We prepared the following discussion and analysis to help readers better
understand our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, and
results of operations for the three months ended January 31, 2020 and 2019. This
section should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated unaudited
financial statements and related notes in PART I - Item 1 of this report and the
information contained in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2019.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The SEC encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information so
investors can better understand future prospects and make informed investment
decisions. As such, we have historical information, as well as forward-looking
statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations,
performance, and prospects in this report. All statements that are not
historical or current facts are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you
can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "anticipates,"
"believes," "could," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "plans,"
"potential," "predicts," "projects," "should," "will," "would," and similar
expressions.
Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors, many of which may be beyond our control, and
may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from
those projected in, expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. While it
is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those estimated by us are described more
particularly in the "Risk Factors" section of our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended October 31, 2019 as supplemented by the risk factors disclosed in
Item 1A of this report on Form 10-Q. These risks and uncertainties include, but
are not limited to, the following:
· Fluctuations in the price of ethanol, which is affected by various factors
including: the overall supply and demand for ethanol and corn; the price of
gasoline, crude oil and corn, government policies, the price and availability
of competing fuels;
· Fluctuations in the price of crude oil and gasoline and the impact of lower oil
and gasoline prices on ethanol prices and demand;
· Fluctuations in the availability and price of corn, which is affected by
various factors including: domestic stocks, demand from corn-consuming
industries, such as the ethanol industry, prices for alternative crops,
increasing input costs, changes in government policies, shifts in global
markets or damaging growing conditions, such as plant disease or adverse
weather, including drought;
· Fluctuations in the availability and price of natural gas, which may be
affected by factors such as weather, drilling economics, overall economic
conditions, and government regulations;
· Negative operating margins which may result from lower ethanol and/or high corn
prices;
· Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events
causing an economic impact in the agriculture, oil, or automobile industries;
· Overcapacity and oversupply in the ethanol industry;
· Ethanol may trade at a premium to gasoline at times, resulting in a
disincentive for discretionary blending of ethanol beyond the requirements of
the RFS and consequently negatively impacting ethanol prices and demand;
· Changes in federal and/or state laws and environmental regulations including
elimination, waiver, or reduction of the corn-based ethanol use requirement in
the RFS and legislative acts taken by state governments such as California
related to low-carbon fuels, may have an adverse effect on our business;
· Any impairment of the transportation, storage and blending infrastructure that
prevents ethanol from reaching markets;
· Any effect on prices and demand for our products resulting from actions in
international markets, particularly imposition of tariffs;
· Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;
· Effect of our risk mitigation strategies and hedging activities on our
financial performance and cash flows;
· Competition from alternative fuels and alternative fuel additives;
· Changes or advances in plant production capacity or technical difficulties in
operating the plant; and
· Our reliance on key management personnel.
17
Table of Contents
We believe our expectations regarding future events are based on reasonable
assumptions; however, these assumptions may not be accurate or account for all
risks and uncertainties. Consequently, forward-looking statements are not
guaranteed. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied
in our forward-looking statements. In addition, we are not obligated and do not
intend to update our forward-looking statements because of new information
unless it is required by applicable securities laws. We caution investors not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which represent management's
views as of the date of this report. We qualify all of our forward-looking
statements by these cautionary statements.
Industry and Market Data
Much of the information in this report regarding the ethanol industry, including
government regulation relevant to the industry is from information published by
the Renewable Fuels Association ("RFA"), a national trade association for the
United States ("U.S.") ethanol industry, and information about the market for
our products and competition is derived from publicly available information from
governmental agencies or publications and other published independent
sources. Although we believe our third-party sources are reliable, we have not
independently verified the information.
Available Information
Our website address is www.heronlakebioenergy.com. Our annual report on Form
10-K, periodic reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments
to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available, free of charge, on our website
under the link "SEC Filings," as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such materials with, or furnish such materials to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The contents of our website are not
incorporated by reference in this report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
Heron Lake BioEnergy, LLC is a Minnesota limited liability company that owns and
operates a dry mill corn-based, natural gas fired ethanol plant near Heron Lake,
Minnesota. Our business consists of the production and sale of our ethanol
throughout the continental U.S. and sale of its co-products (wet, modified wet
and dried distillers' grains, corn oil, and corn syrup) locally, and throughout
the continental U.S. Additionally, through a wholly owned subsidiary, HLBE
Pipeline Company, LLC ("HLBE Pipeline Company"), we are the sole owner of
Agrinatural Gas, LLC ("Agrinatural"). Beginning as of December 11, 2019, we hold
a 100% interest in Agrinatural. At October 31, 2019, we held a 73% interest in
Agrinatural. Agrinatural operates a natural gas pipeline that provides natural
gas to Heron Lake BioEnergy, LLC's ethanol production facility and other
customers.
