's plans to address the substantial doubt will be implemented and, if so, whether it is probable that the plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.





                                        8




In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13-Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe this will have any material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Removals. The following disclosure requirements were removed from Topic 820:





  1. The amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the
     fair value hierarchy

  2. The policy for timing of transfers between levels

  3. The valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements

  4. For nonpublic entities, the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the
     period included in earnings for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements
     held at the end of the reporting period.



Modifications. The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820:





  1. In lieu of a roll forward for Level 3 fair value measurements, a nonpublic
     entity is required to disclose transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair
     value hierarchy and purchases and issues of Level 3 assets and liabilities.

  2. For investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value, an entity
     is required to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee's assets and
     the date when restrictions from redemption might lapse only if the investee
     has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly.

  3. The amendments clarify that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to
     communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the
     reporting date.



Additions. The following disclosure requirements were added to Topic 820; however, the disclosures are not required for nonpublic entities:





  1. The changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other
     comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at
     the end of the reporting period.

  2. The range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to
     develop Level 3 fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an
     entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or
     arithmetic average) in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines
     that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational
     method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop
     Level 3 fair value measurements.



In addition, the amendments eliminate at a minimum from the phrase an entity shall disclose at a minimum to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements. The Company is evaluating the impact of the revised guidance and believes that it will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.





                                        9

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses