EBA AND ESMA REPORT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE REGULATION (EU) NO 575/2013 (CRR) WITH THE RELATED OBLIGATIONS UNDER REGULATION (EU) NO 648/2012 (EMIR)‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌

ESAS-2017-82 │11 January 2017

Contents

Abbreviations 2

Executive summary 3

  1. Introduction 4

  2. Analysis of potential duplicative requirements 5

  3. Capital requirements for CCPs holding a banking licence 5

    Background 5

    Financial resources in accordance with Articles 41 to 44 of the EMIR - clearing activities 7

    Capital requirements in accordance with Article 16 of the EMIR 7

    CRR - Pillar 2 requirements 8

    Capital requirements for interoperability arrangements 8

    Conclusion and proposal 10

  4. Leverage and liquidity for CCPs 11

    LR application to CCPs and CMs 11

    Liquidity - NSFR and LCR 12

    Conclusion 13

  5. Large exposures 13

    Background 13

    Conclusion 14

  6. Difference in MPoR application 14

    Background 14

    Conclusion 15

  7. Clients' exposures to CMs 16

    Background 16

    Focus on CRR conditions in Article 305 17

    Segregation 17

    Porting 18

    Legal opinion 19

    Conclusion and proposal 19

  8. Conclusions 20

  9. Abbreviations

    CCP

    central counterparty

    CCR

    counterparty credit risk

    CM MPoR

    clearing member margin period of risk

    EAD

    exposure at default

    IM

    initial margin

    NSFR

    net stable funding requirements

    LR

    leverage ratio

    LCR

    liquidity coverage ratio

    Executive summary

    This report provides the main conclusions from the analysis of the joint functioning of the Capital Requirements Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) with the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (EMIR).

    As requested in the mandate, the European Banking Authority (EBA), together with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), has focused in particular on those institutions operating as CCPs, and have assessed any potential duplication of requirements for derivative transactions with the ultimate goal of avoiding regulatory risks, as well as undue increased monitoring costs

    for competent authorities.

    After the review of the issues, the EBA and ESMA would recommend that the Commission clarify the overlap of the capital requirements for CCPs holding a banking licence, as well as clarify the wording of Article 305.

    The legal basis of this report is in Article 515 paragraph 1 of the CRR, which requires that: 'By 2 January 2015, EBA, together with ESMA, shall report on the functioning of this Regulation with the related obligations under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 and in particular with regard to institutions operating a CCP, in order to avoid duplication of requirements for derivative transactions and thereby avoid increased regulatory risk and increased costs for monitoring by competent authorities.'

European Union published this content on 18 January 2017 and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 18 January 2017 15:11:04 UTC.

Original documenthttps://www.esma.europa.eu/file/21189/download?token=8iATiqJa

Public permalinkhttp://www.publicnow.com/view/8D9AD65EFEE204728A0C0C5C68DB194F6D9853EB