When we use the terms "Heron Lake BioEnergy," "Heron Lake," or "HLBE" or similar
words, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring to Heron Lake
BioEnergy, LLC and our operations at our ethanol production facility located
near Heron Lake, Minnesota. When we use the terms the "Company," "we," "us,"
"our" or similar words, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring
to Heron Lake BioEnergy and its wholly owned subsidiary, HLBE Pipeline Company,
LLC, and its majority-owned subsidiary Agrinatural.
Reportable Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Based on the nature of the products, services and operations and
the expected financial results, we review our operations within the following
two separate operating segments: (1) ethanol production; and (2) natural gas
pipeline operations. We currently do not have or anticipate we will have any
other lines of business or other significant sources of revenue other than the
sale of ethanol, distillers' grains, corn oil and natural gas
transportation. Refer to Note 12, "Business Segments," of the notes to the
condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements for financial information
about our financial reporting segments.
Ethanol Production
Our primary line of business is the Company's operation of its ethanol plant,
including the production and sale of ethanol and its co-products (distillers'
grains, non-edible corn oil and corn syrup). These operations are aggregated
into one financial reporting segment.
18
Table of Contents
Our ethanol plant has a nameplate capacity of 50 million gallons per year. We
have received EPA pathway approval and have obtained permits from the Minnesota
Pollution Control Authority to increase our production capacity to approximately
72.3 million gallons of undenatured fuel-grade ethanol on a twelve-month rolling
sum basis. We are currently operating above our stated nameplate capacity and
intend to continue to do into the near future, dependent on industry conditions
and plant profitability.
We have a management services agreement with Granite Falls Energy, LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company that operates an ethanol plant located in
Granite Falls, Minnesota ("GFE"). GFE owns approximately 50.7% of our
outstanding membership units. Pursuant to the management services agreement, GFE
provides its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and commodity
risk manager to act in those positions as our part-time officers. The management
services automatically renews for successive one-year terms until either party
gives the other party written notice of termination prior to expiration of the
then current term. The management services agreement may also be terminated by
either party for cause under certain circumstances.
We market and sell our products primarily using third party marketers. The
markets in which our products are sold may be local, regional, national, and
international and depend primarily upon the efforts of third party marketers. We
have contracted with Eco-Energy, LLC to market all of our ethanol, Gavilon
Ingredients, LLC to market our distillers' grains, and RPMG, Inc. to market our
corn oil. We also occasionally independently market and sell excess corn syrup
from the distillation process to local livestock feeders.
Our cost of our goods sold consists primarily of costs relating to the corn and
natural gas supplies necessary to produce ethanol and distillers' grains for
sale at our ethanol plant. We generally do not have long-term, fixed price
contracts for the purchase of corn. Typically, we purchase our corn directly
from grain elevators, farmers, and local dealers within approximately 80 miles
of Heron Lake, Minnesota.
We have a facilities agreement with Northern Border Pipeline Company, which
allows us access to an existing interstate natural gas pipeline located
approximately 16 miles north from our plant. We have entered into a firm natural
gas transportation agreement with Agrinatural, our indirectly wholly owned
subsidiary. We also have an agreement with Constellation New Energy-Gas
Division, LLC to supply the natural gas necessary to operate our plant.
Natural Gas Pipeline
Through our wholly owned subsidiary, HLBE Pipeline Company, we indirectly own
100% of Agrinatural Gas, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
("Agrinatural"), a natural gas distribution and sales company located in Heron
Lake, Minnesota. On October 18, 2019, HLBE Pipeline Company entered into an
agreement to purchase the 27% non-controlling interest in Agrinatural, which
became effective on December 11, 2019. Prior to December 11, 2019, Rural Energy
Solutions, LLC owned a 27% non-controlling interest in Agrinatural. Agrinatural
owns approximately 190 miles of natural gas pipeline and provides natural gas to
the Company's ethanol plant and other commercial, agricultural, and residential
customers through a connection with the natural gas pipeline facilities of
Northern Border Pipeline Company. Agrinatural's revenues are generated through
natural gas distribution fees and sales. The operations of Agrinatural's natural
gas pipeline are aggregated into a separate financial reporting segment.
