Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
3.886 EUR | +3.30% | +3.30% | -8.56% |
04-16 | La Gran Carpa Catedral Reaches New Audiences Across Europe and MENA | CI |
04-15 | Eutelsat: partnership with Comtech in Antarctica | CF |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- Over the last twelve months, the sales forecast has been frequently revised upwards.
Weaknesses
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- One of the major weak points of the company is its financial situation.
- With an enterprise value anticipated at 3.56 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Most analysts recommend that the stock should be sold or reduced.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Wireless Telecommunications Services
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-8.56% | 1.97B | B+ | ||
-12.04% | 151B | C+ | ||
-11.84% | 8.9B | - | D | |
-3.44% | 4.34B | D | ||
-23.79% | 3.81B | C- | ||
-33.51% | 2.43B | D | ||
+34.67% | 1.69B | - | ||
-8.05% | 1.59B | - | ||
-3.79% | 376M | B- | ||
-63.02% | 308M | - | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ETL Stock
- Ratings Eutelsat Communications