Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
46.04 USD | +0.44% | +6.55% | +28.17% |
04-29 | UAW deal with Daimler Truck boosts energy ahead of Mercedes vote in Alabama | RE |
04-29 | NHTSA Receives Notice of Two Incidents Involving Ford's Driver-Assistance System | DJ |
Summary
- The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
- Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 5.06 and 4.93 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2025 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.
- The company shows low valuation levels, with an enterprise value at 0.26 times its sales.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.
- For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.
- For the past twelve months, EPS forecast has been revised upwards.
- Analysts covering this company mostly recommend stock overweighting or purchase.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised upwards significantly.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.
- Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+28.17% | 52.28B | C+ | ||
+35.50% | 300B | C+ | ||
+19.57% | 82.12B | B- | ||
+8.01% | 70.32B | B- | ||
+19.41% | 53.62B | C+ | ||
+4.59% | 51.06B | C+ | ||
+28.14% | 43.93B | B | ||
+23.59% | 39.41B | C | ||
+19.23% | 27.31B | B | ||
+15.38% | 25.9B | B |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- GM Stock
- Ratings General Motors Company