Agrinatural has a natural gas local distribution company management agreement
with GFE pursuant to which GFE's chief executive officer and chief financial
officer also hold those same offices with Agrinatural. The agreement
automatically renews for successive one-year terms unless either Agrinatural or
GFE gives the other party written notice of termination prior to expiration of
the then current term. The agreement may also be terminated by either party for
cause under certain circumstances.
The Company has two intercompany credit facilities with Agrinatural: a July 2014
credit facility, as amended (the "Original Credit Facility") and a March 2015
credit facility, as amended (the "Additional Credit Facility"). Under the
Original Credit Facility, the Company made a five-year term loan in the
principal amount of $3.05 million and pursuant to the Additional Credit
Facility, made a four-year term loan in the principal amount of $3.5 million to
Agrinatural. Subsequent to the closing of the Company's indirect acquisition of
Agrinatural's non-controlling interest in December 2019, the parties agreed to
forgive the debt related to both the Original Credit Facility and the Additional
Credit Facility. Additional details are provided below in the section below
entitled "PART I - Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources;
Indebtedness."
19
Table of Contents
During the normal course of business, the Company enters into transactions
between its two operating segments as a result of HLBE's firm natural gas
transportation agreement with Agrinatural. These intersegment activities are
recorded by each segment at prices approximating market and treated as if they
are third-party transactions. Consequently, these transactions impact segment
performance. However, the revenues and corresponding costs are eliminated in
consolidation and do not impact the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated
results.
Plan of Operations for the Next Twelve Months
Over the next twelve months we will continue our focus on operational
improvements at our plant. These operational improvements include exploring
methods to improve ethanol yield per bushel and increasing production output at
our plant, continued emphasis on safety and environmental regulation, reducing
our operating costs, and optimizing our margin opportunities through prudent
risk-management policies.
The Company, and the ethanol industry as a whole, experienced significant
adverse conditions throughout most of 2019 and into 2020 as a result of
industry-wide record low ethanol prices due to reduced demand and high industry
inventory levels. These factors resulted in prolonged negative operating
margins, significantly lower cash flow from operations and substantial net
losses. We expect to have sufficient cash generated by continuing operations and
availability on our credit facility to fund our operations. However, should
unfavorable operating conditions continue in the ethanol industry that prevent
us from profitably operating our plant, we may need to seek additional funding.
In addition, we expect to continue to conduct routine maintenance and repair
activities at the ethanol plant to maintain current plant infrastructure, as
well as small capital projects, including the construction of additional grain
storage, to improve operating efficiency. We anticipate using cash we generate
from our operations and our revolving term loan to finance these plant upgrade
projects.
Trends and Uncertainties Impacting Our Operations
The principal factors affecting our results of operations and financial
conditions are the market prices for corn, ethanol, distillers' grains, and
natural gas. As a result, our operating results can fluctuate substantially due
to volatility in these commodity markets. Governmental programs designed to
create incentives for the use of corn-based ethanol also have a significant
impact on market prices for ethanol. Other factors that may affect our future
results of operation include those risks discussed below and in "PART II - Item
1A. Risk Factors" of this report and "PART I - Item 1A. Risk Factors" of our
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019.
The price and availability of corn is subject to significant fluctuations
depending upon a number of factors that affect commodity prices in general,
including crop conditions, yields, domestic and global stocks, weather, federal
policy, and foreign trade. Natural gas prices are influenced by severe weather
in the summer and winter and hurricanes in the spring, summer, and fall. Other
factors include North American exploration and production, and the amount of
natural gas in underground storage during injection and withdrawal
seasons. Ethanol prices are sensitive to world crude oil supply and demand,
domestic gasoline supply and demand, the price of crude oil, gasoline and corn,
the price of substitute fuels and octane enhancers, refining capacity and
utilization, government regulation and incentives and consumer demand for
alternative fuels. Distillers' grains prices are impacted by livestock numbers
on feed, prices for feed alternatives and supply, which is associated with
ethanol plant production.
Because the market price of ethanol is not always directly related to corn, at
times ethanol prices may lag price movements in corn prices and corn-ethanol
price spread may be tightly compressed or negative. If the corn-ethanol spread
is compressed or negative for sustained period, it is possible that our
operating margins will decline or become negative and our ethanol plant may not
generate adequate cash flow for operations. In such cases, we may reduce or
cease production at our ethanol plant to minimize our variable costs and
optimize cash flow.
Management currently believes that our margins will remain negative or low
during the remainder of the fiscal year 2020. Continued large corn supplies and
ethanol production capacity increases could have a negative impact on the market
price of ethanol which could adversely impact our profitability. This negative
impact could worsen if domestic ethanol inventories remain high or grow, or if
U.S. exports of ethanol decline. Recent US Energy Information Administration
("EIA") reports indicate that ethanol stocks remain high and that ethanol
production remains steady since the conclusion of fiscal year 2019. In addition,
management believes that increased waivers of small refiner renewable
20
Table of Contents
volume obligations ("RVOs") by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"),
as well as uncertainty regarding the Renewable Fuels Standard ("RFS") reset,
will contribute to the projected negative or low margins.
Additionally, while ethanol continues trading at a significant discount to
gasoline, which has improved export demand somewhat, increased waivers of small
refiner RVOs by the EPA has contributed to management's expectation regarding
margins. The impact of the increases in small refiner waivers granted by the EPA
and the reductions in Chinese imports continues to have a negative impact on
prices for renewable identification numbers ("RINs") for corn-based ethanol. As
a result, RINs prices remain lower, removing a blending incentive from the
ethanol marketplace.
Increases in the price for crude oil and unleaded gasoline could have a negative
impact on the demand for gasoline and impact the market price of ethanol, which
could adversely impact our profitability. According to the EIA February 2020
Short Term Energy Outlook, U.S. gasoline demand was approximately 9.3 million
barrels per day in 2019 and is expected to stay at that same level in 2020. The
EIA forecasts regular gasoline prices to average $2.60 per gallon in 2020
compared to the 2019 average of $2.73 per gallon. The EIA also estimates the
summer peak price will gradually decrease from the peak in August at an average
of $2.68 per gallon to an average $2.53 per gallon in December. Any increase in
the average gallon cost to the public could have a negative impact on the EIA's
forecast.
In addition, crude oil prices have fallen sharply in March 2020, as a result of
market reaction to the coronavirus pandemic, which has caused global demand to
decline, and international price wars. Such marked decreases in crude oil prices
are likely to have a negative impact on the demand for ethanol, which are likely
to be exacerbated by overall lessened global energy demand as a result of the
coronavirus pandemic.
Continued ethanol production capacity increases could also have a negative
impact on the market price of ethanol, which could be further exacerbated if
domestic ethanol inventories remain high or grow, or if U.S. exports of ethanol
decline. Throughout 2019, some U.S. ethanol plants temporarily suspended
production due to negative margins and stagnant export projections caused by
trade barriers.
In recent years, exports of ethanol have increased; however, exports fell
slightly during the 2019 fiscal year compared to the 2018 fiscal year. Export
demand for ethanol is less consistent compared to domestic demand, which can
lead to ethanol price volatility. During 2017, Brazil and China adopted import
quotas and/or tariffs on the importation of ethanol, which are expected to
continue to negatively impact U.S. exports. China, the number three importer of
U.S. ethanol in 2016, has imported negligible volumes since imposing a 70%
tariff in 2018. Brazilian demand for US ethanol has remained relatively steady,
despite a tariff imposed in 2017 and renewed in 2019. Any decrease in U.S.
ethanol exports could adversely impact the market price of ethanol unless
domestic demand increases or foreign markets are developed.
During our first fiscal quarter of 2020, distillers' grains prices fell, due to
lower export demand and weakness in corn and soybean meal prices. In addition to
being an animal feed substitute for corn, distillers' grains are increasingly
considered a protein feed substitute for soybean meal. Management currently
believes that the impact of the current Chinese imposition of antidumping and
countervailing duties on distillers' grains produced in the U.S. has been
absorbed into the market. However, recent trade disputes with China, Mexico and
Canada could result in the imposition of additional tariffs on distillers'
grains produced in the United States, which could lead to an oversupply of
distillers' grains domestically and negatively impact distillers' grains prices.
Additionally, domestic feeding margins in cattle and hogs in particular could
have a negative impact on total domestic distillers' grains demand.
Corn oil prices have been slightly negatively impacted during the three months
ended January 31, 2020, in line with the recent historic perspective, which has
seen corn oil prices over the past few years be impacted by oversupply of
soybeans and the resulting lower price of soybean oil which competes with corn
oil for biodiesel production, in addition to increased corn oil production. The
impact of lower soybean oil prices and the market's increase in corn oil
production during the last few years will likely continue to impact corn oil
prices.
In December 2019, legislation was signed extending the $1.00 per-gallon
biodiesel blender tax credit retroactively to January 1, 2018 through December
31, 2022. However, corn oil prices may decrease if biodiesel producers reduce
production and/or demand for corn oil is reduced without extension of the
biodiesel blenders tax credit.
Given the inherent volatility in ethanol, distillers' grains, non-food grade
corn oil, grain and natural gas prices, we cannot predict the likelihood that
the spread between ethanol, distillers' grains, non-food grade corn oil, and
grain prices in future periods will be consistent compared to historical
periods.
21
Table of Contents
Government Supports and Regulation
The Renewable Fuels Standard
The ethanol industry is dependent on several economic incentives to produce
ethanol, the most significant of which is the federal Renewable Fuels Standard
("RFS"). The RFS has been, and we expect will continue to be, a significant
factor impacting ethanol usage. Any adverse ruling on, or legislation affecting,
the RFS could have an adverse impact on ethanol prices and our financial
performance in the future.
Under the provisions of the RFS, the EPA must publish an annual rule that
establishes the number of gallons of different types of renewable fuels,
including corn-based ethanol, that must be blended with gasoline in the U.S. by
refineries, blenders, distributors, and importers, which affects the domestic
market for ethanol. In December 2019, the EPA released the final 2020 renewable
volume obligations ("RVOs"), which included an overall blending requirement of
20.09 billion gallons for 2020, a slight increase from 2019 mandates.
Conventional corn-based ethanol levels were left at 15.0 billion gallons,
excluding any waivers granted by the EPA to small refiners for "hardship."
U.S. ethanol production capacity exceeded the EPA's 2018 and 2019 RVOs that
could be satisfied by corn-based ethanol. Under the RFS, if mandatory renewable
fuel volumes are reduced by at least 20% for two consecutive years, the EPA is
required to modify, or reset, statutory volumes through 2022. In October 2018,
the Office of Management and Budget announced that the 20% thresholds "have been
met or are expected to be met in the near future." In May 2019, the EPA
delivered the proposed RFS "reset" rule to the White House Office of Management
and Budget for its review. If the statutory RVOs are reduced as a result of
reset, it could have an adverse effect on the market price and demand for
ethanol which would negatively impact our financial performance.
There is growing availability of E85 for use in flexible fuel vehicles; however,
it is limited due to lacking infrastructure. In addition, the industry has been
working to introduce E15 to the retail market since the EPA approved its use in
vehicles model year 2001 and newer. Widespread adoption of E15 has been hampered
by regulatory and infrastructure hurdles in many states, as well as consumer
acceptance. Additionally, sales of E15 may have been limited because (i) it is
not approved for use in all vehicles, (ii) the EPA requires a label that
management believes may discourage consumers from using E15, and (iii) retailers
may choose not to sell E15 due to concerns regarding liability. In addition,
different gasoline blendstocks may have been required at certain times of the
year in order to use E15 due to federal regulations related to fuel evaporative
emissions. This may have prevented E15 from being used during certain times of
the year in various states. However, on May 30, 2019, the EPA issued a final
rule which allows E15 to be sold year-round. In June 2019, the American Fuel and
Petrochemical Manufacturers association filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the final rule. Additionally,
in August 2019, the Small Retailers Coalition filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia seeking review of the final rule. There
is no guarantee that the final rule will be upheld. Legal challenges could
create uncertainty for retailers desiring to implement or expand sales of E15.
Additionally, although the year-round E15 rule is now final, there is no
guarantee that retailers will implement the sale of year-round E15, nor is there
a guarantee that the rule will result in an increase of ethanol sales.
The EPA assigns individual refiners, blenders, and importers the RVOs they are
obligated to use based on their percentage of total fuel sales. Obligated
parties use RINs to show compliance with RVOs. RINs are attached to renewable
fuels by producers and detached when the renewable fuel is blended with
transportation fuel or traded in the open market. The market price of detached
RINs affects the price of ethanol in certain markets and influences the
purchasing decisions by obligated parties. Under the RFS, small refineries may
petition for and be granted temporary exemptions from the RVOs if they can
demonstrate that compliance with the RVOs would cause disproportionate economic
hardship. The EPA has recently granted a number of these exemptions, whereby
such refiners were alleviated of their responsibility to supply RINS for their
obligated volumes based upon the grounds of economic hardship. On February 20,
2020, the EPA released data on the number of waivers filed, which indicated that
23 petitions for waivers for the 2019 compliance year have been received. For
the 2018 compliance year, 42 petitions have been received. To date, the EPA has
approved 31 petitions and denied 6 petitions, and 5 petitions have been declared
ineligible or withdrawn. The 31 approved petitions have exempted approximately
1.43 billion RINs, which is approximately 13.42 billion gallons of gasoline and
diesel, from meeting the RFS blending targets. The 37 approved petitions for
compliance year 2017 exempted approximately 1.82 billion RINs, which is
approximately 17.05 billion gallons of gasoline and diesel, from meeting the RFS
blending targets. It is expected that additional petitions for waivers for the
2019 compliance year will be received by the EPA. It is also expected that the
EPA will approve a significant number of these waiver petitions, thereby
exempting a substantial number of gallons of
22
Table of Contents
gasoline and diesel from meeting the RFS blending targets. These exemptions
decrease demand for our products, which negatively impacts ethanol prices and
our profitability.
A proposed rule released by the EPA in October 2019 proposed changes intended to
project the exempted volume of gasoline and diesel due to small refinery
exemptions, regardless of whether such exemptions were actually granted after
the annual rulemaking. However, the final rule released by the EPA in December
2019 provides that EPA will project exempt volumes based on a three-year average
of the relief recommended by the Department of Energy ("DOE") for years
2016-2018, rather than based on actual exemptions granted. For the 2016
compliance year, the EPA said the DOE's recommended relief was approximately 440
million RINs. The EPA, however, actually granted waivers for approximately 790
million RINs. Similarly, the DOE's 2017 compliance year recommendation was 1.02
billion RINs, as compared to the approximately 1.82 billion RINs granted waivers
by the EPA. For the 2018 compliance year, the DOE recommended the EPA approve
waivers for 840 million RINs, as compared to the approximately 1.43 billion RINs
granted waivers by the EPA. The EPA's final rule also announced its general
policy approach with respect to small refinery waivers on a go-forward basis as
consistent with DOE's recommendations, where appropriate. The final rule fell
short of the relief that was urged by ethanol producers. As a result, management
expects that small refinery exemptions will continue to have a negative effect
on demand for our products, ethanol prices, and our profitability.
Legal challenges are underway to the RFS, including the EPA's recent reductions
in the RFS volume requirements, the 2018 final rule, and the denial of petitions
to change the RFS point of obligation. If the EPA's decision to reduce the
volume requirements under the RFS is allowed to stand, if the volume
requirements are further reduced, or if the RFS point of obligation were
changed, it could have an adverse effect on the market price and demand for
ethanol which would negatively impact our financial performance.
Beginning in January 2016, various ethanol and agricultural industry groups
petitioned a federal appeals court to hear a legal challenge to of the EPA's
decision to reduce the total renewable fuel volume requirements for 2014-2016
through use of its "inadequate domestic supply" waiver authority. On July 28,
2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the
petitioners, concluding that the EPA erred in its exercise of "inadequate
domestic supply" waiver authority by considering demand-side constraints. As a
result, the Court vacated the EPA's decision to reduce the total renewable fuel
volume requirements for 2016, and remanded to the EPA to address the 2016 total
renewable fuels volume requirements. In December 2019, the EPA announced that it
is deferring action on this issue until an anticipated date in early 2020. While
management believes the decision should benefit the ethanol industry overall by
clarifying the EPA's waiver analysis is limited to consideration of supply-side
factors only, no direct impact on the Company is expected from the decision.
On May 1, 2018, the Advanced Biofuels Association submitted a petition with the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenging EPA's process for
granting exemptions from compliance under the RFS to small refineries. The
Advanced Biofuel Association petition asks the court to review the EPA's
decision to modify criteria to lower the threshold by which the agency
determines whether to grant small refineries an exemption for the RFS for
reasons of disproportionate economic hardship. In May 2019, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied a motion by the Advanced Biofuels
Association seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the EPA from granting
any additional small refinery exemptions under the RFS until its pending lawsuit
with the agency is resolved. In August 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
D.C. Circuit denied the petition, upholding the EPA's decisions.
Additionally, on May 29, 2018, the National Corn Growers Association, National
Farmers Union, and the Renewable Fuels Association ("RFA") filed a petition with
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit challenging the EPA's grant of
waivers to three specific refineries. The petitioners are asking the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to reject the waivers granted to three
refineries located in Wynnewood, Oklahoma, Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Woods Cross,
Utah as an abuse of EPA authority. These waived gallons are not redistributed to
obligated parties, and in effect, reduce the aggregate RVOs under the RFS. In
January 2020, the court struck down the exemptions as improperly issued by the
EPA. The court interpreted the RFS statute to require that any exemption granted
to a small refinery after 2010 must take the form of an "extension," which would
require a small refinery exemption in prior years to prolong, enlarge or add to.
The court approved a 15-day extension of the deadline to file a petition for
rehearing, which sets the deadline at March 24, 2020. If the specific waivers
granted by the EPA and/or its lower criteria for granting small refinery waivers
under the RFS are allowed to stand, or if the volume requirements are further
reduced, it could have an adverse effect on the market price and demand for
ethanol which would negatively impact our financial performance.
23
Table of Contents
Related to the recent lawsuits, the Renewable Fuels Association, American
Coalition for Ethanol, Growth Energy, National Biodiesel Board, National Corn
Growers Association, Biotechnology Industry Organization, and National Farmers
Union petitioned the EPA on June 4, 2018 to change its regulations to account
for lost volumes of renewable fuel resulting from the retroactive small refinery
exemptions. This petition to EPA seeks a broader, forward-looking remedy to
account for the collective lost volumes caused by the recent increase in
retroactive small refinery RVO exemptions. In June 2018, the court issued a stay
pending further administrative proceedings. On July 30, 2019, the groups
petitioned the court to lift such stay. It is unclear what regulatory changes,
if any, will emerge from the petition to the EPA.
Further, on July 31, 2018, Producers of Renewables United for Integrity Truth
and Transparency filed a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the D.C. Circuit, petitioning for review of final agency action by the EPA in
its decision to allow the generation of RINs by obligated parties under the RFS
that do not represent biofuel production in the year the RIN was generated. In
May 2019, the court issued an order dismissing a portion of the lawsuit
challenging the EPA's timing, due to untimely filing. The order also transferred
the RINs issues to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.
Also, on August 30, 2018, the RFA and Growth Energy filed a lawsuit in federal
district court, alleging that the EPA and U.S. Department of Energy have
improperly denied agency records requested by RFA, Growth Energy, and others
under the Freedom of Information Act. The requested documents relate to
exemptions from Renewable Fuel Standard compliance obligations granted by EPA.
Additionally, on February 4, 2019, Growth Energy filed a lawsuit in the Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia against the EPA, challenging the EPA's
"failure" to address small refinery exemptions in its 2019 RVO rulemaking.
Although the maintenance of the 15.0 billion gallon threshold for volume
requirements that may be met with corn-based ethanol in the 2020 final rule, in
addition to the year-round E15 rule, signals support from the EPA and the Trump
administration for domestic ethanol production, the Trump administration could
still elect to materially modify, repeal, or otherwise invalidate the RFS. Any
such reform could adversely affect the demand and price for ethanol and the
Company's profitability.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Reform Act") was
signed into law. The Tax Reform Act includes significant changes to the taxation
of partnership entities. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the Tax
Reform Act with its professional advisors. The full impact of the Tax Reform Act
on the Company in future periods cannot be predicted at this time. On March 23,
2018, Congress rescinded an unintended consequence of the Tax Reform Act under
section 199A, which provided certain tax benefits to producers selling grain to
cooperative associations and enabled a potential marketplace advantage over
other agribusiness companies.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2020 and 2019
The following table shows summary information from the results of our operations
and the approximate percentage of revenues, costs of goods sold, operating
expenses and other items to total revenues in our unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended January 31,
2020 and 2019 (amounts in thousands).
© Edgar Online, source Glimpses